New Zealand Mass Murderer’s Primary Goals: Gun Control in the United States

Opinion

New Zealand Mass Murderer's Primary Goals: Gun Control in the United States
New Zealand Mass Murderer's Primary Goals: Gun Control in the United States

Arizona -(Ammoland.com)- -The mass murderer in New Zealand was not an ordinary active shooter. He is a political terrorist who is working to advance a political agenda. One of his primary goals is to further gun control in the United States. His manifesto clearly states that goal. From The Great Replacement:

Finally, to create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural,political and racial divide within the United states.This conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.This balkanization of the US will not only result in the racial separation of the people within the United States ensuring the future of the White race on the North American continent, but also ensuring the death of the “melting pot” pipe dream.

The mass murderer studied the mass media, perhaps better than most political terrorists do. He saw their prejudices, their agendas, and structured his attack to use their weakness for his purposes. From his manifesto:

Why did you choose to use firearms?

I could have chosen any weapons or means. A TATP filled rental van. Household flour, a method of dispersion and an ignition source.A ballpeen hammer and a wooden shield.Gas,fire,vehicular attacks,plane attacks, any means were available. I had the will and I had the resources.I chose firearms for the affect it would have on social discourse, the extra media coverage they would provide and the affect it could have on the politics of United states and thereby the political situation of the world.The US is torn into many factions by its second amendment, along state, social, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.With enough pressure the left wing within the United states will seek to abolish the second amendment, and the right wing within the US will see this as an attack on their very freedom and liberty.This attempted abolishment of rights by the left will result in a dramatic polarization of the people in the United States and eventually a fracturing of the US along cultural and racial lines.

His study of the Media in the United States revealed to him the Media uses mass shootings to push for gun control in the United States, and elsewhere in the world. He wants the United States to balkanize. He re-emphasizes the point:

Won’t your attack result in calls for the removal of gun rights from Whites in the United States?

Yes, that is the plan all along, you said you would fight to protect your rights and the constitution, well soon will come the time.

The mass murderer has little in common with Second Amendment supporters. He wants state control of the economy, partly for purposes of ecology, much like current Progressives and Socialists in the United States and Europe. He insists on the identity politics of race, much like the Progressives in the United States. He wants to end the “melting pot” of the United States, much as the Progressives insist on maintaining separate ethnic and racial identities in the United States. Second Amendment supporters welcome all who support and defend the Constitution, regardless of race. He detests President Trump as a leader. He does not like President Trump's policies. The only thing he likes about President Trump is that President Trump is white. From his manifesto:

Were/are you a supporter of Donald Trump?

As a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose? Sure. As a policy maker and leader? Dear god no.

His inspiration is the political terrorist who he has emulated, the Norwegian mass murderer who is in prison. Anders Brevik murdered 77 people, of which 69 were from a youth camp for the far left Norwegian political parties. Brevik wanted to stop the Muslim colonization of Europe. From the manifesto:

Were your beliefs influenced by any other attackers?

I have read the writings of Dylan Roof and many others, but only really took true inspiration from Knight Justiciar Breivik.

The mass murderer is clear that he is not a conservative. He is not a fan of limited government. He calls himself an eco-fascist and considers the political structure of Communist China as the closest political structure to his ideas. From the manifesto:

Were/are you a fascist?

Yes. For once, the person that will be called a fascist is an actual fascist. I am sure the journalists will love that. I mostly agree with Sir Oswald Mosley’s views and consider myself an Eco-fascist by nature. The nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the People’s Republic of China.

Sir Oswald Mosley was a prominent National Socialist in England before and during the Second World War. Modern “Communist” China is necessarily a National Socialist political system. The party running China makes the trains run on time.  The Chinese Communists call their system Socialism with Chinese characteristics.

To modern Progressives, with their identity politics and commitment to state control, the murderer's manifesto will appear confusing. The murderer calls for more state control of the economy and calls himself an eco-fascist. The National Socialists in Germany were lovers of nature. The murderer's manifesto will be confusing because, while he operates from identity politics, his identity politics are the opposite of current Progressive's identity politics. He sees white people as the oppressed, endangered minority in the world.

Muslim terrorists wish to spark an all-out war with non-Muslims. The terrorist in New Zealand has the same goal from the opposite perspective. He wants to inflame a defensive battle by non-Muslims against Muslims who are invading the west.

