Car Crash Ends With Argument, Driver Shot In Ankle

Bob Irwin highlights the latest self-defense and other shootings of the week. Read them and see what went wrong, what went right and what we can learn from self-defense with a gun.

Smoking Gun
Car Crash Ends With Argument, Driver Shot In Ankle

USA –-(Ammoland.com)- Twin Cities.com reports 09-21-18 St, Paul, Minnesota, a minor car accident in downtown ended with a confrontation and a driver being shot in the ankle on Thursday, according to Sgt. Mike Ernster of the St. Paul Police.

When Officers responded to the 7:25 p.m. accident scene, a 35-year-old motorist told police that he had been stopped at the light at Seventh and Robert streets when a red four-door vehicle struck his vehicle.

The suspect kept going and the victim followed him to Ninth and Robert streets. That’s where the offending driver suddenly stopped and exited his vehicle.

The drivers got into a verbal argument with each other as the offending driver denied striking the other vehicle. The victim whose vehicle was struck said the other driver suddenly pulled out a gun and started shooting at him. [Surprise!]

After the victim was hit in the ankle, the victim ducked behind his own car. He drew his legal concealed firearm and returned fire.

The suspect fled the scene on foot and was not found. A woman, who was a passenger in the suspect’s vehicle, drove away.

Paramedics took the victim to Regions Hospital, where he was treated for a non-life threatening injury.

Comments:

Apparently another case of “Road Rage”. This is why citizens carry firearms for self-defense. Clearly if he had not been armed, he would be dead.

That being said, consider driving away when the perp stopped and calling 911 with his description and plate number would have saved the victim here a lot of time and paperwork.

I’ve worked on a few cases over the years wherein after a minor fender bender, the offended driver pursues “To get the license number”. When these end up in a shooting – who was the aggressor?

Let the police do the chasing!

Bob Irwin
Bob Irwin

Bob Irwin, Las Vegas

About Bob Irwin

Bob is retired after 30 years of ownership of The Gun Store & Indoor Range in Las Vegas. He continues his 2A issues show “Fired Up with Bob Irwin” on YouTube and on KLEY 1230 AM, The Nevada Talk Network on Saturdays.

As a firearm instructor of Concealed Firearm Applicants, Armed Security Officer and Law Enforcement Academies over his career, Bob appears frequently as an expert witness for firearm & use of force cases in Federal, State, and local courts.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  • 14
    Leave a Reply

    Please Login to comment
    2 Comment threads
    12 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    5 Comment authors
    Heed the Call-upHerbRoy D.Wild BillTionico Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    Wild Bill
    Guest
    Wild Bill

    How long did it take the St. Paul PD to show up? Is Corky Finny no longer Chief of Police? Is Sgt Wanda “Wombat” Le Blanc retired? What is going on with that PD?

    Roy D.
    Guest
    Roy D.

    The question should rather be who first presented a threat of physical harm to the other? Remember the old rhyme: Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.

    Calling 911 was the better course of action once he obtained the tag number and description of the car and, if possible, the driver. He most likely will not confront someone like this again. And did he feel comfortable doing this because he was carrying a “talisman” in the form of a firearm?

    Heed the Call-up
    Guest
    Heed the Call-up

    Roy, I seriously doubt that he pursued the vehicle because he was CC. I believe it is a normal reaction when one is the victim of a hit and run, so as to identify the vehicle. In this story the driver of the vehicle that hit him was the one to initiate the assault, and also pull a firearm and begin shooting, not the victim. Since I got my CC, I am even more passive in how I handle issues, not that I was ever aggressive, but I tend to let things roll off my back even more so now.… Read more »

    Roy D.
    Guest
    Roy D.

    On 6-26-17 I was ran off of I-40 by Richard James Tate of 940 S Berry Trail Ct, Copper Canyon, TX (214) 226-6062. He was driving a one ton pickup and pulling a travel trailer. It was only a miracle that I didn’t wreck and was seriously hurt. I got him to stop about a half mile from the incident spot. I had to go up to him and after talking for about one minute he rolled up his window and roared off almost running over my feet in the process. I went back to my car while dialing the… Read more »

    Heed the Call-up
    Guest
    Heed the Call-up

    Roy, in your first post you claimed that a law-abiding citizen would pursue only if armed with his/her “talisman”, and then assault the offender. Now in this post you claim that you are always armed and pursued an offender, but didn’t assault the person and claim that your firearm is not a “talisman”, but a tool. My belief, based on your posts, is that you are the tool. Your MO is the same as every other anti-rights person, you imply that you are the only one allowed to have the rights as protected by our constitution, the rest of us… Read more »

    Heed the Call-up
    Guest
    Heed the Call-up

    Roy, no, I stated what I thought of your posts. I hold your opinion in as much regard as I do all other ignorant, Leftist trolls. Your posts are about as meaningful as fish farts and as realistic. As a typical Leftist, you believe you have rights that you wish to deny others. You can rant and rave and use ad hominem attacks, but that just is further proof of how ignorant and wrong your views are.

    Tionico
    Guest
    Tionico

    Leave the “talisman” slur out. My guess is that the law abiding one who got hit was not trying to settle a score, only to identify the one causing the damage to his car, a thing we are REQUIRED to do when two cars collide. The fact that he did not present immediately he reached the other driver when stopped tels me he did not have violence in view as he persued. He presumed from the start that the other driver would be decent and responsible. It was the hitter that quickly escalated things to deadly force time. Good job… Read more »

    Roy D.
    Guest
    Roy D.

    Pray tell how the use of the word “talisman” is a slur?

    Heed the Call-up
    Guest
    Heed the Call-up

    Roy, because in your post you meant it as such to demean law-abiding citizens that are also firearm owners. Your negative post makes your feelings about law-abiding citizens quite clear.

    Roy D.
    Guest
    Roy D.

    Thank you. I now know that you are someone whos ability to think logically does not exist. You also apparently like to talk out of your ass.

    Heed the Call-up
    Guest
    Heed the Call-up

    Roy, such polite words from an ignorant, Internet troll.

    Wild Bill
    Guest
    Wild Bill

    @Roy D. the word talisman connotes a device with false protective qualities that gives the holder a false sense of security. A firearm has real, actual protective, not imagined, qualities. There for you either misused the word talisman because you did not know what it means or you intended to convey an untruth.

    Roy D.
    Guest
    Roy D.

    In the case in question, the possessor decides what qualities his firearm possesses. My question is if he might have thought it gave him powers he did not possess himself. This is not an unheard of occurrence with some of those who carry firearms. Perhaps the question was too hard or hit too close to home for some.

    Herb
    Guest
    Herb

    He’s incapable of comprehending the connotation so I’d give up.