FEC Complaint Filed Against Facebook for Federal Election Campaign Violations

Journalist John Crump & Gun Owners of America have filed an FEC complaint against Facebook, AFP, and the Biden/Harris campaign. The Complaint alleges several violations of campaign finance law and foreign election interference.

Biden Harris censorship Facebook election interference iStock-klevo 1160557926.jpg
Biden Harris censorship Facebook election interference iStock-klevo 1160557926.jpg

U.S.A.-(AmmoLand.com)- John Crump, a regular journalist for AmmoLand News, and Gun Owners of America have filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) alleging violations of provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 by Facebook, the company.

The complaint alleges Facebook (FB), and/or Agence France-Presse (AFP), and Kamala Harris, the candidate for Vice President on the 2020 Democratic ticket, have violated the Federal Election Campaign Act act in the following ways. From the complaint:

1. the prohibition on corporations making in-kind contributions (see 52 U.S.C. §§ 30101(8), 30118);

2. the limitations on making coordinated expenditures (52 U.S.C. § 30116(a)(7));

3. the prohibition on making Independent Expenditures without disclaimers and reporting (52 U.S.C. §§ 30104(g) and 30120(a)); and

4. the prohibition on foreign nationals making in-kind contributions for the purpose of influencing a federal election (52 U.S.C. § 30121).

The hostility of Facebook against gun ownership, the right to arms, conservative speech, as well as Republicans, has become a notoriously subjective experience for many Second Amendment supporters.

The allegations in the FEC complaint are stark and easily followed. Facebook approves of AFP as its official “fact-checker”, which gives the French government supported agency significant power in deciding what is acceptable speech on Facebook for U.S.-based users, particularly as it concerns what is or is not “Fake News“.

The “fact-checker” is supposed to be unbiased in what it labels as false or true.

False Information Flagging Cam Edwards Kamala Harris Says She Supports Your Second Amendment Rights. Her Record Proves Otherwise FB August 2020
False Information Flagging of Cam Edwards “Kamala Harris Says She Supports Your Second Amendment Rights. Her Record Proves Otherwise” FB Screenshot August 2020.

The complaint lays out how an article written by Cam Edwards titled “Kamala Harris Says She Supports Your Second Amendment Rights, Her Record Proves Otherwise” on the website BearingArms.com, was taken down [technicaly redirected by overlay] by Facebook.

The FB app would overlay a bold-warning claiming the original article was “False Information” and hijacked interested readers, redirecting these FB users to an AFP article, Kamala Harris does not oppose gun ownership or the Second Amendment. Facebook searches for the Edwards article were directed to the AFP puff-piece driving Facebook users to the Fench article filled with less-than-truthful reporting failing to mention her history of supporting gun control and taking away your Second Amendment rights.

AmmoLand News and John Crump reported on this when first discovered on August 21, 2020, in an article on AmmoLand News titled ‘Facebook Fact Checker Interfering in U.S. Election, Covering for Harris’s Gun Control‘.

Another blatant example of the false “False Information” flagging was when an article by Texas Director for GOA, Rachel Malone was shadow-blocked.  The article is entitled “Kamala Harris is the Gun Owner’s Worst Nightmare“. Multiple screengrabs, where Facebook took down other articles about Candidate Kamala Harris’s position on a private right to arms, were easily found all over FB, see the selection below.

In the filed FEC complaint, “John Crump and Gun Owners of America, Inc. Federal Election Commission Complaint Against: Facebook, AFP Fact Check, and Kamala Harris for Vice President“, goes on to detail how Facebook then deleted the personal FB account of AmmoLand News contributor John Crump. After John attempted to post on the Facebook App a link to the original Kamila Harris court document or Amicus Brief referenced in the Cam Edwards article. That court-filed document, submitted by Kamila Harris in her own words, was once more falsely flagged with the warning. When John called attention to this practice directly with FaceBook his account was shortly thereafter deleted.

What Agence France-Presse (AFP) Convienenty Fails to Report

The AFP paper does not show official statements from the Harris campaign which deny or reject the positions in the 2008 amicus brief. Instead, AFP interprets the statements as though banning some guns and some gun ownership is not an attack on the right to own guns, but only “gun safety” measures.

