Hold Your Tongue & Give Up Your Guns! The Mantra Of The Radical Left Progressives

Opinion

American Flag Barbwire Secert Lists American Flag Barbwire iStock-955397728
Hold Your Tongue & Give Up Your Guns! The Mantra Of The Radical Left Progressives

New York – -(AmmoLand.com)- The radical left spreads hatred and violence, not peace and community as they thrust their value system on everyone else.

“He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion. . . . Nor is it enough that he should hear the opinions of adversaries from his own teachers, presented as they state them, and accompanied by what they offer as refutations. He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them. . . he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.”

“If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.” ~ John Stuart Mill, Quotations from his work, “On Liberty

Radical Leftists Seek To Control The Narrative And Silence All Debate

The Democratic Party’s Radical Left contingent and the Radical Left’s sympathizers in the Press and the polity, namely those who espouse the tenets of Collectivism, contend that they ground their policy choices on morality, asserting the point vociferously—believing, erroneously, that spouting vitriol serves better to convince the public than appealing calmly to reason.

All the while, these Radical Leftists maintain that Conservatives—those espousing the principles of Individualism as manifested in our Constitution, upon which our free Constitutional Republic is grounded—are a reactionary force, out of touch with “Neo-modernism,” and that the Conservatives’ policy positions are decidedly immoral.

But, is that true? Which ideological perspective really fosters amity and which one fosters enmity?

Contrary to their assertions, it is the ideology of the Radical Left and the Progressives that is decidedly immoral, not the ideology of Conservatives. And, it is the Radical Left and Progressives that foster enmity among the polity, and, through the device of “identity politics,” which the Radical Left and Progressives concocted, they demonstrate a desire not to bring the Nation together, but, rather, to divide it. They seek to create hatred and fear, hoping that, through the divisions, they deliberately create and foster, they can eke out a victory for the Democratic Party in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election. And, the Radical Left and Progressives have a very powerful ally in the Press. Since assuming the mantle of the U.S. Presidency, the Press has waged an all-out war against Donald Trump, and those who support him.

Instead of reporting the news and informing the public on the important news events of the day, the mainstream media has engaged in a constant, massive disinformation and misinformation campaign in a naked and despicable attempt to destroy the Trump Presidency, attacking the very institution of the Presidency. The mainstream media is actively supporting the Democrats’ attempts to transform our Nation into a system that is completely at odds with the tenets of Individualism upon which our Constitution and upon which our free Republic rests.

The Radical Left and Progressives that have taken over the Democratic Party adhere to the tenets of Collectivism, upon which the Radical Leftist political, social, and economic systems of Marxism, Socialism, and Communism are grounded. And the Radical Left and Progressives would have the public believe that these political, social, and economic systems–operating through massive Government enterprises, unwieldy, corrupt dictatorial regimes, that persevere only by force of arms, offering nothing for the populace but oppression and misery–are a positive force for good, when the opposite is true. And, these Radical Left systems, Marxism, Socialism, Communism are hardly new inventions. In fact, they are deeply flawed and decidedly and decisively unethical, outmoded political, social, and economic philosophical systems that have failed and have failed miserably in those Nations that have attempted utilization of them,* but which the Radical Left and Progressives, with the assistance of the Press, seek to resurrect from the dead. What they propose for our Country is not subject to criticism and not open to debate. And, that fact, too, is consistent with the Radical Left systems of Marxism, Socialism, and Communism. In part, this is due to the weaknesses of the intellectual underpinnings of those systems. Close scrutiny opens up the weaknesses of the systems to the light of day, and that is not something the proponents of those systems want. And, in part, the weaknesses of the Radical Left Collectivist systems of Marxism, Socialism, and Communism, are symptomatic of the psychological makeup and predilections of the proponents of them. As the Radical Left has little regard for people, perceiving them to be random bits of energy that need constant guidance and control, like so much cattle that must be corralled, lest they run rampant and amok, destroying the well-engineered, tightly controlled society the Radical Left envisions for them, the totalitarian State will falter, totter and fall. Thus, the populace cannot be left to their own devices in society to be erected. That society demands uniformity in thought and conduct. No dissenting comments or criticisms are permitted. It is no wonder, then, that the Radical Left and Progressives in our Nation are pressing forward with their goal of admitting millions of illegal, poorly educated aliens into our midst, as they have, then, the kind of people, they want and the kind of population they need for the sort of society they desire, a society comprising a multitude of mindless serfs who willingly allow themselves to be led so long as the Government provides for their basic physical needs. Such is the Nation they will thrust on all Americans. And the last thing the Radical Left and their Progressive cohorts will abide by is an autonomous, independent-minded, critical thinking citizenry that happens to speak their mind and maintains an arsenal of firearms and ammunition, informing the Radical Left and Progressives who it is that is really in charge, and for whom this Nation truly exists.

