An Open Letter To The GOP On Gun Control

Opinion

Protest Speak Out Shout Activist Gun Ban Assault Weapon iStock-468765816
Protest Speak Out Shout Activist Gun Ban Assault Weapon iStock-468765816

USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- Dears Senator/Representative:

Every time a tragedy happens, you steal a slice of our rights. A silver here, a shaving there. The result is always the same. We lose our rights for meaningless laws that will not make anyone safer or criminals less dangerous. You sell our right as a PR stunt to win votes.

Fine, we all accept that sometimes that needs to happen. But how about you include OUR needs and wants as part of your bipartisan compromise. How about us (The 120,000,000 American gun owners) get our needs addressed. How about we cut a deal?

Background Checks: Sure on all sales of new or used firearms. But we want national insta-check. We want what you originally promised us. That at any gun store or police station, we can walk-in and clear the transfer in 10 minutes. You can still give a gun to a family member or lend a gun to a friend for a day’s  shooting. If we do this, we want an end to waiting periods too.

You want Red Flag: We agree, but there MUST be safeguards. Phony claims must be prosecuted; guns confiscated for legitamte claims may be held no more than 60 days. The purpose of Red Flag is to keep people safe not to punish gun owners. In that 60 day period, you’ll have time for a proper hearing. Penalize any State that exceeds these limits with real consequences.

We want CCW reciprocity. Complete a 16-hour course (The new NRA CCW course will do thank you), and you can carry anywhere in the country.

Declare all AR variants firearms ”in common use.” Better yet simply define in common use as any firearms with 1 million or more in use. End waiting period for firearms.

Any illegal alien who tries to buy a firearm should be jailed and then deported.

So – Stop selling us down the river with the assumption we’ll always be there for you, we won’t. We did not come out for Bush 41, McCain or Romney. Sell us out and well stay home in November 2020.

Got it? Give back some rights and protections for those that you bargain away.

Gun control is about scaring suburban women into voting for democrats. Renovation of the gun laws is about modernizing how guns are managed in our country.

Yours,
Don McDougall

After thoughts:

I know some of you will say no compromise, no surrender. The fact is we can do two things. Get a balance of things we want or lose it all. You blast the NRA when they build compromises, but there is a simple fact. We can get more than we give. We might with this battle, but unless we forge some common ground, we will lose the war. We need more youth shooting, more support for The Friends of the NRA. We need more high school programs and college scholarships. We need to teach the 2A to the next generation.

Right now Wayne LaPierre is the “Mad King” dismantling the NRA so to cling to power while our rights burn. (I had a Nero comparison but went with G.O.T. instead.) We’re on our own. This will be Wayne’s legacy, as the man who sold out American gun owners for his own wealth. He will burn in hell for what he’s doing. I am comforted by the knowledge that in the end, we are all dust.

Here is the site to be able to e-mail your representative, you can use the letter above as a model or write your own. Be polite and professional. At the end of the day, we have the constitution and the people on our side. Do not let cowards give away our rights. To do that, YOU personally must get active. God bless you and god protect our republic.

https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials/


About Don McDougall

Don McDougall
Don McDougall

Don McDougall is an NRA instructor and member of the Los Padres “Friends of the NRA” committee. If he's not at the range, you will find him setting the record straight with on gun issues and gun safety on AmmoLand Shooting Sports News.

Subscribe
Notify of
90 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Country Boy
Country Boy
1 year ago

better yet , delete most of current laws, save for a few…… and then let’s just go by:..” the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”….. “

Firewagon
Firewagon
1 year ago

Been saying, essentially, that very thing for decades now. It is hard to agree, however, with “Give back some rights and protections for those that you bargain away.” or, “….we all accept that sometimes that needs to happen….” Uh, not so much! Giving the “gun grabbers” an inch does nothing but invite them to reach for that ‘mile’ mark. Which of those 20,000 odd gun laws, on the books, helps ‘gun owners’ in any way? Some gun owners actually cheered the most recent SCOTUS finding/decree that the people actually have the right to “keep and bear” a gun. Note, however,… Read more »

Tank
Tank
1 year ago

Until Americans start calling out the Deep State FALSE FLAGS & Crisis Actors that are real, the same FEMA Drills continue to influence the ignorant & emotionally triggered individuals via Media Events of propaganda. Not sure why False Flag has such a stigma. I learned about them in the US Public School System when the US taught God, Country, Family & self.

