Justice Department Rules Fix NICS Act A Success

Opinion

Background Checks
Justice Department Rules Fix NICS Act A Success

USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- In March 2018, President Trump signed into law the NSSF-championed Fix NICS Act. This bill, and versions sponsored by Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), and Reps. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) and John Culberson (R-Texas) in their respective chambers, was aimed at ensuring relevant state and federal agency records are submitted to the NICS database. Sen. Cornyn named his legislation after NSSF’s ongoing FixNICS® campaign, which has changed the law in 16 states resulting in an increase of more than 240 percent of disqualifying adjudicated mental health records submitted to the FBI.

The U.S. Attorney General was charged by the Fix NICS Act to assess the plans and efforts of federal agencies, states, and tribes to improve record submissions. The Attorney General is also required to publish a semiannual report on compliance with the Act. The first of these reports was recently released and, while it is early in the implementation process, the results are positive.

The Attorney General received “satisfactory” compliance plans from 45 Federal agencies, all 50 states, D.C. and Indian tribal governments. Another 44 Federal agencies have certified that they have no relevant records and do not expect to create any in the future.

Better Records, Better Screening

Between April 2018 and August 2019, there was a 6.2 percent increase (over six million records) in the number of records in the three databases searched with every NICS check: III, NCIC, and the NICS Indices. The NICS Indices, the primary source for records related to mental health adjudication and illegal alien prohibitors, saw an increase of 15 percent in the number of records.

The increase in the number of records isn’t the only positive impact of the Act so far. According to the report, “The number of Firearm Retrieval Referrals (FRRs) (where a prohibited person is able to purchase a firearm because the background check could not be concluded within three business days due to incomplete records) decreased each month in comparison to the same month during the previous year, for an average monthly decline of 102 FRRs.”

Also, there was also an increase in the percentage of NICS checks receiving an immediate determination in most of the months analyzed. “With the exception of June 2018, there was an increase in the percentage of NICS checks resulting in an immediate determination compared to the previous year. Specifically, there was an average increase of 0.51 percent for each month when compared with the same month of the previous year.”

NICS Immediate Determination Rate
NICS Immediate Determination Rate

There is further evidence in the report that the Fix NICS Act is leading to improvements beyond an increase in the number of prohibiting records. A long-standing concern for NICS has been the number of arrest records in NICS without a corresponding disposition. These gaps are the source of delays as examiners must conduct research to determine whether an arrest resulted in a disqualifying conviction.

The report credits the Act with helping to close this gap: “The Act has provided the impetus for a number of agencies to review their arrest records and identify any missing dispositions. As a result, the total arrest to disposition completion percentage for all Federal agencies increased from 60 percent to 67 percent between March 31, 2018 and August 31, 2019.”

Examples given for this improvement include a movement in the U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to submit dispositions via an electronic method, rather than in a paper format.

States Stepping Up

Examples of states working to improve their record submissions include:

  • North Carolina, which “established a NICS Working Group of internal and external subject matter experts to ensure the State is doing its part to provide the NICS with more complete information…Since March 2018, the SBI [North Carolina State Bureau of Identification] has updated 284,289 criminal convictions that previously had not been reported to the national database”;
  • Ohio, which “established a NICS Working Group to assist in reporting all relevant records to the NICS. The NICS Working Group has been educating local courts regarding their reporting responsibilities to the NICS through the development of quick reference guides for each court level within the State of Ohio”; and
  • Wisconsin, which “implemented programmatic changes to require the entry of misdemeanor warrants into the NCIC. This change resulted in a 297 percent increase of misdemeanor warrants in the NCIC from July 1, 2018, to January 1, 2019. Wisconsin also has been actively submitting missing dispositions over the last year, adding more than 3.3 million to the criminal history records. On June 30, 2018, Wisconsin had a disposition completion rate of 34 percent, and by June 30, 2019, that rate had increased dramatically to 82 percent.”

NSSF is encouraged by the strong compliance by Federal agencies and states so far and hopes to see further improvements in the databases as the Fix NICS Act is fully implemented.


National Shooting Sports FoundationAbout The National Shooting Sports Foundation

The National Shooting Sports Foundation is the trade association for the firearms, ammunition, hunting and shooting sports industry. Its mission is to promote, protect and preserve hunting and the shooting sports. Formed in 1961, NSSF has a membership of more than 10,000 manufacturers, distributors, firearms retailers, shooting ranges, sportsmen’s organizations and publishers. www.nssf.org

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Vanns40
Vanns40 (@vanns40)
1 year ago

So we’ve now accepted that “prior restraint” is accepted as the new norm and you are guilty until you prove yourself innocent (through a NICS check)? Why do we accept this and why do we laud a President who, supposedly is pro-gun, for championing it? The very same President who ordered ATF to re-define the word semi-automatic and supported “Red Flag” laws which violate every tenant of due process known to exist in our system of justice. We deserve what we get.

Stag
Stag (@eriggle83)
1 year ago

So the government is telling you the gun control legislation authored by a Republican (Cornyn) and signed into law by Trump is a success? If you mean it successfully infringes on our rights then you would be correct. All arms laws are unconstitutional.

Jeffersonian
Jeffersonian (@jeffersonian)
1 year ago

“We support the Second Amendment! Now fill out this form and register all your personal information with the government!”

UncleT
UncleT (@unclet)
1 year ago

Wow, the “I support the 2A BUT” crowd is growing and they are intentionally supporting the TYRANT / Govt to deny rights of people who never committed any crimes from being armed. Incredible.

JPM
JPM (@jpm)
1 year ago

Once again, the NSSF shows its true colors supporting the government and its agencies over the rights of the citizens and the Constitution.

jack mac
jack mac (@jmac6492att-net)
1 year ago

The reason for NICS for firearm transfer is because a prohibited person underclass of free citizens exist. The purpose of the checks is to identify those not yet prohibited acquiring firearms. By allowing other free citizens to be denied rights is dooming all free citizens. Our freedom of the rights to arms is being damaged beyond repair.

Deplorable Bill
Deplorable Bill (@deplorable-bill)
1 year ago

My understanding of the 2A is such that all people of proper age and who are not in jail or the loony farm have THE RIGHT and are mandated to keep and bear arms. This RIGHT to keep and bear arms is one of the many unalienable rights as mentioned in Scripture and our constitution. Add to this, we are referred to as the militia. This infers the use of standard military arms. In further reference, one should note this nation is founded upon sound, righteous Judeo/Christian values, laws, commandments, precepts and mandates. The 2A can be found as based… Read more »

Finnky
Finnky (@finnks)
1 year ago

@USA – Alternately one can argue that “dangerous people” are precisely those who you want to arm. Do you want a bunch of limp wristed pansy’s standing sentry over you – or do you want someone capable of using all means at their disposal to ruthlessly protect you? As someone somewhere in the middle of the spectrum (not dangerous or ruthless and not totally limp wristed) – I prefer to have the tip of our spear (Spec Ops) to be composed of thoughtful, understanding dangerous men – capable of well considered ruthlessness when necessary. Would also prefer our police hire… Read more »