Obsessed Shrinks Show Insanity of Trusting Haters with a Say on Gun Disabilities

Mental Health
It sounds like the crazy ones who need to be locked up are the racist, anti-gun “mental health professionals.”

U.S.A. – -(Ammoland.com)- “Whiteness is a condition one first acquires and then one has—a malignant, parasitic-like condition to which ‘white” people have a particular susceptibility,” the abstract for “On Having Whiteness” in The Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association asserts. “Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse. These deformed appetites particularly target nonwhite peoples.

“There is not yet a permanent cure,” we are told.

Possibly there is if one is to heed the prescription offered by Dr. Aruna Khilanani, a Manhattan psychiatrist and psychoanalyst who offered her “final solution” to medical students and faculty at Yale School of Medicine’s Child Study Center. While lecturing on the “Psychopathic Problem of the White Mind,” she “told the audience that she had fantasized about ‘unloading a revolver into the head of any white person’ who got in her way,” the Daily Mail reported.

These aren’t just isolated nutjobs. These are voices that influence their professions. Their opinions, in turn, are used to shape public opinion and craft laws, including citizen disarmament edicts enacted under the pretext of “mental health.”

There’s a reason why they call us “gun nuts.”

That’s why “helpful” Republicans who enjoy a reputation of being “pro-gun” are not doing the people who elected them any favors by advancing “bipartisan” legislation.

Backers of such bills tell us “due process” protections will be ensured by seeing individuals get their day in court. It would help if we knew what protections equivalent to those provided in a jury trial that will provide. Specifically, will decisions rely on those who may have biases of their own, as can currently be the case, with ATF’s “clarifying the term ‘adjudicated as a mental defective’ to mean a determination by a court, board, commission or other lawful authority,” and with some states applying even broader “standards”?

What objective protections will exist to offset politically connected anti-gun judges, politically-appointed boards, and “expert” adherents of the American Psychiatric Association’s “Position Statement on Firearm Access, Acts of Violence and the Relationship to Mental Illness and Mental Health Services.” It’s fair to ask because APA included in its advocacy platform such diktats as registration-enabling background checks, “smart” guns, storage mandates, “gun-free” zones, doctor-patient boundary violations, and tax-funded anti-gun “studies,” all outside the scope of the training and credentialing of those making these proposals.

Of special interest – or it should be: How will rights be restored when there is no longer a compelling mental health prescription to deny them (assuming that’s even obtainable)?

What universal appeal mechanism – affordable to all, not just to elites for whom money is no object – will exist to declare a person is once more “eligible” to keep and bear arms? What guarantees are there that the same biases that colored the disability ruling in the first place won’t reassert themselves in the “parole” process? And have we identified psychiatric evaluators, risk management administrators, and insurers who will be willing to subject themselves to malpractice liabilities should a person deemed “fit” be misdiagnosed? Or will the pressure from all considerations be to “err on the side of caution”?

The simple truth of the matter is that anyone who can’t be trusted with a gun can’t be trusted without a custodian, and that must require full due process before being imposed. Leaving someone who has been adjudicated a danger to himself or others with uncontrolled access to people and things will only produce disaster. As the quote (popularly but incorrectly attributed to Einstein) goes, doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.

Racist shrinks who view human beings they hate as malignant parasites who deserve to be shot in the head are more than crazy, they’re evil. Trusting anti-gun associations that promote such monstrous ideas with a say in anyone’s rights is beyond nuts, it’s suicidal.


About David Codrea:

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating/defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” is a regularly featured contributor to Firearms News, and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

David Codrea

Subscribe
Notify of
27 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
swmft
swmft
14 minutes ago

the hate she has for others that a different makes me wonder if the genetic hate like Hatfield and McCoy feud is from the African branch of homo sapien line , https://reliefweb.int/report/world/conflict-still-africa-s-biggest-challenge-2020 tribal wars never end would suggest defect in dna

The other Jim
The other Jim
1 day ago

This is dangerous and must be stopped: “with ATF’s “clarifying the term ‘adjudicated as a mental defective’ to mean a determination by a court, board, commission or other lawful authority,” “….. she, Dr. Aruna Khilanani is the “other lawful authority” as she has “MD” after her name; she, Dr. Aruna Khilanani can be part of a “board” or even the sole member of the board depending on who has the say over the “board”; she, Dr. Aruna Khilanani can be a “commission” assigned by her democrat/socialist anti-constitution American-Way-of-Life destroyers. This has to stop otherwise within one generation non of us will… Read more »

HLB
HLB
1 day ago
Reply to  The other Jim

The implication of the “will be allowed to own a gun” statement is false. You can not allow or disallow such a thing. You can only physically take the gun away from somebody. That somebody is the one who will allow or disallow such action.

HLB

gregs
gregs
1 day ago

i agree on the evil part, especially ones that would like to prevent others from defending themselves from harm or evil. i like to frame the argument in the context of you don’t have the moral right to decide if, when, where and how i defend myself.

hippybiker
hippybiker
1 day ago

I saw this ignorant foreign twit on FB. She needs to have hers Ass kicked back to whatever Shit Hole spawned her!

JoeUSooner
JoeUSooner
1 day ago

“Whiteness”???? These cuckoo clocks are full of manure.

Why on earth would ANY sane human being give any credibility or credence to these mentally ill asses? (That’s a correct description – see the DemocRat Party icon!) When the hell were these social-justice leaders mistaken for persons of actual importance? Who decided that these psychotic menials had to be listened to?