Operator Z
Operator Z
1 year ago

Not compromising or obeying any unjust laws. Too far is too far. It’s time to tell them to all kindly f$&k off.

Mike
Mike
1 year ago

No, No & No. No more concessions about our 2nd, 1st, 4th or any other amendment.
Hell NO!!!!!!!

b68g
b68g
1 year ago

i cannot get behind the red flag law smacks too much like (THE MINORITY REPORT AND THAT PRE CRIME BULLSHIT) are we gonna do away with the constitution. the ERPO is attacking both the 2nd and 4th amendment to the constitution of the united states. AND BELIEVE ME IT WILL NOT STOP THERE

Circle8
1 year ago

Red Flag laws deny our citizens their rights as given to them by the Bill of Rights. They are deemed guilty and penalized without having the opportunity to defend themselves or challenging (facing) their accuser. They are denied representation and other rights that are provided for in the constitution BEFORE a trial. What the hell is going on in our country when a citizen can lose their property on just the word of someone who makes a statement, true or not. Then a judge or whom ever makes a determination based on the opinion of ONLY ONE PERSON who may… Read more »

Tionico
Tionico
1 year ago

No, Don. Just plan old ordinary vanilla NO. Backgound checks… take the present database at NICS, make it universally availalbe by phone and online to anyone selling a gun. Enter name precisely as on buyer’s Social Security Card, enter Date of Birth,state of resiudence, and if desired, last for of SSN. NO INFORMATION ON WHAT IS BEING BOUGHT. This is a background check on the person acquiring the gun, not on the gun itself, right? System returns Deny or Proceed, and a number. Seller records that number if desired. He now KNOWS the buyer is not disabled, and can be… Read more »

Whatzit
Whatzit
1 year ago

This truly scares and depresses me. Where do these phony-baloney “gun rights supporters” come from? NO gun law is constitutional. NO compromise. Someone else said it – compromise is when both sides give up something they want in order to get something they want. What the hell do we get here? All you are proposing is to take the Neville Chamberlain approach and give the hyenas a steak so they’ll leave us alone. That’s crap. We are where we are because we keep surrendering a little here, a little there… This is a war. The goal is complete disarmament. Any… Read more »

Vanns40
Vanns40
1 year ago

Don: Your type of attitude started in 1934 and, with more than 22,000+ firearms laws, has landed us right where we are today. My questions to you: 1. Are any of the arms laws now or in the past effective at stopping criminal activity? 2. Do arms laws presume innocence or guilt of the person who wishes to obtain arms? If guilt, is that not contrary and therefore against our system of justice? 3. Throughout the history of the world would you agree or disagree that ALL arms laws have, ultimately, been used to subjugate people to a wannabe tyrant… Read more »

Will
Will
1 year ago

In regards to ERPO’s,Don talks about protections against abuse ? Bullshit,don’t buy that for a second ! DUE PROCESS IS THE PROTECTION !

JMR
JMR
1 year ago
Reply to  Will

@USA The 2A isn’t gun control, its government control.

jack mac
jack mac
1 year ago

No law restricting the the right to arms should exist, much less be enforced. NONE. The free flow of arms within our population is the only tangible means for the people to control governments. Compromise to allow new and more oppressive right restrictions!! We should be staunchly demanding past laws be repealed. The American people have already lost control of the news media to the oligarchy who own it. We should not allow our public servants to become or continue to be our masters. Without media to wage an anti-propaganda campaign, we are in a too week position to even… Read more »

Wild Bill
Wild Bill
1 year ago

, Throw out our Second, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Ninth Amendment Civil Rights through some statute? Are you mad? These Civil Rights are designed to restrain government interference in out lives. Diminish a Civil Right, and unchain government.
Background check to give or will my firearms to my son? I know him better than any bureaucrat ever could. Why not go back to something that really works to prevent crime … swift, and sure punishment?

