Secret Service School Violence Guide Fails to Deliver on Stated Purpose

No one is expecting teachers to become professional operators. That said, you'd think these self-styled “elites” would be able to give better advice than (essentially) “Hold committee meetings.” (United States Secret Service/Facebook)

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- Recently, the United States Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center released another tool in support of the effort to end the prevalence of targeted violence effecting the Nation, the world, and most importantly – our schools,” the agency announced in a July 12 press release. “ENHANCING SCHOOL SAFETY USING A THREAT ASSESSMENT MODEL – An Operational Guide for Preventing Targeted School Violence, was developed to provide fundamental direction on how to prevent incidents of targeted school violence.”

The guide itself credits “staff” and six “Social Science Research Specialists” reporting to the “Chief” of the National Threat Assessment Center, with degrees ranging from M.A., M.Ed. and Ph.D. Exactly what experience or achievements any of them have actually attained with the stated purpose of the guidelines, “preventing targeted school violence,” is unclear.

So are the “Contents.”

We start off with a “Message from the Director,” because he is the boss, and an “Introduction” that tells us “there is no profile of a student attacker.” We then get to the meat of things with “Creating a comprehensive targeted violence prevention plan.”

You’ve got to put together a “multidisciplinary team.” You should figure out the types of behaviors that are “prohibited” and “concerning.” You’ll need to be able to report such concerns, anonymously if need be (just make sure you don’t report protected classes, because experience tells us “If you see something, say something” does not apply equally to all). Next you’ll have to figure out when to call the cops. And you’ll need “assessment procedures,” which can include anything from warrantless searches (it’s not like young people are being indoctri… taught to be free citizens with rights) to creeping on social media.

The assessment procedures get more detailed to include determining “inappropriate interests,” “weapons access,” “stressors,” “capacity to carry out an attack” and the like, and that’s all fine and good, but truly – authorities have had such information before, on numerous occasions, and the failure to react appropriately seems to come inordinately from their end.

What’s missing completely is, once all of these precautionary, analytical and reporting measures fail, what are all the people on the ”multidisciplinary team” supposed to do then?

The time for “creating and promoting safe school climates” is not when the monster they’ve either been concerned about, or oblivious to, decides to go on a rampage. When that happens what “training for all stakeholders” will help stop it in its tracks?  Exactly what will any of the actual “first responders” be prepared to do to “prevent targeted school violence”?

The guide is suddenly silent on that. I guess the question is, which would you rather have in those circumstances? An advanced degree in social sciences or a defensive pistol shooting course or two under your belt?

“Teachers shouldn’t have to be armed!” various sheep bleat, coming up with every excuse in the world to abdicate responsibility for their own safety and the safety of children entrusted to their care. Stated that way, it’s a lie.  No one should “have to,” and even the Founders had exemptions for those deemed “conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms.”

That argument is a red herring to mask what those making it are really doing: presuming to take the choice away from Americans entitled to keep and bear arms. Besides, if you can’t expect “pacifist” teachers to assume the basics for their own defense, how is it reasonable to expect them to execute complex and coordinated investigative and risk assessment/management duties?

The Secret Service guide basically states the obvious on what you’d think responsible schools should have already been doing, especially considering all the money thrown at “education” in this country. Instead, what we see are their institutions committed to erasing the historical moorings that enabled the Republic to rise to heights of achievement and liberty never before experienced by humankind, and to filling that intentionally-created void with loathing, resentment and hatred for the builders.

The wonder is that such bizarrely unnatural and oppressive environments haven’t driven more over the edge.


About David Codrea:David Codrea
David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating / defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.
In addition to being a field editor/columnist at GUNS Magazine and associate editor for Oath Keepers, he blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

  • 19
    Leave a Reply

    Please Login to comment
    10 Comment threads
    9 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    13 Comment authors
    TionicoElmoHenryWoody W WoodwardGunluvr Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    Tionico
    Guest
    Tionico

    Say, maybe I’m remembering a subplot from a bad movie, but wasn’t it a gaggle of “Secret Service” goons got caught out in a little business in some hotel i COlombia, perhaps Bogotá? involving the employment of some prostitutes for their off-duty entertainment? Something about they not only hired and used them, but refused to pay one of them, who squealed on them….. and some of the involved “personnel” got suddeny shifted around a bit to shake off the hounds… this was, if memory serves, back in the days of the Wretched Reign of the Kinyun. Or maybe it really… Read more »

    Tionico
    Guest
    Tionico

    I haev two words for anyone who is opposed to the policy of allowing any teacher or adult staff, already present and involved at some school on a daily basis, to be armed SHOULD THEY CHOOSE TO BE ARMED. No one advocates FORCING them to carry. But no sane person opposes their decision to be armed at school, just like they are the rest of their daily lives.. the bank, restaurant, coffee shop, store, libarry, driving to/from school, theatre, county offices, church, social gatherings, parks, beach, out cycling, jobbing, walking the dog, ….. those two words are: AARON FEIS. If… Read more »

    Henry
    Guest
    Henry

    “The assessment procedures get more detailed to include determining “inappropriate interests…”
    Well, the Secret Service sure has expertise on that, given the list of degenerates whose security they’ve been tasked to provide over the past 100 years.

