Virginia: Open Letter, Chairman Patrick A. Hope & Vice Chairman Jeffrey M. Bourne

Special Session and Dueling Rallies at the Virginia Capitol
Special Session and Dueling Rallies at the Virginia Capitol

Virginia – -(AmmoLand.com)- Open Letter:

Chairman Delegate Hope and Vice-Chairman Delegate Bourne;

I attended last Friday’s House Public Safety Committee’s hearing on HB 961, Governor Northam’s scary gun, magazine, and accessories ban, and I was disgusted by your management of the hearing in your respective capacities as Chair and Vice-Chair.

In the audience on either side of me were people that traveled several hours to attend that hearing. One gentleman was a business owner from a rural county who knew all too well that reliance on law enforcement to protect him is preposterous. The other was a retired officer of the Inspector General who said that law enforcement recognizes that the best deterrence to crime isn’t more law enforcement, but an armed population. As a forensic psychiatrist, I know that psychiatrists are the medical specialists that are most likely to be victims of homicide. We each have unique reasons to be armed, and because of that, we are willing to apply our time, talents, and treasure to the preservation of our rights.

Even with its current amendments, this bill turns the three of us into felons, overnight, for the possession of standard-capacity magazines and heavily, federally regulated suppressors that we purchased as law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes. It shouldn’t surprise either of you that just proposing this bill is morally repugnant to us, especially when your party voted down both Project Ceasefire and bills calling for increased penalties for criminals who commit rape at gunpoint. Your party put its sights on us, insulted victims, and gave criminals a free pass.

Adding to our outrage were the incredible lies told during that hearing. One doesn’t need to be a lawyer to understand that the Heller decision protected our right to keep “weapons in common use.” The items this bill bans are all in common use. Vice-Chairman, as a former member of the Attorney General’s staff, were you unable to correct Delegate Levine, when he said that the Supreme Court of the United States upheld these bans? What stopped you from pointing out that the Federal Circuit Courts that have ignored Heller are lower courts, and that the Supreme Court has not yet ruled on these bans? You allowed Delegate Levine to continue the buffoonery he began when he pantomimed his laughably mistaken ideas for what constitutes an “assault weapon” by allowing him the additional opportunity to display his ignorance of our courts.

Furthermore, Vice Chairman, when you said that these weapons and magazines were made for the military and should only be present on battlefields, were you aware that the Capitol Police present at the hearing were carrying Sig Sauer P320 pistols with 16 round magazines plus one in the chamber? Are the Capitol Police intending to wage war, and are they planning on turning the Capitol grounds into a battlefield? Now that your party has made the Pocahontas Building a gun-free zone, even for those of us with concealed handgun permits, why do they continue to need military-grade firepower to keep the peace? If these magazines are so intrinsically dangerous why should the Capitol Police have them at all?

Chairman, given the historic significance of this bill, it is shocking that it wasn’t first heard in a sub-committee, and it was completely unacceptable that only six (6) minutes were allotted for public dissent.

It was plainly obvious to you that the dissenters outnumbered the supporters many times over. The just and decent thing to do, prior to turning those dissenters into felons, would be to have at least let them speak. We came to change hearts and minds, but we recognize that most of the committee members arrived with orders from the Governor, who in turn appears to be taking orders from an out-of-state billionaire. At the very least, we came to bear witness to our process of government and hoped to leave assured that it continues to function as our Founders intended. What you presided over was a deliberate affront to the four hundred years of history of our Assembly. You should have been prepared to listen all day and night if necessary to ensure that every voice was heard. How great is the urgency to eliminate our rights that you couldn’t be bothered to listen to us speak? Had the two of you allowed those in attendance to speak, I doubt anyone in the audience would have said anything “disruptive” at the hearing’s conclusion. It is regrettable that they spoke out at the end, because it is as plain as day that you baited them into doing that.

What makes their “disruption” most regrettable, however, is that this monstrous bill has the fight of its life ahead of it. You rushed HB 961 through because you didn’t have the support you needed previously to get this to the Senate, and you were running out of time before next week’s crossover. It is likely to be further modified by the House. Even if the Senate Committee that receives it lets it pass, it is unlikely to pass the Senate. It certainly won’t pass unscathed, and so it will have to survive the wranglings of a conference committee. At each juncture, the few sane liberals in your party will have the opportunity to listen to their constituents and kill this bill.

Although you wouldn’t pause to let us speak, we haven’t stopped exercising our rights. Background checks for gun purchases doubled in the Commonwealth last month, and ammunition sales in deep-blue Arlington are up 339% compared to one year ago.

Do you think those Arlingtonians are only filling ten-round magazines? This bill, and its progenitor, SB 16, in turn, gave birth to the Second Amendment Sanctuary movement in Virginia. These bills mobilized many thousands who could not stand politics to become involved, because, to their amazement, rather than focusing on criminals, you chose to focus on them and their rights.

I can assure you and every member of the Assembly that we will not back down and we have the support of gun owners throughout the United States. The Second Amendment, our Commonwealth’s Constitution, the facts of civilian gun usage, and the Heller decision are on our side, not yours. When Secretary Moran greeted Philip Van Cleave (president of Virginia Citizens Defense League) and me at the NRA’s January 13th lobby day, he said that he’d see us again on the floor of the Assembly. I replied that we’d see him in court. The high court of the nation appears ready to restore the rights that have been wrongfully infringed upon by those of you who target the law-abiding and give aid to criminals. There is no shortage of your constituents that would happily be the plaintiff in … v Commonwealth of Virginia to set this right.