So many others have covered this, I really had no need of writing, but I just could not restrain myself.

option31
option31
1 year ago

So here we are, the organization that claims to support our rights is waving the white flag and raising their hands before the troops have even amassed to fight. Thank you know who that we are not overseas in a real war with thee people as commanders. We need a complete overhaul of the NRA board, with leaders like this we have everything to loose and will loose everything. At this point one has to ask if their are moles in the Negotiating Rights Away. As a lifer since 1978 I have become more and more disappointed with the NRA.… Read more »

Get Out
Get Out
1 year ago

Yea, like when the anti-gunners said we don’t want your hunting rifles, pistols or shotguns… now they want them all. Not interested in anymore gun control compromises.

Dave C
Dave C
1 year ago

Where did you get this WE shit?

Ryben Flynn
Ryben Flynn
1 year ago

Sorry, Don. We gun owners have compromised MORE than enough since 1934.
Cake And Compromise – Illustrated Guide To Gun Control
http://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/2013/11/08/cake-and-compromise-illustrated-guide-to-gun-control/

HoundDogDave
HoundDogDave
1 year ago

“…If we do this…”

Makes me think of an old boss of mine who was fond of saying “Who is this WE you speak of? Do you have a mouse in your pocket?”

I am not part of this WE that’s for sure. No UBCs, No ERPOs, No more compromise.

Phil in TX
Phil in TX
1 year ago

Thanks, Don. I copied this letter into a file on my PC and after modifying it slightly, will be sending it via the link you supplied.

Phil in TX

JT
JT
1 year ago

“We can get more than we give.” Provide proof! Do we have more now than we did before? I think not. The key word is “can”. Yes, it is theoretically possible that a ‘compromise’ might some day favor us. I have my doubts. ‘Compromise’ does not mean that instead of giving in 100%, you only give in 50%. Compromise means that you get something you want and they get something they want. Our situation is complicated by the simple fact that we really only want one thing, i.e. for our rights to remain uncompromised. So, by definition, we can not… Read more »

JDC
JDC
1 year ago

How about intrusive, universal background checks for politicians and their families? After all, it isn’t a Constitutional right to hold public office.

TexDad
TexDad
1 year ago

Definitely not with you here. Making deals that allow gun control is not just stupid and how we got here in the first place, it’s a betrayal of the Constitution and our core values.

Capn Dad
Capn Dad
1 year ago

Tired of compromising. Where in the second amendment does it say the right to bear arms is conditional? Nowhere. Compromise means losing something. Keep compromising and eventually you lose it all. Cowards and appeasers compromise on constitutional rights. Patriots don’t compromise.

Knute
Knute
1 year ago
Reply to  Capn Dad

Actually, “compromise” means to GIVE UP something, in order to GAIN something else. I’ve no problem with compromise itself. The problem here is; What are the antis offering us, IF we should agree to give up something? For example, IF (if. hypothetically…) we were to agree to UBC what are THEY willing to give up? I might agree to that if I was to gain the repeal of the NFA, which is obsolete and stupid anyway. But, to my knowledge no anti has ever given up a single thing… EVER! Their idea of compromise is everybody lie down and let… Read more »

Bill
Bill
1 year ago

Well put. Well thought out and on point. The GOP needs to argue, and fight and accept nothing less than clear language stating these red flag laws conditions so they’re not abused, or rather we are not abused by them.

Wild Bill
Wild Bill
1 year ago
Reply to  Bill

, The Bill of Rights already precludes so called red flag statues. If one supports red flag statute, he must reject the Bill of Rights. If one supports our Civil Liberties in the Bill of Rights, then he must reject so called red flag statutes.

