Range Bill a Return to Legitimization of American Gun Culture

In June, the CMP made history by firing the first successful matches on Camp Perry’s ranges using electronic targets.
In June, the CMP made history by firing the first successful matches on Camp Perry’s ranges using electronic targets.

U.S.A. -(Ammoland.com)- A nation of rifleman used to be a significant part of national defense. The bi-partisan passage of the “range bill” is an acknowledgment that promoting target practice is part of promoting national defense.

The bill is important because firing ranges are constantly under attack by those who wish for a disarmed population. The bill allows states to access excise taxes collected on the sale of ammunition and guns for the construction and improvement of shooting ranges.  From NSSF Press Release:

The Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Support Act, also known as the “Range Bill,” allows states to use their Pittman-Robertson Fund allocations to begin construction of new ranges, or improve existing state-run public recreational shooting ranges. Prior to this law’s enactment, states were required to put up 25 percent of the cost of range construction projects to access the matching 75 percent of Pittman-Robertson funds. Now, states can access those funds with a 10 percent match and will have five fiscal years to acquire land for range construction or expansion projects.

Pittman-Robertson funds are derived from an excise tax paid by firearms and ammunition manufacturers. Since 1937, the fund has generated more than $12.5 billion funding wildlife conservation and safety education programs in all 50 states. NSSF estimates more than 80 percent of Pittman-Robertson excise tax contributions are generated by sales attributed to recreational shooting. This means today’s recreational target shooter is an overwhelming contributor to conservation through excise tax support.

A recurring concern of recreational shooters, and those considering entering the sport, is proximity and access to a safe range. This new law would make it easier for states to enable recreational target shooters to enter the sport, which in turn would generate continued contributions to Pittman-Robertson funds and the conservation programs which it supports.

President Teddy Roosevelt promoted target practice as a means of preventing war and of projecting national power. From goodreads.com

“The great body of our citizens shoot less as times goes on. We should encourage rifle practice among schoolboys, and indeed among all classes, as well as in the military services by every means in our power. Thus, and not otherwise, may we be able to assist in preserving peace in the world… The first step – in the direction of preparation to avert war if possible, and to be fit for war if it should come – is to teach men to shoot!”

President Roosevelt understood that theory without action is impotent. As President, Theodore Roosevelt converted his thoughts into practical action. From accurateshooter.com:

In February 1903, an amendment to the War Department Appropriations Bill established the National Board for the Promotion of Rifle Practice (NBPRP). This government advisory board became the predecessor to today’s Corporation for the Promotion of Rifle Practice and Firearms Safety, Inc. that now governs the Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP). The 1903 legislation also established the National Matches, commissioned the National Trophy and provided funding to support the Matches. This historic legislation grew out of a desire to improve military marksmanship and national defense preparedness. President Theodore Roosevelt, Secretary of War Elihu Root and NRA President General Bird Spencer were among the most important supporters of this act.

President Theodore Roosevelt was following the example of England. England had created an National Rifle Association in 1860, and had promoted rifle practice with national matches before the United States NRA was formed.  From wikikpedia.com:

The NRA of England was founded 12 years before the American NRA. According to wikipedia, it was founded “for the promotion of marksmanship in the interests of Defence of the Realm and permanence of the Volunteer Forces, Navy, Military and Air”

A friend who I met in Panama, Dr. Nickolas Smythe, related to me how, as a boy,  in the 1950s, he bicycled around the English countryside with a .22 rifle on his handlebars, going to various matches, because the government wished to encourage rifle marksmanship

As technology advances, many have stated that riflemen are or will become obsolete.  The afe of nuclear weapons was supposed to make infantry obsolete. The demise of the rifleman has not occurred. In several recent conflicts, riflemen remain relevant.

While the battlefield shifts with defense and offense gaining relative strength; while smart weapons, drones, autonomous vehicles and directed energy weapons all change the battlespace; ground must still be held by men with personal weapons in their hands.

It may be, as technological development makes it harder for a conventional rifleman to survive, insurgents with concealable weapons will become more important.  They are not as easily identified and destroyed by drones or robots.

As long as human governments rule, men with weapons will be relevant.

Promoting skill in the use of weapons does more than merely increase the skill level in the population. It promotes a mindset of discipline, ordered competence, and independence. Armed men think and act differently than unarmed men.

About Dean Weingarten:Dean Weingarten

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

  • 6 thoughts on “Range Bill a Return to Legitimization of American Gun Culture

    1. Am I suspect on a bipartisan bill involving gun use? Dems are anti gun so there will be some catch to this.

    2. I’m suspect of any bill coming out of Washington. More ranges would be nice, but how will they be approved and operated? Do you have to join or sign in when you want to shoot? If so, who maintains those lists and who has access to them? In most cases, any Federal assistance in building or operating anything allows the Federal government to impose their regulations upon state, local and private enterprises. Federal assistance is interpreted by the Feds by something as simple as a phone call or a visit to a Federal agency to ask a question or seek advice.

    3. Yes, I trust the government in this… encouraging the construction of state-run shooting facilities. After all, we will need someplace to store our registered .22 target rifles when they are not being used.

    4. Hey Tucson Arizona…..how about using these funds in this ” Range Bill ” to begin construction of new ranges, or improve existing state-run public recreational shooting ranges!!!

    Leave a Comment 6 Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *