WA Anti-Gunners Hit Ground Running with Hearings on 3 Bills, Others Pending

WA Appeals Court Unanimously Upholds Preemption in SAF Lawsuit, iStock-884168778
Washington anti-gunners have hit the ground running, with hearings already scheduled on three erosive gun control measures, iStock-884168778

Washington – -(Ammoland.com)- Evergreen State anti-gunners hit the ground running as the 2022 legislative session opened, scheduling three gun control bills for a hearing this past Wednesday morning Jan. 12, 2022. There is another measure held over from last year to repeal state preemption, thus returning to a system where local governments could establish their own, and often conflicting, gun laws.

There is also a pre-filed measure—Senate Bill 5721—that would place the Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)—now an independent agency—under control of the state Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Washington hunters and anglers are fired up about this proposal, which they believe will politicize fish and game management, marginalizing their interests.

Immediate attention is focused on three House Bills, according to the Washington 2022 Legislative Action Committee, which offers details on its Facebook page.

  • House Bill 1618 Would prohibit carrying weapons at election-related offices
  • House Bill 1630 Creates restrictions on the possession of weapons in certain locations
  • House Bill 1705 Is an act prohibiting so-called “ghost guns”

AmmoLand News spoke via telephone with Curtis Bingham, co-founder and vice president of the Washington Civil Rights Association, who is cautioning gun owners to “maintain their vigilance” on these gun control proposals and not become narrowly focused on proposed bans on so-called “assault weapons” and “high-capacity magazines.” Those issues are certainly important, but he said the three bills being heard today constitute a continued incremental attack on carry rights. Last year, he recalled, legislation was passed prohibiting the open carrying of firearms on the Capitol campus and at rallies in other locations. Two of the three new measures expand areas were carrying firearms would be prohibited, and the third constitutes an outright ban.

Bingham noted the proposed ban on “ghost guns”—firearms built by home gunsmiths—is a direct attack on what is an American tradition: building one’s own personal gun.

The Legislative Action group has some 9,700 members statewide, he said. They stay informed with daily postings on the group’s Facebook page, where activist Jordan Anthony cautioned:

“Our analysis is that limiting open carry and acting to regulate ‘ghost guns’ are top priorities for the legislature. There is also added pressure from our Attorney General’s office to ban standard capacity magazines. Regardless, the legislature is moving swiftly on firearms bills this year.”

In Washington, as just about anywhere else, many gun owners don’t pay as much attention to legislation that does not directly impact them, said one activist. For example, the bill to dramatically change fish and wildlife management by putting the WDFW under DNR control may not get the attention it deserves from gun owners who don’t hunt, but it should because of one important factor. Every gun owner in the state contributes to the federal Pittman-Robertson program, which gets revenue from special excise taxes on firearms and ammunition. Revenues from this program, which dates back to the late 1930s, are annually apportioned to state wildlife agencies to support wildlife conservation and management programs.

Translation: Every Washington gun owner has a stake in how the agency is managed. As noted by Liberty Park Press, many Evergreen State hunters “are also strong Second Amendment activists who realize the same people who want to marginalize hunters are traditionally also supportive of all manner of gun control.”

What is worrisome is that the bill spans 98 pages, so there is plenty of room for political hijinks hidden in the fine print.

Washington is one of the original preemption states, with a statute dating back to 1983 and 1985. It became a model for similar laws in other states and has also been used to prevent the City of Seattle from adopting a ban on firearms at city park facilities. Both Seattle and the City of Edmonds are now being sued by the Second Amendment Foundation and National Rifle Association for adopting so-called “safe storage” ordinances in direct violation of the state preemption law.

If House Bill 1313 is adopted, state gun law uniformity would vanish almost overnight, and the gun prohibition lobby knows it.

Historically, municipal governments despise preemption because it takes away their authority over gun owners and places management of firearms policy solely in the hands of the Legislature. Efforts to do away with preemption in Washington date back almost to the day the original legislation was signed into law.

Because the Legislature is holding something of a virtual session again this year, the hearings will be online to prevent citizens’ in-person participation.


About Dave Workman

Dave Workman is a senior editor at TheGunMag.com and Liberty Park Press, author of multiple books on the Right to Keep & Bear Arms, and formerly an NRA-certified firearms instructor.

Dave Workman

7 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
nrringlee

Excellent work Dave. Actually, this is pretty light duty for a legislative agenda. Most Western states get a mix of about fourteen boilerplate bills introduced in to committee each year. The bills are introduced with checks attached with strings from the Bloomburg astro turf gangs and are the same old magical thinking based wish list of the Progressive New Left. Warning to hunters in WA: Senate Bill 5721 is a Trojan Horse. Look to the example to your south, California to see how DNR bureaucracies will take your large game and upland/waterfowl management funds and redirect them to nongame, unscientific… Read more »

Last edited 2 years ago by nrringlee
Montana454Casull

They are reaping what they have sown in Washington . The west coast is lost to communists and they are moving inland to other states to infect the nation with thier toxic agendas . Stay out of Montana if you know what’s good for you as we will not bow to your bullshit here in BigSky country . The big bears need to be fed and you will be on thier menu here !

Tionico

who are the “they” who have sown, and are now reaping? I will state that the “they” who have crammed these offensive laws down our throats and continue to do so are not the same “they” as we who will and do suffer the consequences of those laws being enacted. Most of the “they” responsible for the past decade’s outrageous gun laws are the uber wealthy who seem to think they and their ilk are the only ones who should be allowed to have their lives and places protected by the strength of arms. That means we the little people… Read more »

Tionico

Wake up OreGONE. We have had mail in only balllots for decades hwere. What DOES need to happen though is a through vetting of those now registered to vote. Each countey’s Clerk MUST take action but hardly any ever do. I remember when we got a GOOD CLerk in my conuty. She had the voter rolls checked….. thousands of voters were purged because of deaths, moved and still registered at former address, fifty people at the same address, a small signle story two bedrooom home, etc. I am certain the same scenario will be found in every other county in… Read more »

Bubba

100% true.
I know a husband and wife not allowed to vote (they did something stupid 50 years ago) they left that box blank and they get Demonkrat registered voter ballots. They were sorry they moved to Oregon. They lost their business during the 2020 riots. Insurance would not pay so they moved to Nebraska to live with their son. Sad, They were hard workers for 20 years. Now they are in their late 70’s.

That’s how pieces of shit like Brown get fraudulently elected.

Bubba

Who’s getting their ballots now and voting with them?