NSSF to Challenge New York Public Nuisance Lawsuit Law

New York Gun Flag iStock-884181314
New York is an anti-gun dystopia. IMG iStock-884181314

U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) will challenge to overturn the law signed by New York Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo that would allow civil lawsuits by municipalities against the firearm industry for the criminal actions by non-associated third parties.

The law is in contravention to federal law, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), and the legal foundations of tort law.

“This law is unconstitutional, plain and simple. It is abhorrent that Governor Cuomo is rehashing a decades-old failed playbook that was rejected by courts in the 1990s and early 2000s,” said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President, and General Counsel. “Governor Cuomo is, again, blameshifting for his administration’s failures to prevent crime by pointing fingers at firearm manufacturers that have been working with federal, state, and local authorities for real solutions. This law is based on the same legal understanding that would allow victims of drunk drivers to sue Ford and Budweiser for the criminal actions of an individual. This law is not legal accountability. It is political posturing.”

Gov. Cuomo signed the law after repeating the same debunked talking points churned out by President Joe Biden. Gov. Cuomo claimed the firearm industry is the only industry immune to lawsuits. That worn-out myth was discredited by The Washington Post and Fact Check.orgPolitifact called them “False” in 2015 when failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton attempted to pass along the debunked information.

Gov. Cuomo knows this history and the record of courts dismissing these lawsuits before PLCAA passed with by a broad bipartisan consensus in 2005. Gov. Cuomo, when serving as President Bill Clinton’s Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, got involved when he organized dozens of local housing authorities to bring their own lawsuits against gunmakers and threatened the industry with “death by a thousand cuts.”

This was his admission these lawsuits lacked a legal foundation and amounted to harassment through litigation.

Legal Professor Victor Schwartz, who literally wrote the textbook on tort law, former law professor and law school dean and the current co-chairman of the Public Policy Group of the law firm Shook, Hardy & Bacon, recently authored an op-ed setting the record straight on PLCAA. He wrote, “The PLCAA remains a commonsense law that protects against unsound attempts to change radically a fundamental liability law principle.”

Jonathan Turley, the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University, wrote in The Hill of the PLCAA, “The bill saved the industry some litigation costs, but the industry would have prevailed in such actions anyway if they were tried. Product liability and tort actions against manufacturers have uniformly and correctly been rejected by the courts.”

To learn more about the history of PLCAA, what the law does and doesn’t do, and other industries with similar protections, read NSSF’s Primer on Repealing PLCAA.


About The National Shooting Sports Foundation

NSSF is the trade association for the firearm industry. Its mission is to promote, protect and preserve hunting and shooting sports. Formed in 1961, NSSF has a membership of thousands of manufacturers, distributors, firearm retailers, shooting ranges, sportsmen’s organizations, and publishers nationwide. For more information, visit nssf.org

National Shooting Sports Foundation

5 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
swmft

we need a federal law that people filing malicious lawsuits are responsible for all costs ,without protection of home or health. and state attorneys or others filing under guise of “public” good must pay from personal wealth ,not public funds

Wass

A wonderful idea. However, US legislatures and administrative authorities are larded down with lawyers. The system as it now stands, serves their interests to a tee,

The other Jim

Indeed Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President, and General Counsel. Good to here it.

JimmyS

The NSSF makes the same error in blaming Cuomo for crimes he didn’t commit that Cuomo makes in blaming gun makers for crimes they didn’t commit. Are we supposedly so dense that we are to believe that government prevents crime?

How about some logical consistency in principles? Or is that just too much to ask of the ideologically driven?

swmft

soliciting others to do a criminal act is in fact criminal. he did soliciting , so he is guilty of their actions semantics or not