Not surprisingly, the founders of our Republic, the framers of our Constitution—both Federalists and Antifederalists—rejected the Collectivist ideology and the systems so grounded on that ideology, out-of-hand. as the Collectivist vision of a society, top-down rule, and strict control over the populace, was not something they envisioned for our Nation, certainly not something they wanted, and, in fact, something, that they absolutely deplored. Why, then, would anyone, after 200+ years of a successful powerful and free Nation that the founders of our Republic gave us, wish to reverse that course? Is it because these Radical Leftists and Progressives really believe our Nation is grounded on immorality, or so these Radical Left politicians say? And it may be that some of these politicians do believe our Nation is predicated on unethical, immoral tenets. But, if so, these Radical Left and Progressive politicians have a very odd notion of morality.

The oddity of the Radical Left’s morality is reflected in their policy choices. Grounded on the ethical system of Utilitarian Consequentialism, the Leftist extremist and his cousin, the Progressive, do not look to the motives, the intentions of a person’s actions, when ascertaining whether an act is considered morally good or morally evil, but, rather they look to the consequences of one’s actions—and only to the consequences of one’s actions.

Thus, for the Radical Left and for Progressives it isn’t the person who is the subject of blame for the harm he or she does to another person; not really. Rather, it is the result of a person’s action—the consequences, alone—that is deemed to be morally good or morally evil. Further, Leftists infer that it is the negative consequences that one’s harmful actions have upon society as a whole. rather than the impact of the negative consequences on another individual that is considered the seat of the immoral conduct.

Thus, for the Leftist Extremist and Progressive one’s conduct, good or bad, is a function of the effect that a given behavior has on society as whole, irrespective of the impact of the conduct–namely the harm imposed on another or benefit derived–that is deemed important in a determination of what constitutes good, morally correct, conduct and what constitutes evil, immoral conduct.

For more on this see the Arbalest Quarrel article, “Guns, Knives, and Occams Dangerous Razor,” posted on June 1, 2014, and reposted in Ammoland Shooting Sports News, on June 2, 2014, under the title, “Coffee Conversations with the Anti Side.


*Even in the Scandinavian countries, especially Sweden, that the Radical Left here refers to as an example of a social and economic system that works, Socialism is not all that it is cracked up to be as reported by the website, frontpage.

Further, it must be pointed out that the Scandinavian Countries like Sweden are Countries with a small, homogenous population, unlike the populations of the United States and Russia. In fact, it has become apparent that, with Angela Merkel’s influence, the EU has been flooded with millions of refugees, primarily from the Middle East. The political and social and cultural background of these people are extraordinarily rigid. They have no concept whatsoever of the philosophical principles of Ancient Greece and Rome, upon which the culture of Western Nations are grounded, and have shown no propensity to assimilate. In fact, these Middle Eastern refugees have demonstrated a perverse desire to force their own radical social and cultural theocratic value system onto their host Countries, rather than complying with the laws of their host countries, and inculcating the traditions and culture of their host Countries and

Understandably, the Scandinavians are not amused by what they have experienced with a flood of Middle Eastern refugees into their Country. Moreover, the apparent Socialism of Sweden—see Forbes article—that might have some efficacy in a small homogenous society like Sweden breaks down quickly when a heterogeneous population is inserted, unceremoniously into the Nation, and is immediately looking for, and even demanding, “handouts.” Even the left-wing weblog, Courthouse News Service, that expresses concern over the rise of “Nationalists” in Sweden, admits, if only grudgingly, that the welfare system of Sweden is crumbling in part, at least, because of the presence of so many unassimilable refugees.

