Oregon Legislature Passes ‘Safe Storage’ Bill; Gun Group Declares ‘Sell-Out’

Oregon Legislature Passes ‘Safe Storage’ Bill; Gun Group Declares ‘Sell-Out’
Oregon Legislature Passes ‘Safe Storage’ Bill; Gun Group Declares ‘Sell-Out’

U.S.A.-(AmmoLand.com)- Lawmakers in Salem, Oregon have passed the first gun control bill in a long time, and the Oregon Firearms Federation is declaring in a message that six Republican state senators, led by Senate Minority Leader Fred Girod have engaged in a “sell out.”

Yet all six voted “no” on the bill. They were joined by Democrat Sen. Betsy Johnson from Scappoose. A full voting history of the bill can be read here.

Senate Bill 554 is a so-called “safe storage” measure stretching 12 pages, and it includes a prohibition on firearms in the Capitol and “large airport terminals” and allows school districts, community colleges and universities to “set their own rules outlawing guns on their grounds,” OPB reported.

The bill mandates that the owner or “possessor” of a firearm “shall, at all times that the firearm is not carried by or under the control of the owner, possessor or authorized person, secure the firearm: (A) With an engaged trigger or cable lock; (B) In a locked container; or (C) In a gun room.”

According to Oregon Public Broadcasting, if Democrat Gov. Kate Brown signs the legislation, which seems likely, the Beaver State “will join 11 other states with laws requiring locking devices on stored firearms.”

One Oregon gun owner who requested anonymity told AmmoLand News via telephone that passage of the bill was “the stupidest thing you can possibly do.”

“This penalizes honest gun owners,” he said. “Any school or college can become a ‘gun free zone,’ and everyone knows most mass shootings take place in gun free zones.”

He said if the bill becomes law, it will not prevent crime. He also wondered how the safe storage law would be enforced.

“Are they going to come take a look at my guns,” he asked

The measure, OPB said, “opens up gun owners to civil litigation if their unsecured weapon is used to inflict injury.” The bill has teeth, as noted by the Portland Oregonian. Failure to secure a gun could bring a fine of $500, and if a minor is able to access the gun, the fine is $2,000.

Gun owners also need to report lost or stolen firearms to the police within 72 hours.

This provision stems from the theft of an AR-15 rifle by the killer who used it to open fire at the Clackamas Town Center in 2012, killing Cindy Ann Yuille and Steven Forsyth. It is stated in the preamble of the legislation. The shooter subsequently killed himself.

Almost predictably, Democrat Sen. Floyd Prozanski from Eugene told the Oregonian, “The vast majority of gun owners in this state are not going to be directly impacted by this.”

Not so, argues Sen. Tim Knopp, a Bend Republican.

“It clearly infringes on the right to people’s self-defense,” Knopp told the Oregonian.

Oregon gun rights activists aren’t furious only at majority Democrats. A recall effort has reportedly been launched against Sen. Girod (R-Lyons).

In a statement, OFF declared, “The damage Girod has done to Oregonians and his own caucus is incalculable.”

As described by the OPB report, “Girod and five of his Republican colleagues committed an act that some in their party felt was a betrayal: They showed up for work.”

AmmoLand reached out to OFF for comment, but the group has so far not responded.

In the past, Republicans have managed to derail gun control efforts by simply walking out, thus denying Democrats a quorum so no votes could be taken. But with the six Republicans in Senate chambers, the threshold was met. But according to the OPB report, Girod and his colleagues “chose to stay to oppose the bill, granting Democrats the quorum needed to hold a vote and pass the measure.”

There is definitely backlash, according to the OBP report, apparently toward both sides.

“State Sen. Bill Hansell, R-Athena, and other Senate Republicans say they have received death threats for granting Democrats a quorum in March,” the story reported.

And Girod is quoted in the article saying the Firearms Federation is “not welcome in my office.”

Gun control groups are reportedly happy with passage of SB 554. The Oregonian quoted Henry Wessinger, president of a group called State of Safety Action. He told the newspaper “Safe storage saves lives.” He said the measure will make it more difficult for school shooters to get firearms, and make gun owners more responsible.

Buried in the bill is a requirement for firearms dealers.

“A gun dealer shall post in a prominent location in the gun dealer’s place of business a notice, in block letters not less than one inch in height, that states, ‘The purchaser of a firearm has an obligation to store firearms in a safe manner and to prevent unsupervised access to a firearm by a minor. If a minor or unauthorized person obtains access to a firearm and the owner failed to store the firearm in a safe manner, the owner may be in violation of the law.’”

How this will ultimately play out is speculation. If Gov. Brown does sign the legislation, it will take effect 91 days after the regular session of the Legislature adjourns.


About Dave Workman

Dave Workman is a senior editor at TheGunMag.com and Liberty Park Press, author of multiple books on the Right to Keep & Bear Arms, and formerly an NRA-certified firearms instructor.

Dave Workman

Subscribe
Notify of
27 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cam
Cam
1 month ago

So you should always store a cut cable lock right where you keep your gun. Just saying

Last edited 1 month ago by Cam
Patriot Solutions
Patriot Solutions
1 month ago
Reply to  Cam

Next to the zero capacity magazine but really in the real world I simply don’t care what they say.

TEEBONE
TEEBONE
1 month ago

“Held:

“3) …the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional.” – D.C. v. Heller (2008)

Dicta:

“[A] statute which, under the pretense of regulating, amounts to a destruction of the right, or which requires arms to be so borne as to render them wholly useless for the purpose of defense [is] clearly unconstitutional.”