After the terrorist attack on 911, I wrote the Muslim attackers were not cowards. From their perspective, they were courageous and dedicated warriors.  Cowards do not take over airliners and fly them into buildings on a suicide mission.

New Zealand Bloody Flag
Muslim terrorists wish to spark an all-out war with non-Muslims. The terrorist in New Zealand has the same goal from the opposite perspective. He wants to inflame a defensive war by non-Muslims against Muslims who are invading the west.

The more intelligent, committed, and coherent political terrorists are, the more dangerous they are. This attacker was/is more dangerous than most. He claims the attack was planned over two years, and was in retaliation for terror attacks by Muslims. As a more general note, he says his attack is in retaliation for 1300 years of Muslim aggression, conquest, and murder.

Here is a prediction, based on the murderer's agenda. The firearms he used will be found to have been manufactured in the United States. That works to advance his goal of pushing the Democrats in the United States to enact strict infringements on the Second Amendment. [And we can be sure that they will take the bait.]


About Dean Weingarten:

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30-year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

  • 43 thoughts on “New Zealand Mass Murderer’s Primary Goals: Gun Control in the United States

    1. The left doesn’t want to end the melting pot, they just want to end the white race. White genocide is the world’s goal. AKA, Diversity. No ? Then why is it only white European countries need this diversity ? Why not Asia, Africa, Middle East, or Central America, for example ? It is only white countries they push the “melting pot” on to. When you folks wake up to what’s really going on, we’ll be better off and truly prepared for the future. Please, don’t believe that your government cares about you or your family, they do not.

    2. This article says this was planned and staged for 2 years. Seems to be a coincidence that five countries sent spies to a secret meeting in New Zealand in 2017. That meeting also included from the US, the FBI and the CIA higher ups.

    3. He wants to end the melting pot like progressives? You dumb fucker, the melting pot means a mixing of all peoples. Progressives don’t want to end the melting pot. I love guns and I’m left as fuck. It doesn’t mean you need a fucking ak for Christs sake. Get a 10/22 and stfu.

      1. Hmmm, so you say you like guns, and then follow that up with telling people what they can and can’t have. I’m calling BS. You are clueless.

      2. Maybe you should move to a “better” country with a Bill of Needs. Did you know that semi-autos like the AR and AK are seldom used in murders, and handguns are the most used ? The treasonous communist media like to make it sound like they are used more than they are. Your 10/22 will be on the table too along with bolt action “sniper” rifles. Don’t believe it, then just check out what your party is talking about now. take you r”need” argument and stick it, the reason for the 2nd Amendment is for the citizens to be able to protect themselves and this country. From the looks of the treasonous communist/dem party and what they demand these days, anyone with at least 2 brain cells can see why they hate the 2nd Amendment

        1. Well said your right on with your statement I believe in the 2nd amendment and will defend it and we need to stand united against the commies/ demorats and push their agenda back down their throats if not we will be in another civil war and it’s coming

      3. The Ammoland author clearly states that progressives use identity politics and want to keep different races divided along racial lines to keep us all divided. A true melting pot wouldn’t do that.
        Secondly, It’s the bill of rights not the bill of needs you dolt. I need an AK to defend myself against stupid fucks like you. You sit there and state get yourself a 10/22 because it’s just as effective as an AK. So why not own an AK? Idiot!
        The truth is that the left wants your guns period. The fact that you align with the left and claim to be all into guns while making a statement about not needing to have an AK just shows how fucking stupid you actually are politically. Go lick some more boots of those who would like to see you disarmed so they can control your cuck ass!

      4. There is more people killed by cars than by guns and that is by far a year. A lot more. So should we ban cars? Of course not. This is just left wing trying to take away a right and not going to happen. 80 million gun owner strong!

    4. A totally staged attack.WATCH THE VIDEO IN SLOW MOTION,when the shooter is outside shooting you can see the shell casing being ejected and vanishing in thin Also video shows the alleged victims being shot with no relex or movement when shot,also no bullet holes in the walls.Plus video shows the so called hero dad outside the mosque lying down and dead but it dhows him texting.WWW.BRIGHTEON.COM HAS THE VIDEOS.this is nothing but a gun grab which the people of NZ fell for.

