Ft Collins, CO –-(Ammoland.com)- Frauds and Liars:
As our midterm election season approaches, the traditional, hard-left, anti-gun stance of the Democrat Party is being ruthlessly enforced upon all Democrat candidates.
All running for office on the Democrat ticket are expected to fall in line on this issue.
But, when asked about individual rights protected by our Second Amendment, Democrats consistently lie about their intentions.
From a recent letter to a constituent from a Democrat NY Senator (Chuck Schumer):
“I believe the right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Constitution’s Second Amendment…
I respect the Second Amendment, but I also believe that we have a collective interest in keeping guns out of the hands of those who want to harm the innocent….
I will work with my colleagues to protect the rights of gun owners while respecting the rights of each state to determine how best to protect its citizens….”
All sounds wonderful!
Yet, this beguiling senator has spent his entire political career working tirelessly to regulate privately-owned guns out of existence in his state, and in the rest of the Country.
He is an all-too-typical “guns for me, but not for thee” Democrat.
I have yet to listen to one of these neo-Marxists (masquerading as “Democrats”) who did not begin his soothing lie with “… and I believe in our Second Amendment,” followed by “… and as a youngster, I hunted with my grandfather,” ad nauseam.
Then comes the duplicitous “… therefore, as an American Citizen you have ‘rights,’ BUT
- a) they are not ‘inalienable and endowed by our Creator;’ no, they are weak and temporary, and we politicians, in our condescending magnanimity, arbitrarily bestow them upon you (or withdraw them), at our whim.
- b) and rights are only ‘collective,’ never individual, and never absolute
- c) so we’ll be the ones to decide if you really ‘need’ a gun or not
It’s much like a smooth-talking serial murderer who assures you that he only wants to bind your hands and feet “for just a few minutes,” and after all “it’s for your own protection.”
How will you vote this November? Believe these liars at your peril!
“When you’re dealing with frauds and liars, listen more to what they don’t say, than what they do.” ~ DaShanne Stokes
About John Farnam & Defense Training International, Inc
As a defensive weapons and tactics instructor John Farnam will urge you, based on your own beliefs, to make up your mind in advance as to what you would do when faced with an imminent lethal threat. You should, of course, also decide what preparations you should make in advance if any. Defense Training International wants to make sure that their students fully understand the physical, legal, psychological, and societal consequences of their actions or in-actions.
It is our duty to make you aware of certain unpleasant physical realities intrinsic to the Planet Earth. Mr. Farnam is happy to be your counselor and advisor. Visit: www.defense-training.com
Sounds like the cop who tells you, “You’re not under arrest, but I’m going to handcuff you for your safety and mine.” First off, no matter what he says, if you cannot exercise your right to leave without having restraints removed, you are in a situation that meets the definition of “arrested,”even if you’re not going to be charged. Second, but no less important, there is no conceivable way that handcuffing me will increase MY safety (the LEO’s – maybe), but saying he’s doing it for “his safety and mine” is an outright lie.
If you like your guns you can keep your guns. Sound familiar?
Hay guys, I have a few letters from dear CHUCKIE S and they all say the same thing .I support the second amendment BUT (and this is the big one ) WITH RESTRICTIONS . That means ,YES I CAN CARRY (and he does) AND YOU CAN’T Buy the way the gov. of NEW YORK also has a CARRY PERMIT.
Upchuck schemer revealed himself to be a prototypical ‘butter’ way back when he was a junior senator by coming to Washington State to ‘assist’ in an early gun registration scheme – Initiative 1076 IIRC. Fortunately the hard lefties from Seattle/King County didn’t have enough clout at that time and if failed miserably. NOW they do have that clout and are pushing thru every gun control plan that they have drooled over for decades. I’m glad I moved back to Texas post retirement. BTW – CPT Taggart is spot on regarding the democRAT candidate for governor here. Much like upchuck, they… Read more »
to bad because of main stream media, half of the population believe in these criminals. sorry to say most of these people need to be removed from there positions, including the media that lies to this nation. it is like a cancer eating at the body. if it is not removed it will kill the body. these people are the cancer. the body they are killing is this country, A Civil War is needed to remove the cancer from our country because the Democrats are killing us.