Last edited 1 month ago by TEEBONE
musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 month ago
Reply to  TEEBONE

TEEBONE, they don’t care what the federal laws or constitution says. Look at how they promote violence in the streets of portlandia on a daily basis. Harboring fugitives is against the law and we are a sanctuary state proclaimed by our bisexual governor that nurtures illegals and antifags. We are the first state in all of the country to allow illegal drugs to be legal so long as you only have enough for personal consumption in possession. Oregone isn’t going to hell, we already made it and now they are wanting to drive the final spikes to make it possible… Read more »

Stone
Stone
1 month ago

This is really cool. From what I read: “Failure to secure a gun could bring a fine of $500, and if a minor is able to access the gun, the fine is $2,000.” So if a dirtbag breaks into your home and manages to steal a firearm, no matter how you had it stored, it obviously wasn’t good enough and you can be fined $500, but if that dirtbag is a minor, it’s $2000. The only good news if that dirtbag manages to kill you before you could access the safe or take off the cable lock, and load the… Read more »

TEEBONE
TEEBONE
1 month ago
Reply to  Stone

It makes no difference. Heller has already held that so-called “safe-storage” laws are unconstitutional.

musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 month ago

I think this part of the article is misleading according to what I understand. The measure, OPB said, “opens up gun owners to civil litigation if their unsecured weapon is used to inflict injury.” The bill has teeth, as noted by the Portland Oregonian. Failure to secure a gun could bring a fine of $500, and if a minor is able to access the gun, the fine is $2,000. That reads true but what it doesn’t say that I think the bill actually says is that if someone breaks into your safe and steals your gun with a lock on it,… Read more »

Superman
Superman
1 month ago
Reply to  musicman44mag

20 ‘minuets’ away? That is a LOT of dancing!

Henry Bowman
Henry Bowman
1 month ago

The problem with the GOP is their willingness to tolerate RINOs in their midst. This puts them at odds with the vast majority of conservatives who prefer their liberties infringement-free. The GOP needs to purge its ranks of RINOs if they expect to survive past the next election cycle.

musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 month ago
Reply to  Henry Bowman

The problem is they lie and say the are for the 2nd amendment, take gun organizations donations and then turn their back on the people that supported them and when you find out, it’s too late.

Dr. Strangelove
Dr. Strangelove
1 month ago

I would report a lost or especially stole firearm immediately, I don’t need overlords to tell me that.

musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 month ago

Ya it will be the law but when you are on vacation and across country and the neighbor calls and tells you, you call the police to make a report and they require that you be there in order to take a police report thereby making you a law breaker. That happened to me with the kommie ran state of kommiefornia while I was moving into my new house in Oregone.

Finnky
Finnky
1 month ago

Problem with these laws is that you are liable for crimes committed with your gun, despite having secured it and reporting the theft.

If you have an untraceable firearm are you going to report it stolen in hope it will be returned or will you retain anonymity in case it is ever used in a crime?

Potential liability in reporting is huge. Likelihood your gun is ever recovered and returned to you is minuscule. To me the risk to reward is quite clear.

musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 month ago
Reply to  Finnky

To me it is a sign that if the rest of the United States follows suit there will be a lot of legal citizens running around with serial numbers ground out and not care if they become felons over it. Remember, it’s easier to get a gun than vote so we shouldn’t have any problem getting another one and guess what we will be saving the fees they charge to obtain and register the gun when we buy it which would be another incentive to be a felon. There are to many people that will not comply I am sure.… Read more »

Last edited 1 month ago by musicman44mag
TStheDeplorable
TStheDeplorable
1 month ago

I’m moving from Oregon. This is the last straw.

Dr. Strangelove
Dr. Strangelove
1 month ago

I don’t blame you. I got out of the People’s Republik of Illinois 8 years ago and couldn’t be happier.

musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 month ago

But where did you go? Do you have kommie dictators running your state?

musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 month ago
Reply to  musicman44mag

Booo, Hissss. It will never happen because that would require that either all good patriots give up or die. We are stronger and outnumber them by so many there is no way that they could win. So keep dreaming because that is the best you will ever get.

musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 month ago
Reply to  musicman44mag

Well thank your up vote . We can upvote them together when the time comes, and we can take the same path together to victory when the time comes, how about that.

Gdubb
Gdubb
1 month ago

It’s only going to get worse from here. The runaway dim train cannot be stopped in OR. Way too many idiot voters in Portland. Best bet is move to a free state to ensure it isn’t also destroyed by a dim majority down the road.

musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 month ago
Reply to  Gdubb

and which state do you recommend?
I laugh. The people of the country are concerned that kommiefornia is loosing it’s people and they are moving to multiple states and are going to screw up there’s next. That might happen after they breed for awhile but if they are breaking up and moving to multiple states then they are loosing their strength in numbers ability and spreading their sickness thin. Just need to keep them out of the local and state politics. That is a key factor because that is how they start.

musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 month ago

Amen, but where to go. Arizona or Montana that has laws that says they will not recognize or enforce the new joe kamalatoe obiden anti 2nd amendment laws? South Dakota is the state with the most republicans. Sturgis looks nice. All the bikers and you know they have guns and are not going to turn them in.

Scotty Gunn
Scotty Gunn
1 month ago

If I lived there, I guess every room would be a “gun room”

musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 month ago
Reply to  Scotty Gunn

Lol. and does your definition of a gun room meet their requirements?

musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 month ago
Reply to  musicman44mag

Right on. I think we will be seeing a lot more of those.

ras52
ras52
1 month ago
Reply to  musicman44mag

Will, same here!

ras52
ras52
1 month ago
Reply to  ras52

Will, I’m fine thanks, hope you and yours are too! I have not posted much lately but try to read here as much as possible.Hope all is well in Texas!