The AFP paper takes the same political position as the Harris position, which is, essentially, the Second Amendment is or should be, a paper tiger. They cite the Harris statement in 2018:

At a Judiciary Committee hearing in March 2018, Harris called for “common sense gun safety laws” and said “it’s a false choice to suggest that you are either in favor of the Second Amendment or you want to take everyone’s guns away.”

Thus, AFP comes down on Harris’ side of a contentious Constitutional issue, which has legal scholars on both sides. AFP only cited experts who hold that Second Amendment rights are extremely limited.  AFP did not cite those who hold Second Amendment rights to be broad, such as Eugene Volokh from UCLA, or David Kopel of the Cato Institute.

This illustrates part of the problem with “fact-checkers” on political questions.

Either side can find “experts” to agree with its own beliefs.

When a public forum takes down assertions from one side, and only allows publication from the opposite side of an issue, that publication has taken sides.

The controversy goes deeper than the opinion of experts on the legal issue. It becomes one of a world-view or a philosophy.

The articles about Harris’ statements on more regulation of firearms in the United States cite her positions, and what the writers believe those positions mean for how Kamala Harris will act if she is elected the next Democratic Vice President, one 77-year-old heart-beat-away from being the President of the United States. They are clear and reasonable interpretations.

The AFP paper does not refute the claims of Cam Edwards, Rachel Malone, or John Crump. Instead, they interpret Harris’ statements and positions from the same philosophical base as the Harris campaign.  Facebook’s claims and actions are not transparent or easily followed.

The AFP paper never claims Harris approves of a right to own guns, which is what is required to refute the claims of Edwards and Malone.

Instead, it says Harris does not oppose all gun ownership. The two positions are far apart.  AFP never mentions the difference.

Facebook and AFP claim they do not take sides. GOA, John Crump, and the complaint say they do, and are doing so in violation of federal election law.

It is a David v. Goliath effort. Facebook is one of the wealthiest and most powerful companies on earth.

With only a few weeks before election day 2020 and early voting already in effect in some states,  Facebook and AFP are exerting their influence on the American presidential election let us hope the FEC will hold them accountable.

John Crump & GOA File Complaint With Federal Election Commission Against Facebook for Election Interference

Update: In an ironic twist of timing, the Biden / Harris Ticket in an open letter to Facebook on Monday is calling for increased, not less, censorship by Facebook.

Biden-Harris campaign demands increased censorship by Facebook before 2020 election Screengrab wsw.org
Biden-Harris campaign demands increased censorship by Facebook before the 2020 election Screengrab wsw.org

The World Socialist Web Site, big supporters of the Biden Ticket report: “The campaign of Democratic Party presidential and vice-presidential candidates Joseph Biden and Kamala Harris published an open letter on Monday demanding that Facebook increase political censorship on its platform before the general election on November 3.”

About Dean Weingarten:

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of Constitutional Carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering and retired from the Department of Defense after a 30-year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

Dean Weingarten

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Green Mtn. Boy

Farce Book should lose their right to publish over this crap,Shut Them Down as they have proven they can’t be trusted .

Ansel Hazen

Excellent article Dean. I wish this issue would become a hot button for Trump.


Fakebook has ALREADY proven they are PUBLISHERS. Thus, they should face FINANCIAL PENALTIES and RICO related charges when they act as PRAPAGANDISTS for the DemoKKKrat National Communist party CABAL!!!


I even got censored a week or so back for copying over a progun article onto a Facebook comment. Really ticked me off.


Biden and Harris are low order scum! Lower than wha5s one the bottom of Lake Okeechobee!

Divino Vocamen

Nothing on the “media ” about this .


The future belongs to freedom. If it takes the militia to get that freedom there are Americans who will turn One Hacker Place into the new Lexington Common.


anyone with a single functioning brain cell is able to determine that big tech is biased against conservatives and conservative values, i.e. American values. as much as i hate government control, big government need to force big tech to establish once and for all if they are a platform or publisher, they cannot be both and hold them accountable for that determination. they claim whichever suits their needs on a case by case basis. i personally have been banned from twitter once for violating their community standards, called islam a barbaric murderous death cult. i filed an appeal and never… Read more »


Politicians just don’t lie for a living, they have everyone in their corner lie as well. Even after they are caught and exposed, they still lie. Final analogy, they can never be trusted.