These wastes-of-human-skin have only the power/sway that we allow. So, as we used to say in VietNam, “fornicate ’em and feed ’em fish!” (that’s the sanitized version). Do I need to express myself in a clearer manner?

Last edited 1 day ago by JoeUSooner
musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 day ago
Reply to  JoeUSooner

Hell no. I will say something that is considered racist today even though I have white neesed black people saying it. Call a spade a spade.

StillWolfe
StillWolfe
1 day ago

So help me out, David. I haven’t heard anything about anyone reporting to the Local, State or Federal agencies who are always admonishing us that, “if we see something, say something.” Here we have a person of apparently middle-eastern heritage (given the spelling of her name) who is proclaiming her thoughts of killing American(s) of a certain race and making this claim in public and on our soil. Have the police or FBI done a Red Flag visit to her home to confiscate her weapons? Are they investigating these as threats of a racial hate crime? Is she being investigated… Read more »

musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 day ago
Reply to  StillWolfe

Right on, you called it right. Just like my question, how can Omar rein when she is obviously a Muslim first and not even an American. How about marrying her brother?
Laws, rules and regulation for thee not for me.

Dam’n good point.

PMinFl
PMinFl
1 day ago
Reply to  musicman44mag

Air drop her back in Somalia with just her rag on her head (my bad).

Last edited 1 day ago by PMinFl
musicman44mag
musicman44mag
1 day ago
Reply to  PMinFl

Just the thought of that thing with no clothes on makes me want to puke.

Finnky
Finnky
1 day ago
Reply to  musicman44mag

I read it as having a rag rather than a parachute when pushed out a door at 20k feet. She’s welcome to have all her clothes – no need to hurt your brain picturing her naked.

PMinFl
PMinFl
19 hours ago
Reply to  Finnky

correct

nrringlee
nrringlee
2 days ago

Social Darwinism viewed in a mirror. Remember, Darwin’s work was originally entitled “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life),” published on 24 November 1859, and was a tome justifying racism. It is the foundation of modern Progressive thought. Lack of critical thinking skills ever present in the Progressive mind lead progressives and leftists to fall in to the trap time and again. They repeatedly fall in to the inverse definition trap: good is bad; freedom is slavery; black is good; black is bad; white is good;… Read more »

swmft
swmft
2 days ago

HOMICIDAL they want to kill anyone who does not look and think like them. Tribal warfare in Africa, still going on to this day Dr. Aruna Khilanani would do good to study this behavior, which for the most part does not exist in the rest of the world, china the exception,trying to get rid of all but han peoples so if there is a defect it is in the homo sapiens line ,those with Neanderthal and cro magnon blood seem to be more stable

Knute
Knute
2 days ago
Reply to  swmft

Tribalism is back now, even in North America, and particularly in Europe. It is showing up as race against race, but racism IS tribalism.
“My tribe is better than your tribe… so we get to destroy the others”, is the exact same attitude as: “My skin color is better than yours…. therefore we get to destroy the other colors”. Only the way of determining one’s tribe differs. The attitude is identical.

PMinFl
PMinFl
1 day ago
Reply to  Knute

We (Americans) weren’t like this before Obama.

DDS
DDS
2 days ago

They’re convinced that a good portion of the so called “white race” are borderline if not fully developed psychopaths, yet claim their diagnostic abilities are not advanced enough to enter peoples’ names into NICS.

Strange!

The phrase “takes one to call one” comes to mind.

JPM
JPM
2 days ago

Too many of these so-called mental health professionals are in more need of treatment than their patients, and most cannot spell, “Ethical”, much less know what it means or if they do, just don’t care. The requirements in most states to obtain a professional license to practice some form of emotional/mental therapy, such as counselling, is about as difficult as obtaining a drivers license. Even those with medical degrees or advanced degrees cannot agree on even the basic type of treatment for minor neuroses, much less more complex disorders, and clinical psychologists are even less capable. In this case, we… Read more »

PMinFl
PMinFl
1 day ago
Reply to  JPM

On day one of almost any Psych 1 class the professor states that most are attending because they are trying to figure out what’s wrong with themselves.

Last edited 1 day ago by PMinFl
swmft
swmft
2 hours ago
Reply to  JPM

no you need to show some ability to get drivers license

Hazcat
Hazcat
2 days ago

This is why they (gun grabbers) want to declare ‘gun violence’ a national health issue. Just imagine the emergency powers that will be made from thin air, a proven docile populace that will follow unconstitutional ‘health orders’ being backed up by ‘doctors’ like the one above. Oh, and with ERPO (red flag) laws that will mandate mental health checks and there is the next front in the attack on our rights.

Finnky
Finnky
2 days ago

Nice use of “final solution”. There is validity in claiming Dr Aruna Khilanani is in fact at the same level of evilness as Hitler.

Can you imagine the response if a white person said something similar – or even that they fantasized of harming a specific person of color?

Mack
Mack
2 days ago

This is an important read. I’m glad you wrote this.

But remember, as I have stated before, this is much more a Disabilities Rights issue than a KBA issue.

The ADA Title II would certainly help here at the state level.

Larry
Larry
2 days ago
Reply to  Mack

Elaborate?

Mack
Mack
1 day ago
Reply to  Larry
Mack
Mack
1 day ago
Reply to  Larry