      1. The smoking gun [magazine]

        The New Zealand shooting video is fake. There are plenty of mistakes in the raw footage video including already stacked bodies, only certain bodies had blood and gore, buzat the smoking gun.. or should I say smoking ammo magazine that was planted before the event even started. The video [16.55 minute] is still widely available with a simple google search. Take a look at 6:53 when he looks down, on the green floor half way down the hall when he first walks in, the clip is almost touching the wall and walks right by it. Then at 8:32 when he picks it up and loads it. End of discussion. All truthers should be focusing on this simple observation alone. It shuts down all arguements on the whole massacre. The aftermath videos don’t even match the original scene.

      2. @Dan, Yup, that’s the reason why the gov made it illegal for anyone there to have a copy of the video. They don’t want their subjects to figure it out.

    5. I agree with the points set forth in the article except for the statement about the Muslim terrorists having committed 9/11. I don’t think they did. I think 9/11 was an inside job. A good book to read that addresses how they pulled part of it off is Rebekah Roth’s Methodical Illusion. Another is the Terrorist’s Timeline (forget author just now), and Judy Wood’s book What Happened to the Towers? Good photographs in there, especially of the antenna disintegrating into dust.

      1. @Kathy…Check out LCfor911.org, website of the Lawyers Committee. They are sister org of Architects & Engineers. On 3-25-19, yesterday, they filed suit against the FBI to force them to include evidence they intentionally left out, such as the voluminous reports of bombs going off. They also left out all reference to the “Dancing Israelis” aka the “High Fivers”. And they have been the cause of a Special Federal Grand Jury that is now investigatung the crimes of 911, in the Third District of NY. NO, DAMMIT, WE ARE NOT GOING TO LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT !!!!!

    6. There is a pattern too many are afraid to follow}
      https://www.timesofisrael.com/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-suspect-reportedly-visited-israel-in-2016/
      ===========================
      MOSSAD operation – — OH HO! The fifth suspect of Christchurch shootings has defected to Israel https://intellectualobserver.com/the-fifth-suspect-of-christchurch-shootings-has-defected-to-israel/
      The fifth suspect of Christchurch shootings has defected to Israel
      POSTED ON MARCH 16, 2019 BY NEWSNERD
      A suspect confronted the court, two other under investigation; reports about another suspect who left for Israel faces the silence of authorities.
      ================
      http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/…n-control-campaign/
      Jewish organizations pride themselves on gun control stances that date back to the early days of the debate, following the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and of President Kennedy. Most played a supportive role in passing legislation then limiting access to weapons, and have since reaffirmed their commitment to reducing the availability of guns.
      ==================
      http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/02/17/jews-and-jewish-organizations-lead-the-gun-control-campaign/
      Jews and Jewish organizations lead the gun control campaign
      Kevin MacDonald on February 17, 2018 — 35 Comments
      Given the Parkland shootings, I thought it appropriate to rerun this article, originally posted on January 1, 2013. See also Andrew Joyce’s article, “Jews and gun control: A reprise.”

      1. You wrong!!! There is necessity to know motivation and reasoning for such adverse action to avoid misusing bare fact of this happening by politicians – especially be anti 2nd amendment gang!!! And, BTW, is the Muslim colonization of Europe, US, Australia, NZ, Canada not the fact? Is 1300 years of Muslim aggression, conquest, and murder not the fact? Is the killing of the tens of the thousands of Christians in the islamic dominant territories in Africa and Middle East not happening now? Isn’t the trend to make white people the oppressed, endangered minority in the world not happening now?

      2. People who would do this evil already have access to his manifesto. I don’t doubt that he made sure of it, which is easy to do today. We need to know what he was thinking so we can be better informed. Would you trust the MSM and politicians to spoon feed you a summary? Their insight into this evil is predictable and already revealed: “White man bad. Gun bad. Anti-semitism acceptable. Islam good. Orange man bad.”
        We need to know whether evil people were rational to know whether the atrocity was random insanity or reasoned evil. We need to know the ideology to identify it in others and, hopefully, quell it.
        If you don’t know what the Nazis and Communists believed, how can you expect to identify it and substantiate the danger to others before they come to murder us? Those people were just as evil and have murdered hundreds of millions.

      1. He’s in jail right now currently complaining that he isn’t being given his rights. He’s lucky he wasn’t shot dead. I’ll be surprised if he survives more than a few months in jail.

    7. Our right to have guns to defend ourselves, family and friends will no longer be a right of ours if we will not stand up for them. Hitler decided to disarm all those who were not German as well as those German who did not follow his policies. He decided who lived and who would not. Laws have been passed for a child to be murdered up to and including the day of his/her birth. Today a person who commits a crime, rape murder torture etc., has more protection from the courts, government, that the person who is raped murdered tortured etc. Our right to bear arms is our right. our rights are not gifts that can be taken back. That civil war people are saying will take place some day, its already here. Those of us who want to use the right to bear arms and do bear arms should do so without having someone in the government give permission to do so.

