Prodding Trump’s EPA to Reexamine Endangerment

Opinion by William L. Kovacs
Use external pressure to overcome Administration inertia on reviewing Endangerment Finding.

Bogus Research
Prodding Trump’s EPA to Reexamine Endangerment

USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- Campaign rhetoric strongly suggested that the Trump Administration would redress the Obama Administration’s insane attempts to regulate every aspect of society in a futile attempt to control nature and climate. President Trump withdrew from the Paris Accord, initiated repeal of the Clean Power Plan, sought a reasonable replacement for the plan, and turned off the regulatory fire hose. Great start!

But two years in, it is clear that the administration has stalled on dealing with the most significant part of Obama regulatory overreach: the 2009 Endangerment Finding – the Environmental Protection Agency’s declaration that plant-fertilizing carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere threaten the health and welfare of current and future generations.

While the Finding itself does not impose any new regulations, it does provide the administrative basis to justify a massive number of regulations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Moreover, data and facts asserted as supporting the Endangerment Finding (EF) drive many climate change studies, including the November 23, 2018 study titled Climate Change Special Report – Fourth National Climate Assessment Authoritative Report on the Science of Climate Change with a Focus on the United States.

Most unfortunate of all, while the evidentiary basis for the Endangerment Finding was subject to informal public comment and the scope of the Obama era Clean Power Plan was enjoined by a court, the studies underlying EPA’s Endangerment Finding have not been subjected to outside, independent expert analysis, nor tested in the rigors of cross-examination in a court or courtroom setting.

Simply put, without independent testing of the factual claims establishing its Finding, EPA retains the power to regulate all energy-producing and energy-using activities throughout the United States – and thus to regulate our production, consumption, transportation, employment base and living standards.

Since the climate change issue could not be resolved when the Republicans controlled both houses of Congress and the White House, it is even more improbable that a divided Congress could ever reach a compromise. Even worse, while EPA talked tough on climate change in the early days of the Trump Administration, it has since hung a “Do Not Disturb” sign on its front door.

So, what can citizens do in the next two years, knowing that neither Congress nor the administration will act to critically examine the supposed “facts” set forth in EPA’s Endangerment Finding?

My moral code prohibits me from saying “there is nothing we can do.” So I will set forth some modest proposals that can be taken up by younger people who have the energy and willingness to discover, highlight and dramatize the true facts and evolving knowledge underlying the science of climate change.

First and foremost, EPA must release all of its climate studies. It might surprise some, but many of the foundational studies have never been publicly released or are so old they are corrupted. In a similar case, amid my 20-year effort to obtain the “Six-City” health study, EPA told me in the late 1990s that the information belonged to Harvard University. A few years later, when I sought it under the Data Access law, EPA said information in the studies was developed before 2000 and the law was not retroactive. The Bush administration responded to my FOIA with documents that were so redacted that the only readable words were the “to” and “from” on the first page. And finally, the Obama administration told me the studies could not be produced because the information is now too corrupted to be usable.

But this is not about the lack of transparency in government. It is about obtaining and analyzing EPA’s climate data and studies, so that the science underlying the Endangerment Finding can be tested. That means you should not pre-judge any of the studies. You must let the analysis of facts in the studies be your guide. This is essential, because otherwise environmentalist groups, the news media, left-leaning politicians and others with a stake in the 2009 Finding will paint the entire effort as an attempt to destroy the planet and human civilization.

This search for the facts is crucial since establishing the facts is essential for developing the right policies for now and for after the Trump administration is gone. If the science proves the EF is solidly supported by the evidence, we will all know that we must develop and implement the very costly policies needed for mitigation. If the facts prove the Finding is faulty or highly uncertain, then the nation could save trillions of dollars by not implementing numerous useless projects.

Here are my suggestions:

  • 1) File a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requesting from EPA a list of all climate studies it has undertaken and links to the electronic version of the Endangerment Finding studies. A citizen friendly EPA should be most willing to provide the list of and link to the studies.
  • 2) Should EPA provide this list and links, scientists from around the world could review the quality of the studies by evaluating them under the standards of review set out in the OMB Information Quality Act (IQA) Guidance Document: peer review, objectivity, reproducibility and similar standards. There are likely thousands of studies, so the essential first task is to identify the most influential studies, of which there are likely only a few.
  • 3) A similar request could be filed under the Data Access Law for studies performed after 1999.
  • 4) For the most influential studies, request that EPA provide the underlying data so that the actual data can be tested in accordance with the IQA Guidance Document. The government paid for and owns this data, so it should be available to citizens to test its reliability, reproducibility and the peer review quality.
  • 5) When the most influential studies are identified and the underlying data secured, hire a team of forensic data scientists to analyze the data used in EPA’s studies, to determine whether the studies’ authors used the data properly … or used them in ways that supported a personal bias. For the most influential studies, the forensic data team should also review the emails that relate to the government study.
  • 6) Concurrently, a group of non-scientists should compile a list of the scientists who performed the studies, the amounts the scientists were paid, potential conflicts of interest, the total number of federal grants each scientist received, and the qualifications of each scientist working on the climate studies.
  • 7) Establish a review board of independent, non-political climate experts to determine the soundness of the facts underlying the Endangerment Finding. If the facts are sound, the matter is settled.
  • 8) If the facts are judged not to support the EF or if they establish a high degree of uncertainty, then it is essential that a Petition for Rulemaking be presented to EPA to conform its Endangerment Finding with the data. If it is granted, then the process of getting the facts corrected will start.
  • 9) If EPA denies the petition, the matter should be taken to federal trial court to challenge the arbitrariness of EPA’s decision. Keep in mind: this crazy idea to challenge an EPA denial of a petition for rulemaking in court is exactly the process that environmental groups used to win the Massachusetts v. EPA case in the Supreme Court. Just don’t forget – you need to include a few states to have standing to sue.