It’s sad but you’re absolutely right. The thing about another civil war is also spot on. The looney left democrats have been swearing into office with their fingers crossed behind their backs. They never plan on defending the Constitution, as soon as they have power they do whatever they can to destroy our rights. I’m saddened by the prospect but will be happy when the civil war is over. Because then hopefully Americans will not have to fight toothe and nail constantly to exercise their rights as documented in the Constitution. I may not survive it but I’ll fight to… Read more »
Democrats have been lying to American Blacks for over 55 yrs so it’s not hard to believe that they would lie to American Gun owners.
“I believe the right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Constitution’s Second Amendment… I respect the Second Amendment, but I also believe that we have a collective interest in keeping guns out of the hands of those who want to harm the innocent…. I will work with my colleagues to protect the rights of gun owners while respecting the rights of each state to determine how best to protect its citizens….” Every time I hear statements like this from Chuckie Schumer, or any other Democrat politician for that matter, the first thing that comes to my mind is “Bulls**t!… Read more »
@Phil iT, Sorry, but that “… but I also believe that we have a collective interest in keeping guns out of the hands of those who want to harm the innocent….” part does not exist in American or Texas law. There is no “collective interest” there are only Civil Rights belonging to persons or Powers and Authorities belonging to the governments. That collective interest thing you made up and everything following from it are blatantly, and completely wrong. You have the federal civil right to life and Texas statutory justification to use force against another when and to the degree… Read more »
Unfortunately, there is no reliable way to determine those “who want to hurt the innocent.” It simply cannot be predicted without HUGE levels of “false positives,” ie, predictions that someone will become violent, who actually does not. For this reason, all the recent proposals will be far more effective at infringing the self-defense rights of innocents, than at preventing another wrongful shooting incident. If we exclude the idea that these proposals are merely political rises intended to work around the Constitution and disarm as much of the public as possible (the most plausible rationale), you are left with trying to… Read more »
Former Dallas County Sheriff Lupe Valdez is running as a Democrat for Governor of Texas. She touts as her qualifications that she is a Hispanic Lesbian. She is strongly anti-gun and points to her law enforcement experience- never noting that her term as Dheriff was marked primarily by her own personal administrative and managerial incompetence. Nor is it mentioned that she failed her Texas Peace Officers Handgun Qualification numerous times in front of witnesses, but passed after one-on-one private test observed by no one except the tester. This was reported to me by deputies who chose to remain nameless. No… Read more »
@CT, Can’t shoot. Can’t manage or administer an organization. Engages in fraud. Can not understand the concept of Civil Rights. But she is qualified to be governor because of whom she choses to have sex with? She will be a star of the Homosocialist party!
“I respect the Second Amendment, but…”
“I support the Second Amendment, but…”
Over and over we see this mantra. In each case, the ‘but’ negates the statement. The precense of the ‘but’ or maybe a ‘however’, immediately shows their lack of actual support, their lack of veracity. It is a mere lip service, followed by their actual intention to support “The Narrative”, not the Constitution.
The word “but” (the strongest word in the English language!) actually means “forget everything I just said…”
As soon as the word “but” is added after ANY statement the words spoken previously are 100% certified BULLSHIT !
And that is a FACT.
Notalima is fully correct.
any time a politician says I support yor right I agree with your views but (your but is screwd)
I guess its time to go back to the Obama era. I’ll keep my freedom guns and money you can keep the change.
Humans never choose evil over good. Sen. Schumer and his ilk rationalize their choice of gun bans or “strict regulation” as doing good for the lesser members of their species, who lack the wisdom to know the danger they put themselves in by exercising their liberty, and those inherent rights that are so distressing to such control freaks.
We saw the dream of “a better, sober society” enforced on this nation by such sanctimonious, self-appointed guardians of the “lesser folk” for 13 years of Prohibition, with disastrous affects on this country..
@LP Good points. Schumer and the other members of the Depraved Neurotic Catastrophe party are covert slave makers.
before employing threats of grievous bodily harm or death, d-rats should consider that…a lot of things can happen to dog s***t