BowserB
BowserB
1 year ago

Slightly off topic. One thing that should be apparent from the threat of Red Flag law is that your gun ownership needs to be your business only. Neighbors, casual friends and acquaintances, co-workers…none of them should know that you own a gun. A couple of my close personal friends know I have some guns and a License to Carry–but they are also gun owners. We go to the range together from time to time. No one else needs to know, as there is absolutely no possible advantage to me or my family, from other people knowing I own a gun.… Read more »

Operator Z
Operator Z
1 year ago
Reply to  BowserB

When I lived in California it was like that. Here Tennessee it is opposite. Don’t be fooled by the anti gunner rhetoric. There are plenty of folks who own and shoot guns. Staying silent is exactly what the ant gunners want us to do. Be vocal.

TexDad
TexDad
1 year ago
Reply to  BowserB

Gotta go with Z on this. I used to think this way. Now I see that we are losing ground by being forced into the closet.

Now this is my general reply.

Yes, I am a gun owner. I have had many, for a couple of decades now, and none of my guns have ever endangered a single person, nor will they, unless that person threatens life or liberty.

RoyD
RoyD
1 year ago

It lists Don as being a “NRA instructor” as if that is supposed to mean something. What a joke. I agree with most of what has been said in the rest of the comments. No compromise!

hippybiker
hippybiker
1 year ago

We’ve been bending over and comprising with these slime balls for 85+ years! Has it gained us anything? Hell No, I’m personally tired of being scapegoated for what no good criminals and sick asshats who are looking for eternal infamy do. Time to stand up and tell them to FOAD!

Will Flatt
Will Flatt
1 year ago

The lesser of two evils is STILL EVIL. Compromise is STILL Negotiating Rights Away. Mr. McDougall, your Neville Chamberlain ‘strategery’ is exactly what we don’t need right now.

No compromise, no surrender, no compliance. No more infringements. PERIOD.

The American patriot is ready for another Revolution. Compromisers are modern day Tories and deserve the same thing in 2020 as they did in 1776.

So you can take your suggestion, sir, AND STICK IT!!!

Will Flatt
Will Flatt
1 year ago
Reply to  Will Flatt

Absolutely. WWG1WGA!

jh45gun
jh45gun
1 year ago

This sort of compromise crap from the NRA and some of its members is why I just let my membership lapse and am joining the GOA!

Green Mtn. Boy
Green Mtn. Boy
1 year ago

Mr. McDougall

I read that the reason the NRA wouldn’t get involved in other questions of Constitutional debate was because the organization had but one of the amendments to represent,the 2 nd.

You may think giving in on the infringement of at least 7 amendments rights is for you personally,or the organization but I will thank you Not To Bargain Away My Rights.
Not One More Penny to Negotiating Rights Away !

Will Flatt
Will Flatt
1 year ago
Reply to  Green Mtn. Boy

ABSOLUTELY RIGHT – An assault on one Right IS AN ASSAULT ON ALL OUR RIGHTS!!!

Captain Witold Pilecki

NFW!! Repeal all 23,000+ INFRINGEMENTS across the nation, leaving the only legitimate gun law, that restricts government…The Second Amendment.

Anything less is unacceptable to this peaceable (for now) citizen.

Patrick Sperry
Patrick Sperry
1 year ago

Talk about flipping… No, no more, not one inch! Restore our rights, all of them. Get rid of NFA, GCA 68, and the 86 abomination. I am tired of sellouts, and this Life Member is tired of the NRA negotiating away our freedoms.

Some guy
Some guy
1 year ago

NO! We have given so much already for NOTHING in return. NO MORE DEALS. If they allow anything to pass or be signed we stay home on election day!!!! State and federal….. Since we are going to get the same result either way, pull their greedy mouths off the public teat if they betray us.

Laddyboy
Laddyboy
1 year ago
Reply to  Some guy

@Sg; “we stay home on election day”. Sir you must belong to the (DNC)=democRATic National Communist party. I WILL NOT “stay home”. You WILL see me at the voting booth come election day as long as I am breathing. I REFUSE to capitulate to those who WANT Dedicated, Educated Law Abiding American Citizens to surrender MY vote to those who want to “fundamentally transform” America into a communistic ameriKa!