Now imagine the impact of millions of illegal aliens in the U.S., and the Radical Left’s argument for a massive increase in the welfare state even as the debt in this Country approaches $1,000,000,000,000! As the Economist Milton Friedman warned, as reported in the website, daily hatch,

“It is one thing to have free immigration to jobs. It is another thing to have free immigration to welfare. You cannot have both. If you have a welfare state, if you have a state in which a resident is promised a certain minimum level of income or a minimum subsistence regardless of whether he works or not produces it or not. Well, then it really is an impossibility.”

You have to ask yourself, do Radical Leftists, like U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, who welcome an endless progression of illiterate, illegal aliens, and an expansive welfare state, know what this bodes for our Nation? For the U.S. Senator, he likely does know. Senator Sanders is intelligent. To realize his dream of a Socialist State in America, he wishes to destroy the Nation as a Free Republic, and rebuild it in his image of a magnanimous Socialist Utopia. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, unlike Sanders, is a moron, but simply abhors America and seeks, as well, to destroy it, in order to transform it into a massive welfare state. If they, both of them, have their wish, our Nation would indeed be destroyed. But, no Phoenix would arise from the ashes of that destruction, as they wrongly presume would happen.

No!

The Nation would be ruined forever; the remains to be subsumed, albeit it in a diminished state, into a new, transnational, supranational political, social, economic, cultural, financial and legal system of governance, likely headquartered in Brussels, which is the very heart and brain of the monstrosity known as the EU, and the people of those nations and of our Nation, too, will be reduced to penury and servitude, and all subjects, of this new world order (no longer citizens of their Nations as Nations will no longer exist), will live under duress, and under the severe and stern hand of an all-seeing, all-powerful Government, watching one’s every move, and controlling every thought.


Arbalest Quarrel

About The Arbalest Quarrel:

Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel’ website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

For more information, visit: www.arbalestquarrel.com.

7 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
nrringlee

It is not just about guns. It is about everything. This cultural revolution we are facing is for all the chips, all of your liberties. And the democrats are not your only adversary. The progressives (vast majority) in the Republican Party have stripped more liberty from you than the dems could have ever dreamed of. Think about that the next time you go through fatherland security screening at an airport.

nrringlee

Slight edits suggested. Use the term “Progressive New Left” in lieu of “liberal or “radical.” The New Left conquered the progressives in the Democratic Party in the late 1970’s and the Democratic Party is now owned, lock, stock and barrel by the Progressive New Left. Labor and Farmer Labor Democrats are tolerated and exploited as useful voting blocs but they are not in any position to influence policy. That is why so many of them defected to Trump in 2016. Your reference to Mill is brilliant. In my discussions with contemporary conservatives and libertarians very very few know or understand… Read more »

Vern

Very well said, looks like we went to the same school, Semper Fi

willyd

Sit back and watch the over view of all of these Demo-Rats and other fools that want everything for nothing,with no work involved, I have never seen so many people that are miserable and want everybody else just as miserable as they are, I don’t think any of them ever has a good day unless they are putting the screws to somebody to make them just as miserable as they are!!!!!!!!!!!

Vern

As I have said before; socialism/communism equals anti-Christ.
Excellent article, brings more to the table that we can learn from and speak it to our neighbors and friends who don’t understand what we are up against.
The left is concentrating on destroying themselves and they don’t have enough sense to even realize it.

Will Flatt

Leftists are traitorous domestic enemies of liberty and all that is good and decent. I’ll be happy when they start their civil war so we can physically remove them from this great nation!

gregs

the education system in America is used as a propaganda machine by the leftist to push their agenda, from telling children (up to 26 years old like in Obamacare) that guns are bad and kill people, America is bad because we had slaves, it is wrong not to let everyone into our country, there are multiple genders and you can choose and change your sex etc. when has the left ever complained about the rising cost of higher education? they the leftist politicians and world government want the citizens to be uneducated so they are easier to convince that what… Read more »