    Woody W Woodward
    Guest
    Woody W Woodward

    Typical government reaction – – Get some overly “educated” cubicle dwellers who actually do not have a clue together in a conference room. Write some papers, establish a set of protocols which may or may not effectively address the undetermined objective, get some feel good legislation mandating some additional continuing adult education passed, Hang some signs and motivational posters in the hall and then go home. See? Everything has been fixed.
    [W3]

    Wildfire Masters
    Guest
    Wildfire Masters

    Wolves shouldn’t kill sheep, but that doesn’t seem to stop wolves from killing sheep. How many of the “Gun-Free Zone” school shootings, that we hear so much about, were already ILLEGAL ACTS, committed in violation of numerous currently existing laws, which totally FORBID the illegal act of murder, in places where simply possession of a gun is already a FELONY? So what new “reasonable” gun control laws, are we to believe, that the violent predators who ignore the current and more serious laws against rape, robbery, and murder would obey? Where has the cowardly and illogical ideology of “The more… Read more »

    Jim Macklin
    Guest
    Jim Macklin

    It is really simple. There are over 125,000 schools in the United States with at least a million classrooms.To guard a million room and 30 million students requires a little simple math… one teacher in every classroom, armed with a AR SBR 300 BLK behind a bulletproof desk would be ideal protection. Teachers are already background checked and most are smart enough to read and understand the laws and the operations manual of an AR. Certainly some training would be very desirable but having armed teachers in every classroom would save lives. Perhaps saving lives is not the object. Maybe… Read more »

    Make America Stupid Again
    Guest
    Make America Stupid Again

    I get that you’re gun nuts, but trained professionals have a hard enough time performing in an actual shoot out with constant training. How on Earth do you honestly expect barely trained teachers to effectively neutralize a threat?

    Jim Macklin
    Guest
    Jim Macklin

    Dear Stupid, “I get that you’re gun nuts, but trained professionals have a hard enough time performing in an actual shoot out with constant training. How on Earth do you honestly expect barely trained teachers to effectively neutralize a threat?” Guns are equalizers that compensate for size and physical strength. Teachers should be expected to be above average intelligence, so operating a firearm should eb easy for a teacher to become proficient. The “professionals” you speak about are often police officers who carry a gun because they are REQUIRED TO DO SO. Some cops only shoot when their training officer… Read more »

    m.
    Guest
    m.

    The teach-uhs is too busy indoctrinatin’ plus they be clit-on vot-uhs, runs against they ide-ology.

    Wild Bill
    Guest
    Wild Bill

    @MASA, teachers have a better chance of making a meaningful defense if they are armed in a meaningful way. I caution you, however, my Constitutionally recognized Civil Right to keep, carry, make, buy and sell all manner of arms does not pivot on the issue that you proffer.

    Henry
    Guest
    Henry

    “How on Earth do you honestly expect barely trained teachers to effectively neutralize a threat?”

    You’re right. Disarmed teachers will be far superior at neutralizing threats.

    Dipwit.

    Elmo
    Guest
    Elmo

    They could undoubtedly do a better job neutralizing a threat than a certain Broward County Sheriffs Deputy did at Parkland High School.

    Tionico
    Guest
    Tionico

    BOOM!!!!

    Tionico
    Guest
    Tionico

    for Stupid: go and study a bit about the FASTER Saves Lives programme. It started in the State of Ohio as a response to the nasty school shooting in Newtown. Remember, the tie when the perp had committed somewhere between twenty and forty FELONY CRIMES between the time he woke up that morning and the time he arrived at the school and shot up the front door to gain access. THEN he went on to kill more than twenty defensless innocents. Some “gun nuts” in Ohiodecided to stop playing footsie under the table and they built a PLAN to cure… Read more »

    Colonialgirl
    Guest
    Colonialgirl

    When you see that the “educational levels are: Quote}” M.A., M.Ed. and Ph.D”{quote it’s a sure sign of anything being spewed is a sure indicator of total ignorance and idiocy; especially the M.Ed but the Piled Higher and Deeper doesn’t denote any ability to think either.

    P.R.
    Guest
    P.R.

    Finally, somebody puts it in writing! I don’t know why teachers “wouldnt” WANT to be Trained to “Stop a Threat”…until it stops moving…so it can’t hurt ANY of the “Sheep” They are in “Charge Of”. I Pray More School & Teachers get on Board b/c it seems there is a LOT of Hate out there & a Lot of Kids who maybe wasn’t taught about firearms, what they are actually for and how to RESPECT them! Unfortunately it’s too late sometimes to teach a hormone filled teen/adult “how to Respect” not only firearms but also “People”. Why on Earth would… Read more »

    Gunluvr
    Guest
    Gunluvr

    Teachers should not be forced to carry guns any more or less than any other civilian should be forced to own one, as gun ownership is an unconditional right, so is the option not to own, carry or use one.

    Henry
    Guest
    Henry

    Maybe yes, maybe no. Job descriptions change, and employers get to say what they are. 70 years ago, firemen didn’t have to know CPR. Now they are “forced to.” Librarians didn’t have to be computer-literate. Now they are “forced to.” Diner cooks didn’t have to perform complicated gyrations just in case a guest showed up with a real or imagined food sensitivity. Now they are all “forced to.” If teachers (as opposed to a separate layer of support staff) are going to be officially charged with the “safety” of their students, maybe it’s time their job description changed, too. But,… Read more »

    VT Patriot
    Guest
    VT Patriot

    Beautiful assessment of the overall ‘feel good’ laws and proceedures being instituted with no teeth. Imagine, after watching a nutcase moron for months, he decides one morning to go shoot up a school. This will call for more meetings, more papers issued, more laws to be enacted to train – – – who and for what? The well misinterpreted “only a good guy with a gun” phrase, means nothing to them. Only a good guy with a degree in social engineering and the ability to write lots of papers for fellow social justice engineers to applaud, will work. And then… Read more »