JMR
JMR
1 year ago
Reply to  Laddyboy

, what are you 5? democRATic … really?

John H
John H
1 year ago
Reply to  Some guy

Staying home on election day is the best way to make sure that the scum sucking democRATS take over and shove their bull shit down our throats !! What we need to do is vote against every democrat and every compromising RINO !! When all else fails lock and load !!

Dave C
Dave C
1 year ago
Reply to  Some guy

I WILL NOT STAY HOME ON ELECTION DAY and guarantee a win for the Democrats! Short sightedness is what got us into this mess!

Donttreadonme
1 year ago

You do not speak for everyone, we do not want red flag laws. You cannot have one right and not another. Red flag laws violate due process and the Second Amendment. We do want National reciprocity, but forced training is not something you should have on a right, otherwise it’s just a privilege. I agree that every responsible gun owner should seek training, but it should not be mandatory. If our lawmakers want people to have training so badly then they should offer government-funded training classes so that people who can barely afford to get by can still get training… Read more »

Nanashi
Nanashi
1 year ago

If you can compromise on the Second Amendment, as the NRA helped the Democrats do in ’34, you can compromise on the Thirteenth, as the Democrat party did in ’42.

BowserB
BowserB
1 year ago
Reply to  Nanashi

For those unaware–and possibly myself, if my assumption is incorrect–your reference to 1942 would be to the internment of Americans of Japanese descent. Indeed, the proposed red flag laws are exactly the same thing although to an obvious lesser degree–both are punishment without due process, which is also a violation of the 5th and 14th Amendments. And I’m pretty sure the NRA was “OK” with the ’68 and ’86 laws and probably the Clinton “assault weapons” ban. There is a reason “NRA” is suggested to stand for Negotiate Rights Away. As long as Wayne’s perks are not infringed, the NRA… Read more »

Sisu
Sisu
1 year ago

This essay is wanting for a compelling argument: “Get a balance of things we want or lose it all.” … McDougall, if you do not intend to defend your “God given (or ‘natural’, if you prefer) rights.” get out of the way … stop consuming oxygen the rest of us need. … Sounds like you took “Jill Biden’s Course: The Anointed Know Best: Politics and Compromise –You Need US to ‘WIN’. Consequences to You Don’t Matter to US.” I am challenged to justify continuing financial support for the NRA. The NRA is presenting too many questions as to whether they… Read more »

BowserB
BowserB
1 year ago
Reply to  Sisu

I’m a member of both GOA and SAF. Neither are without faults. GOA is big and getting bigger, so closer scrutiny is called for. SAF only bothers me in the area of cases selected to challenge. The two that have come to my attention in the last couple years have been non-citizen resident aliens’ rights. Personally, I can’t imagine there are so few citizens’ rights infringements that it is necessary for SAF to pick resident alien rights cases to address. I’m also a member of TSRA (Texas State Rifle Assn.) Texans’ rights are really under attack by the same kind… Read more »

JMR
JMR
1 year ago

Dear, GOP
Despite what is articulated in this article, I do not agree with much of anything said here.
Here’s the simple fact, the Second Amendment does one thing, limits the government on all thing regarding Arms.
Therefore, every current gun control law is unconstitutional, all future gun control laws are unconstitutional. So quit breaking the law by passing unconstitutional regulations.

No law will prevent someone who wants to do something bad from doing it.

BowserB
BowserB
1 year ago
Reply to  JMR

Exactly. How many guns were employed in the first WTC attack, the 9/11 attacks, the USS Cole, or Oklahoma City? OTOH, there were a lot of government guns at Ruby Ridge and Waco.

JMR
JMR
1 year ago

I dont accept that something needs to happen. There’s an old saying,the path to hell is paved with good intentions, doing something to do something is idiotic.

hoss
hoss
1 year ago

NO!

ras52
ras52
1 year ago
Reply to  hoss

Hoss, I agree with you.

Some guy
Some guy
1 year ago
Reply to  hoss

Agreed! NO MORE BAD DEALS.

Will Flatt
Will Flatt
1 year ago
Reply to  hoss

RIGHT!! NO MORE!!

