Is This Worse Than ’68?

1968 Chicago Police Riots
1968 Chicago Police Riots

U.S.A.-( Saturday, in Pittsburgh, a Sabbath celebration at the Tree of Life synagogue became the site of the largest mass murder of Jews in U.S. history. Eleven worshippers were killed by a racist gunman.

Friday, we learned the identity of the crazed criminal who mailed pipe bombs to a dozen leaders of the Democratic Party, including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden.

From restaurants to Capitol corridors, this campaign season we have seen ugly face-offs between leftist radicals and Republican senators.

Are we more divided than we have ever been? Are our politics more poisoned? Are we living in what Charles Dickens called “the worst of times” in America? Is today worse than 1968?

Certainly, the hatred and hostility, the bile and bitterness of our discourse, seem greater now than 50 years ago. But are the times really worse?

1968 began with one of the greatest humiliations in the history of the American Navy. The U.S. spy ship Pueblo was hijacked in international waters and its crew interned by North Korea.

A week later came the Tet Offensive, where every provincial capital in South Vietnam was attacked. A thousand U.S. troops died in February, 10,000 more through 1968.

Saigon Execution Eddie Adams 1968
Saigon Execution, Eddie Adams 1968

On March 14, anti-war Senator Gene McCarthy captured 42 percent of the vote in New Hampshire against President Johnson.

With LBJ wounded, Robert Kennedy leapt into the race, accusing the president who had enacted civil rights of “dividing the country” and removing himself from “the enduring and generous impulses that are the soul of this nation.” Lyndon Johnson, said Kennedy, is “calling upon the darker impulses of the American spirit.”

Today, RFK is remembered as a “uniter.”

With Gov. George Wallace tearing at Johnson from the right and Kennedy and McCarthy attacking from the left — and Nixon having cleared the Republican field with a landslide in New Hampshire — LBJ announced on March 31 he would not run again.

Four days later, Martin Luther King, leading a strike of garbage workers, was assassinated in Memphis. One hundred U.S. cities exploded in looting, arson and riots. The National Guard was called up everywhere and federal troops rushed to protect Washington, D.C., long corridors of which were gutted, not to be rebuilt for a generation.

Before April's end, Columbia University had exploded in the worst student uprising of the decade. It was put down only after the NYPD was unleashed on the campus.

Nixon called the Columbia takeover by black and white radicals “the first major skirmish in a revolutionary struggle to seize the universities of this country and transform them into sanctuaries for radicals and vehicles for revolutionary political and social goals.” Which many have since become.

In June, Kennedy, after defeating McCarthy in the crucial primary of California, was mortally wounded in the kitchen of the hotel where he had declared victory. He was buried in Arlington beside JFK.

Nixon, who had swept every primary, was nominated on the first ballot in Miami Beach, and the Democratic Convention was set for late August.

Between the conventions, Soviet Premier Leonid Brezhnev sent his Warsaw Pact armies and hundreds of tanks into Czechoslovakia to crush the peaceful uprising known as “Prague Spring.”

With this bloodiest of military crackdowns since the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, Moscow sent a message to the West: There will be no going back in Europe. Once a Communist state, always a Communist state!

At the Democratic convention in Chicago, the thousands of radicals who had come to raise hell congregated nightly in Grant Park, across from the Hilton where the candidates and this writer were staying.

Baited day and night, the Chicago cops defending the hotel, by late in the week, had had enough. Early one evening, platoons of fresh police arrived and charged into the park clubbing and arresting scores of radicals as the TV cameras rolled. It would be called a “police riot.”

When Sen. Abe Ribicoff took the podium that night, he directed his glare at Mayor Richard J. Daley, accusing him of using “Gestapo tactics in the streets of Chicago.” Daley's reply from the floor was unprintable.

Through September, Democratic candidate Hubert Humphrey could not speak at a rally without being cursed and shouted down.

Describing the radicals disrupting his every event, Humphrey said, these people “aren't just hecklers,” but “highly disciplined, well-organized agitators. … Some are anarchists and some of these groups are dedicated to destroying the Democratic Party and destroying the country.”

After his slim victory, Nixon declared that his government would take as its theme the words on a girl's placard that he had seen in the Ohio town of Deshler: “Bring us together.”

Nixon tried in his first months, but it was not to be.

According to Bryan Burrough, author of “Days of Rage, America's Radical Underground, the FBI, and the Forgotten Age of Revolutionary Violence,” “During an eighteen month period in 1971 and 1972, the FBI reported more than 2,500 bombings on U.S. soil, nearly 5 a day.”

No, 2018 is not 1968, at least not yet.

About Patrick J. BuchananPat Buchanan

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of the new book “The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority.

  • 7 thoughts on “Is This Worse Than ’68?

    1. I find it amazing that there have been no defensive shootings of Antifa thugs, yet. If they keep it up, there will most likely be at least one. The restraint being practiced by the CCW community will go only so far.

      Phil in TX

      1. CCW folks are not aggressive. In fact they are very cautious. If the leftist Atifa press any of them beyond reason then it becomes an issue of self defense and the result will not be peasant for the aggressors.

        1. You are right, CCW holders are NOT aggressive. I’m sure you’ve seen that stats showing that they’re 6 times more law-abding than even police officers are. But most people in the U.S. don’t understand, and think otherwise (“people are afraid of that which they don’t understand”).

          Note that a CCW holder who was forced to defend him-or-herself against a violent, fascist, Antifa aggressor might be HAILED in TX or ID — but would be JAILED in OR or CA. (it already happened in Portland, and that CCW holder did not even fire, only brandished his firearm to break out of a situation where he was surrounded and threatened). There is no standard treatment for self-defense.

    2. Pat 2018 is not 1968, at least not yet but I feel it will be worse.With te proliferation of CCW folks like me won’t stand for road blocks, threats to person ad family, malicious property damage et. al. No one is looking for trouble but if trouble seeks them out it will be dealt with accordingly. Even if it means just making a scary noise to sort things out.

      1. No warning shots, that will just give the corrupt govt an opportunity to charge you. A warning shot means you are not in fear of your life which means they will charge you as the aggressor.

    3. The biggest difference now is the widespread practice of CCW in most of the country. I believe this will discourage the radicals, somewhat. We shall see.

      1. That is true, in parts of the country. Perhaps true in “most” of the county (area-wise).

        But it is not true (yet) in most of the country, population-wise. Many metro areas, esp on the populous coasts, are rabidly anti-firearms, so *NO* kind of carry is permitted, neither concealed nor open. Anyone reading this understands that is a clear violation of “shall not be infringed”, but believe me, most of the people in those areas don’t understand that.

        Therefore, the radicals are understandably unconcerned about the spread of CCW, since most of the places where they plan to have radical protests/riots, there is NO legal form of carry.

    Comments are closed.