    8. The statement _ a civil will come to be _ is already here. The division between race, religion, politics, finance, age health etc.. is here. Is here right now. The first thing Hitler did was to disarm the people. Our government, dems, have been trying to pass the same law for many years. Many states have already passed bills laws to disarm the people that live In them. In the end Hitler decided who lived and who died. And millions died. Our government has already passed law that an unborn child can be murdered up to the day of his/her birth. And millions have died. Sad part of this there are people who have decided to follow along like sheep. Those who have decided to not follow along as sheep are considered to dangerous, untrustworthy, irresponsible people. All of this has already been happening. To me the phrase Stand Your Ground means more than the government allowing us to protect ourselves it also means to protect ourselves from those who wish to remove our right to think and live as we choose. This may sound extreme, look at what has already taken place I the past, look at what is taking place right now and look into the future what our government wants to happen. To look into the future all a person has to do is look at what laws bills today are on the desks of the government and what those will mean to our way of life if passed. People need not only look at how not standing up for our rights make life for us. We need to look at what kind of lives are children, grandchildren etc. will live based on what we do now.

    9. Absolutely NOT surprised something of this nature happened to the Muslim community somewhere in the world. As horrible such an action is I can only say the Muslim Terrorist brought this to their own community in retaliation for all the horror the Muslims inflicted upon other humans. Retaliation does not make any such actions right. I will say, I was surprised where it happened. I would have thought in a European country or even a Middle east country. Will it happen again?..Yes, unfortunately most likely from either side of the theological ideology spectrum. Gun Control!!..Hate to tell all these governments gun control will NOT work except against responsible citizens. You can bet your last penny that the Gun sellers dealing the worlds black market are just sitting, planning for gun control to go into force. Why? Because the GUN BLACK MARKET just boomed. It will happen.. In foreign countries its easy to obtain a weapon on the black market.

      1. You can buy an AK 47 in any Middle East country for a 20 dollar bill or less, gun laws are meant for honest citizens not criminals who don’t give a shit about laws.

        1. @Wynn…you mean they have more rights and freedoms than we do ? It’s no wonder that our gov attacked them, then.

    10. My question is WHY ON THE MOST PART ARE THESE SHOOTERS STILL ALIVE ? EVER HEARD OF BODY COUNTS ? This country is one with strict gun laws and just proves that if a criminal wants a gun they don’t follow any rules and they’ll find a way to get one!!!!!!!!! The thought is if we hadn’t stepped in in WWII they would be speaking Japanese now? Came from Australia, did his Mass Murder with a weapon that could not be owned in Australia where did it come from, Puff it just happened to fall into his hands??

    11. Obviously, the shooter was not familiar enough with the U.S.A. The Democrats here are already doing everything he stated he wanted to accomplish.

    12. Democrats really didn’t need his help, but them sharing his goals and judging by their reactions, they are obviously happy to have it.

    13. Democrats really didn’t need his help dividing America, but sharing his goals and judging by their reactions, they are obviously happy to have it.

    14. As much as I love Dean, I have to disagree with the title. His primary goal was to polarize the US along racial lines. He believed that by triggering the political left into more gun control he would force the hand of right leaning white gun owners resulting in a civil war that would divide along racial lines.
      Gun control or the “attempt” at gun control was merely the means by which he would hasten a division and therefore, preservation of the White race.

      1. Exactly. The goal isn’t to ban guns; the goal is to ban guns to the point that it creates a racially-driven civil war.

        His purpose is to mitigate immigration’s affects on native populations, even if such a goal results in massive loss of life.

        1. The problem with his theory is that in fact the devide on guns in the US is a political divide, not a racial divide. Black Americans are no more likely to give up their guns than White Americans.

          1. It’s not my theory, it’s his.
            Black owners can prove him wrong and I’d celebrate it all day long, but he’s largely spot on. Widely speaking most gun owners in the US are white, fact of life.

            1. All the more reason to continue to welcome our “brothers and sisters in arms” with open arms. We may have some differences in social identity but a unified front on the Second Amendment will go far to healing the divisions in our country that is the primary goal of Socialist Democrats’ Identity Politics game

    Leave a Comment 43 Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *