Gallup: Gun Control Unpopular and Not a Priority for Americans

Just The Facts NRA
The latest Gallup poll shows that gun control is becoming increasingly unpopular. IMG NRA-ILA

U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- The latest results of Gallup’s long-running gun issue polling are sure to upset gun control advocates. After a year of COVID uncertainty, civil unrest, and record gun sales, support for further firearms restrictions has reached its lowest point since 2016. Moreover, the data shows that exceedingly few Americans consider additional gun controls the most pressing issue facing the country. As Gallup was one of the few polling firms that did not disgrace itself during the 2020 elections, anti-gun activists should find the results all the more stinging.

Since 1990, Gallup has periodically asked Americans “In general, do you feel that the laws covering the sale of firearms should be made more strict, less strict, or kept as they are?” In early October a slim majority of 57 percent answered that gun controls should be “more strict,” down from 67 percent in 2018. Those hoping that gun control laws would be “kept as they are” or are made “less strict” accounted for 34 and 9 percent, respectively.

Gallup’s data makes short work of some of the more ludicrous claims peddled by gun control advocates and opportunistic political grifters. For almost a decade, dishonest gun control supporters have contended that there is near-universal support for the criminalization of private firearm transfers – sometimes referred to as “universal background checks.” Gallup’s results directly controvert these specious claims; as do the results from every time this gun control measure has been placed on the ballot.

While it is unfortunate that a narrow majority of those polled support stricter gun control measures, the results must be placed in context. Through the 1990s and into the early 2000s, the measured support for stricter gun control routinely topped 60 percent and was sometimes measured above 70 percent.

Moreover, support for stricter gun control has dropped across the political spectrum. Gun control is less popular among Republicans, Democrats, and independents than when Gallup measured the issue in 2018 and 2019.

The most notable long-term trend highlighted in Gallup’s findings is the public’s continued rejection of a ban on handguns. Gallup reported, “Americans’ support for a ban on the possession of handguns, at 25%, is near the lowest on record in Gallup’s 40-year trend.” Longtime gun rights supporters will recall that a ban on the civilian possession of handguns was the organizing mission of gun control groups like Brady (formerly Handgun Control, Inc. and the National Council to Control Handguns), Coalition to Stop Gun Violence (formerly National Coalition to Ban Handguns), and the Violence Policy Center. By every available metric, these groups are much further from their goal than when they started.

In addition to their occasional gun control-specific polling, each month Gallup asks Americans “What do you think is the most important problem facing the country today?” In October, less than 0.5 percent of respondents cited “Guns/Gun control.” Further, the number of responses for “Guns/Gun control” has been similarly negligible for each month since March.

Beyond polling, the 2020 election season provided hints that gun control was unpopular and that anti-gun politicians knew it.

Rather than level with the American people about their support for radical gun controls, Billionaire Michael Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety sent mailers to swing districts in Arizona, Iowa, Minnesota, and North Carolina that challenged candidates’ supposed positions on health care and pharmaceuticals. In Texas, Everytown targeted at least one candidate on the topic of public school funding.

In Georgia, Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Jon Ossoff put out a misleading ad claiming he would “defend our Second Amendment.” The ad was a poor attempt to hide the candidate’s anti-gun record, which includes advocating for a ban on commonly-owned Second Amendment-protected semiautomatic firearms like the AR-15.

In Montana, a wealthy Californian and other out-of-state interests bankrolled a fake hunting group called the Montana Hunters & Anglers Leadership Fund in a failed attempt to cover up current governor and U.S. Senate candidate Steve Bullock’s anti-gun record.

Given the current mood of the country and the flood of new gun owners it has helped bring about, anti-gun politicians would do well to extend their avoidance of gun control from election season into their respective legislative sessions.


About NRA-ILA:

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess, and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit: www.nra.org

National Rifle Association Institute For Legislative Action (NRA-ILA)

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RoyD
RoyD
2 months ago

The article title is most likely true but then the “public” is constantly bombarded by propaganda designed to subtly influence them to think negatively about firearms. Here is an example of such from Newsweek:

Arkansas Home Shot At After Father Threw Out Boys Hiding In Daughter’s Bedroom (newsweek.com)

RoyD
RoyD
2 months ago
Reply to  RoyD

Here is another example of the propaganda:

Portsmouth interim police chief, City Council discuss gun violence, officer shortage in the city | WAVY.com

They have a problem but it isn’t guns.

Portsmouth DemographicsAccording to the most recent ACS, the racial composition of Portsmouth was:

  • Black or African American: 52.66%
  • White: 40.16%
  • Two or more races: 3.78%
  • Other race: 1.46%
  • Asian: 1.31%
  • Native American: 0.49%
  • Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander: 0.14%
james
james
2 months ago

Popular or not, they will shove this down our throats.

Stag
Stag
2 months ago

I find it ironic that the NRA-ILA writes articles like this after they’ve actively advocated for and supported gun control.

RoyD
RoyD
2 months ago
Reply to  Stag

It has been all about the Benjamins for a long time. I remember about thirty years ago Wayne Lapierre appeared on a talk radio program here in OKC on KTOK. The program was hosted by Carol Arnold who was not a “gun friendly” person. He was doing a poor job by being too nice and beating around the bush. I called up and hit Carol with several “meaty” questions and comments. She ended up stuttering it shook her up so badly. My call made such an impression that they used it in promos for a while. My association with the… Read more »

JSNMGC
JSNMGC
2 months ago
Reply to  Stag

The NRA loves it when anti-2nd Amendment politicians gain more power. They have more opportunities to scream “we have to do something – send us money.”

I had to explain to someone recently how a candidate could have an “A” rating from the NRA and yet be an advocate of Red Flag laws. When I told the person the reason for this is that the NRA advocates for Red Flag laws, the person just had a blank look on their face – “wut?”

nrringlee
nrringlee
2 months ago

The forces opposed to your liberty sail under false flags, make false promises and buy puppets like Mark Kelly for their personal use. Unfortunately there exists a class of usurpers and opportunists who will stoop to any level of nefarious activity and will subvert the liberty of the many for a dollar and the adulation of tyrants. Kelly is one such example, Master Beto ORoarke another and Ossoff another. These clowns are for sale and go to the highest bidder. They hide behind smoke and mirrors and spew “Hope-a-Dope” rather than address specific solutions to specific problems. Far too many… Read more »