Respectfully yours,

Dennis Petrocelli, MD
[email protected]
https://www.linkedin.com/in/doctorpetrocelli/


19
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
10 Comment threads
9 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
13 Comment authors
RoyDDoszapStWayneSapper04Heed the Call-up Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Doszap
Member
Doszap

You were too polite I would have written NONE of your Damn business.

RoyD
Member
RoyD

Or perhaps you could have a primary care doctor like I do. Doc and I have had many discussions about firearms over the nearly twenty years he has been seeing me and my wife. I have grown old and he has grown older in those years. Saw him today about some stuff today. Enjoy life while you have it in full measure.

Doszap
Member
Doszap

Took a play out of the Dem Controlled House on the FAKE IMPEACHMENT of Trump, we’ll see how that works out for ya'(my guess and bet is grab your ankles and kiss it goodbye) in the NEXT election cycle,if you TYRANNICAL IDIOTS do not start a Revolution first.

CourageousLion
Member
CourageousLion

This guy has the right idea…

me-w-barrett-tyranny.jpg
Doszap
Member
Doszap

Some serious FEAR OF GOD needs to be shed upon these Dems.
They have finally lit the fuse,they will not believe what happens when the jig is finally up.

CourageousLion
Member
CourageousLion

He who attempts to get another man into his absolute power does thereby put himself into a state of war with him, it being to be understood as a declaration of a design upon his life; for I have reason to conclude that he who would get me into his power without my consent would use me as he pleased when he got me there, and destroy me, too, when he had a fancy to it; for nobody can desire to have me in his absolute power unless it be to compel me by force to that which is against… Read more »

Romanian-Term-Limits-b.jpg
Heed the Call-up
Member
Heed the Call-up

CL, no advocating for violence is not the solution – the mere advocacy of it could reasonably be construed as incitement to violence. We, as in other states, will not comply with unconstitutional laws and continue to use the ballot box and the courts to fight these unjust and unconstitutional laws. Marbury states any law repugnant to the Constitution is null and void – our rights and justice are on our side. We will not be the aggressors in any unjust and unconstitutional actions against us – that is what they want. We will, as the law provides, only use… Read more »

StWayne
Guest
StWayne

In an attempt to enlighten a fellow freedom fighter: If “the mere advocacy of it [to mean violence] could reasonably be construed as incitement to violence,” then it’s also true that the mere advocacy of just being there and doing nothing, could be “reasonably” construed as that same incitement. This is what tyrannical powers do: they look for evermore creative ways to control a population that they have taken dominion over. Think: Middle East. What you see before you today is only the beginning, and will run its course to the Nth degree of a political thing run amok. Stalin,… Read more »

Doszap
Member
Doszap

Who will be the AGGRESSORS when they break the LAW and come to you first?, do YOU not have the RIGHT to defend your property and lives under the 2A?. Also GOD LAW?.

Sapper04
Member
Sapper04

Heed-It is now basically too late now for peaceful resistance. These Marxists only know one thing and that is violence. That is the only way they can\will be stopped! You are taking the same attitude that the poor Jews took when shitler came a knocking! The same can be said for Dzhugashvili. You do not stop evil with pacificity! “By ballot or bullet” is a saying that is pertinent today. The ballot has failed, now it is time to expose our frighteningly resounding resolve. If lead flies, so be. If you think this is what I want, then you are… Read more »

ras52
Member
ras52

Dr. Petrocelli, thank you for telling like it is!

JT
Member
JT

Don’t let them know, the P320 has a 17 round magazine.

Dave in Fairfax
Editor
Dave in Fairfax

JT, I must be misreading this POS Bill. It looks to me that removable mag size, as long as it fits IN a handle, requires one of the other characteristics to be prohibited. Unless normal double-stack pistols have a threaded barrel, it doesn’t look to me like this applies to them. What am I missing? 401 4. A semi-automatic center-fire pistol that expels single or multiple projectiles by action of an 402 explosion of a combustible material that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine and has one of 403 the following characteristics: (i) a folding or telescoping stock;… Read more »

Doszap
Member
Doszap

I got an even better one for you, DO you know that an AR receiver is NOT a firearm under the TRUE law, although the ATF claims it is?, a Federal Judge recently ruled they are not a weapon.
Seems ATF has a dilemma on their hands.

JIAZ
Member
JIAZ

“Let them eat cake” tyrannical rule gives birth to noncompliance. Noncompliance fathers resistance. Resistance sows the seeds of revolt.

“They do this to prepare themselves to defend the family, their siblings and defend the village,” said Sanchez Luna, a corn farmer in a rugged region which five years ago formed a self-defense community police *militia* to protect itself.
Residents remain deeply suspicious of regional authorities and the smattering of local policemen in their villages, who they accuse of being the eyes and ears of the Los Ardillos.”

https://widerimage.reuters.com/story/under-siege-inside-the-mexican-village-where-children-are-armed

Deplorable Bill
Member
Deplorable Bill

Yup, tyranny. Now, just where did I see that motto about what happens to tyrants???

Arm up, carry on.

Doszap
Member
Doszap

Did you guys see the article on http://www.zerohedge.com?
Seems the Gov is fencing,adding multiples of new buildings and high fences.
Gates etc,etc. (kind of like Germany?) at 12 different closed air bases across the US, to HOUSE WHO & WHAT FOR?.
IMO, it’s not for the Corona Virus.

Baldwin
Member
Baldwin

The prompt on my screen says “start discussion”….

It takes two to have “discussion”. And the other guy doesn’t want to talk about it.
Well, come and take them!

TheRevelator
Member
TheRevelator

Molon Labe, and Liberty or Death. 🙂