What is outlined is a long, long shot. It requires that EPA make government-owned scientific data available to the public for review. It assumes the Trump administration will be open to such a process and can make it happen in two years. It assumes that funds can be raised to hire the best scientists in the world to analyze the facts and defend them in court, if necessary. Finally, to paraphrase Colonel Jessup in the movie “A Few Good Men,” it assumes that both sides will be prepared to handle the truth.

But at least we will all have attempted to find the truth behind the Endangerment Finding, so our country will have the best information possible on which to make some very expensive and far-reaching public policy decisions.


William L. Kovacs was active in national policy issues for over forty years. He served as a senior vice president for environment, technology and regulatory affairs for a major business trade association, as chief counsel on Capitol Hill, as chairman of a state environmental board and as a partner in several Washington, DC law firms.

  • 7 thoughts on “Prodding Trump’s EPA to Reexamine Endangerment

    1. There is another conspiracy with the Global Warming/Climate Change reports..
      The old weather reports were “cleaned” by the groups who claimed to be digitizing old printed news archives and the microfiche archives.

      The digital records don’t match the weather, I personally remember from the reported National and Local news broadcasts, from the winter of 1982 and 1983.
      I worked in the oil/gas field and remember nearly freezing to death.. jumping up and down all day while working, to stay warm.
      We were also told to leave the engine running when we left for the day, with the draw-works locked out to prevent against vandalism, on the oil rig because it was too cold to start it other wise.
      It took a bunch of tarps, tented over the engine, with two large Salamanders, eight hours to start the Detroit 8v71 engine. The engine oil was so cold it wouldn’t pour. It was as viscous as peanut butter!

      The National/Local news outlets reported that the winter temps of ’82 & ’83, broke cold weather records over a hundred years old, and named it the coldest winter of the century. They also called Christmas, the coldest Christmas on record… These cold weather records were a true event all across the northern hemisphere, globally…
      The available digital news records from NOAA, Farmer’s Almanac, etc… have all been changed from the records I remember. I used interlibrary loans to obtain records of the Leader and the Kalkaskian.. It’s the local news paper from Kalkaska, Michigan.
      It is a “little convenient”, that all of the paper’s legends and the weather reports are missing, from all of the requested date ranges between 1982 and 1983.
      Multiple other news outlets I requested data from all reported the data isn’t available any more…

      Jan 19, 1983, in Kalkaska , Michigan, the thermometer outside my kitchen window read -56 below zero. The news reported that day the temperature was about -48 in town and the windchill was -110 below zero.. That winter there was a whole month, that the High temp for the day, never got above -30!
      I remember; because it was the year, and the particular day, my oldest daughter was born. I was worried about my car not starting to take my wife to the hospital to give birth.

      I don’t trust any of the so called sources that are being used to promote or prove the climate changes, when all the original records I am familiar with have been falsified.
      They won’t even talk about the activity with-in the “Ring of Fire” as a primary source of the climate changes… The ground and air temps; are affected by the moving of the tectonic plates and the friction/heat it’s creating is forming magma and volcanoes, awakening many of the volcanoes around the world, especially in the past ten years.

      This volcanic activity is raising the air and ground temps and is primarily responsible for melting of the ice caps. Not burning carbon based fuels.
      The old geological records taught us that the ice caps melted 10-15,000 years ago and formed the Great Lakes… Long before crude oil was ever discovered.
      Plastic/pollution in the oceans is contributing to the ocean temps staying warmer than normal.. The volcanic activity warms the water; from the earth being warmed under water, along with lava flows, and the plastic is hindering the circulation of the ocean water to cool it down.

      Just skimming the ocean surface helps, but is failing to remove the plastic.. It is the sunken plastic that is causing most of the ‘baffling’ of the ocean currents..

      Ground and air and ocean temps are also increased by deforestation; natural/man-made fires, and excessive clear cutting, along with indiscriminate building practices…
      It causes increased flooding from rain/storm run-off, which also raise the ocean levels; because the water is not retained in the watershed by the forest to slowly fill the underground aquifers.

      There is also some discrepancies in the ‘Industrial Age’ records that they use to promote the climate change theories..
      They omit the factual data from the ‘scientifically unaided’ experiences of warming, reported by civilians from the Solar flare “Carrington Event”…

      1. p.s.
        I didn’t mention, or try to calculate, the amount of ocean water that is displaced by soil erosion, or the volume of tons of plastics/trash that is contributing to sea levels rising!

    2. The facts are what someone says they are. Information like history can be slanted by anyone. Unfortunately we live in a society that if it’s printed, it must be true.
      Usually agendas are the drIving force which fantasy becomes reality. Governments are notoriously efficient at running propaganda and passing it off as truth. Conspiracy theorists are born from so call facts that are proven to be lies.

    Comments are closed.