No Notoriety for NZ Killer

Art by Michael Ramirez

No Notoriety for Killers
No Notoriety for Killers

USA –-( No Notoriety for NZ Killer.

NZ Judge Paul Kellar allowed journalists to use cameras & shoot video in the court but said the killer's face must be pixelated.

Did you enjoy this cartoon?

You call yourself pro-gun? Prove it by joining any one or all of these fine civil rights organizations:

Give Me Liberty or Give Me Obamacare
Give Me Liberty or Give Me Obamacare

And, please consider support for the Second Front in Defense of the Second Amendment:

About Michael Ramirez

Two-time Pulitzer Prize winner, Michael Ramirez, combines an encyclopedic knowledge of the news with a captivating drawing style to create consistently outstanding editorial cartoons on Ammoland Shooting Sports News.

“An editorial cartoon is not just a funny picture,” says internationally known editorial cartoonist Michael Ramirez. “It is a powerful instrument of journalism, sometimes sharp and refined, its message cutting quickly to the point, and other times, blunt and overpowering, seizing the readers' attention with its dark imagery.”

Visit :

Share this page and help spread our pro-gun, conservative message with humor.

AmmoLand Join the NRA Banner
AmmoLand says Join the NRA
  • 13 thoughts on “No Notoriety for NZ Killer

    1. He was trying to tie the names associated with other people/instances of violence, and the Parkland incident with these in NZ..

      Creating a Kamikaze celebration of spiritual darkness…

    2. I believe it is so true, give them a name and you give them an identity . They should never be named or have their face shown, that way they will remain invisible for life.

    3. The media wants to publicize all of these idiots. They want to convince the world that anyone who owns a firearm is dangerous. The danger comes from the media and the damn democrats. Both want as much bad publicity as possible to achieve their goal which is TOTAL DISARMAMENT of the people. That way only the police and the military plus “privileged democrats” will be armed. Remember the old wrinkled diane feinstein wants to take away our rights to have a CCW but she will keep hers. AN UNARMED CITIZEN IS A SUBJECT LIVING IN BONDAGE. Even the former congresswoman gifford has a AR-15 in her house.

    4. If his name, face and his manifesto are erased, how do we learn from this episode? I am seriously concerned that the main stream news media, which clearly has an anti-gun and anti-individual liberty agenda, has complied with suppressing the manifesto, but have also freely quoted from it. Frankly, I do not need a reporter from any of the news outlets to interpret for me what the terrorist said. I have seen snippets, reportedly from the manifesto, claiming the terrorist was in favor of the political system of the Peoples Republic of China. That makes it difficult to understand the label of Right Wing Extremest. Let me read the manifesto and let me decide for myself.

      1. You’re right. If the only ones who see the killers manifesto are the ones that control the narrative, they will say anything they want. I’ve read most of it. In it he says he’s neither left or right wing, but his social and political beliefs are most closely resembling those of the People’s Republic of China.

      1. Catchphrases, Propagandist babble intended to displace rational thinking with irrational thought. I count three here, “white terrorist”, “places of worship” and “innocent people”. After un-displacing my thinking, I have interpreted your meaning. That is that a person displaying Caucasian features wantonly attacked and unlawfully killed undefended people inside and around a structure. This is the first thing that that attracts my attention. Now, if my attention is keep, I will seek more information from sources not using catchphrases.

    5. NZ will come to regret the day they started down the road to MORE gun regulation. Are they to stupid to look at Chicago and NYC to see that more gun control laws do NOTHING, except make the trugs stronger.

    6. They know what’s best for us. Symptomatic of a nanny state that NZ is. Travel to Beijing and Shanghai and you’ll be hard pressed to view all your favorite gun sites. I’ve tried.
      Jefferson: “I prefer a dangerous freedom over a peaceful slavery.”

      1. There will always be those who choose to abuse freedom and liberty for evil. It’s the danger of living in a society that has a Constitution with a Bill of Rights. The ONLY alternative is to eliminate freedom and liberty for all, the path which NZ has chosen and which many see as preferable for America. Folks, the struggle, the fight, maybe even the war is coming. With which side will you stand, Freedom and Liberty or the safety of chains and tyranny?

        1. Doesn’t sound very safe to be in chains. I guess it is choice of sink or swim. We can only advise those that choose chains, they will sink. Last friendly warning to the unfriendly.

    Leave a Comment 13 Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *