Citizens Rights Group Seeks Emergency Restraining Order Against “Weapon” Ban

Connecticut Citizens Defense League seeks emergency restraining order & preliminary Injunction against unconstitutional so-called “Assault Weapon” gun ban.

Executive Orders Rule Regulation Red Tape
iStock

SEYMOUR, CT –-(AmmoLand.com)- On Friday, February 3, 2023, the Connecticut Citizens Defense League (“CCDL”), in conjunction with the Second Amendment Foundation (“SAF”), filed an Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction in federal court in response to a recent ruling by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”) published on January 31, 2023.

ATF’s new rule suddenly reclassifies certain “other” firearms (firearms that are neither rifles, shotguns, nor pistols) as being “rifles.” This technical change pushes “others” within the definition of “assault weapon” under Connecticut’s ban.

ATF’s new rule impacts tens of thousands of Connecticut residents who are otherwise law-abiding but who have now found themselves facing possible felony prosecution through no fault of their own.

While residents of other states are able to register these firearms with the ATF or change the short barrels for longer ones to make them legal, the ATF has stated that it will not permit any such registrations from Connecticut residents due to Connecticut’s “assault weapon” ban. Nor will changing out the barrels avoid redesignation as banned “assault weapons” under Connecticut law. As such, many thousands of Connecticut residents who were previously authorized by the Connecticut State Police’s Special Licensing and Firearms Unit to purchase these firearms find themselves without the legal options had by residents of most other states.

The Plaintiffs filed this motion for emergency relief in the existing federal action of Grant, et al. v. Lamont, et al., 3:22-cv-01223-JBA, which was originally filed on September 29, 2022. In the lawsuit, CCDL and SAF are accompanied by three individual plaintiffs: Jenny Hamilton, a mom, business owner, and domestic violence victim, as well as Eddie Grant and Michael Stiefel, former corrections officers who each served our state proudly for over twenty years.

“These three plaintiffs, along with tens of thousands of other good, law-abiding Connecticut residents, suddenly find themselves facing possible felony charges, all of which could have disastrous implications for them, their families, their careers, and their standing in the community. Until Tuesday, the firearms at issue were entirely lawful, owned by people who may now face detrimental personal damage due to state laws that are not only unclear and virtually impossible to comply with, but also in blatant and direct violation of the Connecticut and U.S. Constitutions,” says Holly Sullivan, President of the CCDL.

“As such, we are imploring the federal court to step in to protect these otherwise lawful gun owners from being arrested under the new application of Connecticut’s egregious ban on so-called ‘assault weapons,’ which are simply commonly owned modern sporting arms.”

The Connecticut Citizens Defense League, Inc. is a non-profit, non-partisan, grassroots organization of more than 43,000 members, committed to protecting the inalienable constitutional right of all citizens to keep and bear arms through legislative and grassroots advocacy, education, research, publishing, legal action and programs. The Second Amendment Foundation, Inc. is a national organization comprised of more than 700,000 members. For nearly 50 years, the SAF has been a pioneer in the innovative defense of the right to keep and bear arms through its publications, public education and legal action.

Attorney Doug Dubitsky, Attorney Craig Fishbein, and Attorney Cameron Atkinson are representing the Plaintiffs in this federal civil rights action challenging Connecticut’s ban on modern sporting arms.


About Connecticut Citizens Defense League

Connecticut Citizens Defense League, Inc. is a non-profit, non-partisan, grassroots organization of more than 41,000 members, committed to protecting the unalienable constitutional right of all citizens to keep and bear arms through legislative and grassroots advocacy, education, research, publishing, legal action, and programs.

The federal civil rights lawsuit addressed above is officially known as Connecticut Citizens Defense League, Inc., et al. v. Jason Thody, et al. The Plaintiffs are represented by Attorney Doug Dubitsky and Attorney Craig Fishbein.

Follow us at www.ccdl.us

Connecticut Citizens Defense League

6 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bozz

This is a parallel to the ATFs arbitrary rule change on pistol braces.

Bill

Super!

Montana454Casull

I told everybody I know that purchasing those AR pistols with a brace that the ATF would shit backwards on them if enough people buy or build a AR pustol with a brace . They were just waiting for the numbers to become worth while too make thier $200 stamp requirement a money maker for thier corrupt organized crime syndicate.

USMC0351Grunt

Sorry, but this, “agency” no longer serves THE PEOPLE, so it has outlived it’s usefulness. Gotta go

10th Amendment protects against government overreach

https://www.pennlive.com/editorials/2010/05/post_40.html
WebMay 8, 2010 · The Tenth Amendment ensures that liberty belongs to the people and when government oversteps the Constitution and limits our …

  • Estimated Reading Time: 6 mins

Missing: agencyMust include: agency

loveaduck

Why isn’t it possible to open a suit against all states having a ban on assault weapons?

DIYinSTL

This story needs more context. An AR platform lower receiver, stripped or complete, when sold without a completed upper is an “Other.” Or it was. Has that changed?