Disputed Facts in the Gun Debate

Would another law make us safer?

U.S.A. –-(Ammoland.com)- The gun debate is difficult for many reasons. It is often an emotional issue. Unfortunately, there isn’t one gun debate, but perhaps dozens of “gun debates.” Even the questions that seem simple are difficult to answer well.

  • Are guns too easy to get?
  • Does a firearm in your home put you at greater risk?
  • How often do ordinary citizens defend themselves with a firearm?

A simple answer is easy to find.. and often wrong. There are questions hidden within questions as we look for the truth.

Is the US violent because of civilian gun ownership?

For some people, the gun issue is one of appearance. Many legal residents own guns here in the USA. We also see lots of news coverage when innocent people are shot. We don’t read about the violence in other countries, so we assume that other countries are peaceful. We put these facts together and conclude that guns cause violent crime here in the USA.

It turns out that our news is biased in favor of reporting local violent crime. Other countries have violent crime also, but you have to look to find it. What is unusual, is that only a few cities in the USA cause most of our murders. To be precise, two percent of our counties have 51 percent of our murders. 54 percent of our counties have no murders at all.

The stereotype of gun owners is a rural farmer, but it is our failed inner cities where we see the most violence. Bad governance causes violent crime, not guns.

Are guns too easy to get?

You might think it is easy to buy a gun if you’ve never done so. There are 23 thousand firearms regulations. Most of these restrictions have no effect on violent crime. The reason is that 99 percent of criminals get their firearms illegally. Passing another gun law doesn’t change the behavior of criminals, and criminals are the ones who commit violent crimes.

If you think it is easy for an honest citizen to buy a gun, then I encourage you to try and buy one in California or New Jersey. Criminals don’t have to wait for a 10 day waiting period or a one-gun-a-month delay. It can take you months to buy a gun legally, while a criminal gets a new gun in an hour on the street. Gun laws don’t stop criminal behavior.

Does a firearm in your home put you at greater risk, or does it make you safer?

There are hidden layers to that simple question. Most criminals run away when they find out you’re at home. Most criminals run away when they see the homeowner or shop owner has a gun for self-defense. Was that an example of armed self-defense even if gun owner never pressed the trigger?

It turns out that criminals behave toward us the same way they behave toward the police. Like us, the police will touch their firearm dozens of times yet never have to press the trigger as they face a violent encounter. The policeman thinks things would have gone very differently if he were unarmed. Likewise, criminals behave differently when they have unarmed victims.

Many homeowners don’t report that they had a gun in their hand when the criminal ran away. Most law enforcement agencies don’t keep statistics on civilian self-defense. That means it is hard to get solid data when guns save lives.

We also have dirty data when it comes to firearms accidents. Did a child find an improperly stored firearm and hurt someone? We want to keep our guns away from our children and unauthorized strangers.

Unfortunately, we get confusing reports after an accident involving a firearm. Was the gun improperly stored by the legal gun owner, or was the gun stuffed under the couch cushions by a criminal who was visiting his girlfriend for the night? Did children find the gang’s gun that was hidden under the front steps? Was the unauthorized person who got the gun your 4-year-old who found it in the dresser drawer, or a 19-year-old burglar who smashed his way into your house and used a pry bar to open your lockbox? The data is often confusing since both are described as a negligent discharge of a firearm by an unauthorized minor. We don’t want to lump these events together since the cure for each is dramatically different.

How often do ordinary citizens defend themselves with a firearm?

From the best data that I can find, self-defense is rare and accidental injuries with a legally owned firearm are extremely rare. Most “injuries” with a firearm are suicide by middle-aged white men. From a perspective, about one-out-of-5-million children will find and misuse an improperly stored firearm this year. About one-out-of-200 of us will use a firearm to legally defend ourselves or another innocent party. That means your legally owned gun makes you safer. With a little education, some training, and safe storage, your gun makes you much safer.

I wish I had short and simple answers to the gun debate. I chose to give you the best truth I have even though it took a little longer.



About Rob MorseSlow Facts

The original article is here. Rob Morse writes about gun rights at Ammoland, at Clash Daily, and on his SlowFacts blog. He hosts the Self Defense Gun Stories Podcast and co-hosts the Polite Society Podcast. Rob is an NRA pistol instructor and combat handgun competitor.

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Wild Bill

President Trump has nominated an anti-gunner to lead the ATF. His name is Chuck Canterbury. Canterbury has a long track record that should concern gun owners: He’s testified before Congress to support anti-gunners Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Attorney General Eric Holder. Under his watch, the FOP backed Congressional measures to expand the unconstitutional and failing NICS system — which is the same system where 95% of the initial denials are false positives. And on the state level, the FOP under his watch has supported Universal Background Checks and opposed Constitutional Carry. Please contact your U.S. Senators and urge… Read more »

Michael J

Statistics are as ambiguous as the source reporting them. We choose to believe or discard what we receive, however politicians and bureaucrats play on those false narratives to stir the frenzy of those who cannot think for themselves. For some reason when statistics are quoted everyone swallows the B.S.

Wild Bill

@Mike J, You are quite right about statistics, and that is why stats can not be used in court unless both sides agree in advance. Imagine both sides agreeing.


The website world life expectancy ranks the US 47th in suicides, 46 countries have a higher suicide rate than the US and have very strict gun controls..then researching suicides I found out the American Indian has the highest suicide rate and its illegal to have a gun on the Reservations…The US is ranked 88th in death by violence, 87 countries have a higher murder rate than the US and have very strict gun controls, simply put, people easily find other ways to kill themselves or others


One website posts the United States as 45th of 118 in ranking of violent crime, with these caveats: people in some countries are much more likely to report a crime than in other countries data could be forged by governmental institutions data are not available for most of the world Another site ranks the U.S. 14th in murders, but does not mention that 68% of the murders in this country are committed in 5% of the counties – and more than half of all homicides occur in just 2 percent of its counties. **“If the 1 percent of the counties… Read more »