POLITICIANS, no more infringements, or 2nd American Revolution!!
CHOOSE NOW!!

USMC0351Grunt
1 year ago

Benjamin Franklin once said: “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” McDougal? In this day and age? THIS makes you a PUSSY! No compromise! Not now, not ever. Time to push back harder! And, the “New NRA CCW Course”? Are you freaking kidding is? Consult with the over 22 MILLION combat trained Veterans in how to shoot! EVERY “course” I ever had to attend, I was always called out to reach the way the U.S. Marines, “do it?” You suck at being a brown noser and you have absolutely… Read more »

Patrick Sperry
Patrick Sperry
1 year ago
Reply to  USMC0351Grunt

This Jarhead Brat agrees with you MARINE!

Superman
Superman
1 year ago

With friends like Don and the NRA, who needs enemies?

StreetSweeper
StreetSweeper
1 year ago

UBC’s are de facto gun registration, it will not work without it; so, no. You may give away all of your rights you wish Don, but you may not give away mine. I see nothing in your proposal that criminals will obey. How about it, how will you force criminals to register their guns?

Ryan
Ryan
1 year ago

Red flag laws should and must be found unconstitutional. If there is imminent danger or a creditable threat the police already have the right to act on it. I understand that we all want to prevent nutjobs from committing horrific crimes, but I cannot support taking away our individual liberties to do so…
We have the 4th, 5th and 6th ammendments that guarantee our rights, so that the government can’t just take our property without probably cause, when a nameless person reports someone that may own a gun. Our 2nd ammendment rights must be protected.

ace_m82
ace_m82
1 year ago

Totally wrong.

Actual answer: Shall, Not. Be. Infringed.

Molon Labe

JIAZ
JIAZ
1 year ago

I’ve never seen any organization like the NRA where the Executive Staff (i.e.employees) runs the Board, controls the Board, and tells the Board what to do.
Wayne LaPierre and his complicit cronies set up and perpetrated a fraudulent system, pyramid scheme, whereby they stole untold millions from the membership to enrich themselves. Wayne LaPierre is the NRA’s Bernie Madoff.

Will
Will
1 year ago
Reply to  JIAZ

I’m really looking forward to seeing lapierres name become a number.

Will Flatt
Will Flatt
1 year ago
Reply to  Will

For betraying Americans’ gun rights, WLP belongs at ADX Florence.

Magnum
Magnum
1 year ago

Well thought out and written article but you can drop ME from YOUR WE, too much compromise is what started this landslide! Congress is totally inept regardless of party yet you seem to think they can actually produce a sensible bill of any kind much less one regarding firearms, that Sir is a joke. I have had CCW licenses for over 15 years and I am now licensed in 3 states with training at the ranges and in the classrooms for every one of them, I don’t feel the need for another course to have reciprocity. There will never be… Read more »

Ryan
Ryan
1 year ago

A couple constructive comments: Silver-> sliver. Gun control is about scaring most suburban voters, not just women. They try to base gun control on fear to convince everyone on an emotional level and instead of the facts.

Drake
Drake
1 year ago

This article right here is a prime example of why we keeping losing. None of this is “compromise”. All of this is, “I’m going to take this away from you, and you better pray I don’t take anything else”. We do not want red flag laws, UBCs, or any other gun control bill in exchange for something that you know we won’t ever get. Compromise is always them getting 99% of what they want and us being lucky to get 1%. It wasn’t “compromise” in the 90’s over the Brady Bill. It was them originally wanting 10 days for the… Read more »

Will
Will
1 year ago

JOIN GOA ! THE ONLY NO-COMPROMISE GUN LOBBY IN WASHINGTON !

Will
Will
1 year ago

,you say,”You want Red Flag:,we agree, but there MUST be safeguards” ? NOBODY WANTS ERPO’s ! Who in the hell is this “we” ? There is no support for the NRA ! They have betrayed the 2A and members for the last time !

jack mac
jack mac
1 year ago
Reply to  Will

Will, hope it is the last Doug betrays us, but it is doubtful.