Gun Control Senators Threaten for Credit Card Tracking Code

By Mark Oliva

SW5905 gun money credit card
IMG Jim Grant

Credit Card Companies ‘Paused’ Firearm Retail-Specific Merchant Category Code. Suddenly, Gun Control Advocates Can’t Live Without Them. Here’s Why.

There’s no bigger proof that the Merchant Category Code (MCC) specific to firearm retailers is really a bad idea than those losing their minds now that major credit card companies announced they won’t put it into practice.

U.S. Sens. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) sent a letter to the Department of Justice and Treasury Department to publish “any policy advisory, enforcement guidance and other materials needed by financial institutions retailers and law enforcement as the new code is implemented for gun an ammunition stores.” That was followed by a letter from 14 state attorneys general, led by New Jersey Democrat AG Matthew Platkin, to the CEOs of the major credit card companies telling them they see “no justifiable reason” to pause implementation of the tracking code.

The attorneys general accused the credit card companies of buckling to political pressure, only to add their own veiled threats if they don’t go along with their gun control scheme.

“Should you fail to do so, your complicity with ongoing needless gun tragedies will lead us to consider further actions,” the attorney general letter states.

How We Got Here

The MCC is the brainchild of Amalgamated Bank’s CEO Priscilla Sims Brown and The New York Times’s Andrew Ross Sorkin, all backed by the Giffords gun control group. Amalgamated Bank has been called “The Left’s Private Banker,” hosting accounts for Political Action Committees for Hillary Rodham Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, U.S. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and the Democratic National Committee. The notion of having credit card companies track firearm purchases caught the attention of antigun lawmakers in state capitols and on Capitol Hill.

A specific code for purchases at firearm retail is fraught with Constitutional concerns. First among them is the fact that those who designed this code publicly announced that this specific code is “just the beginning.” The way it is currently structured, the code would track undefined “suspicious purchases” at firearm retailers, but wouldn’t delve “into the basket” to see what individuals actually purchased. That means the credit card companies would only see total amounts, not individual items. That means purchases for sleeping bags, tents, waders and decoys would be under the same scrutiny as firearms and ammunition.

Pitfalls

That presents serious concerns that these codes could be abused to create a back-door firearm registry. Since the federal government is barred from creating a national firearm registry, these antigun senators and attorneys general would lean on the credit card companies to do that work for them. That would put anyone purchasing at a firearm retailer on a watchlist – even if they didn’t purchase a firearm and ammunition.

It wouldn’t end there, though. The “just the beginning” admonition can’t be interpreted any other way other than the next steps would include scrutiny of examining what is in the shopper’s basket. Sorkin’s original goal was to deny firearm and ammunition purchases with credit cards altogether, but a much more nefarious scheme would be in the offing. Credit cards could be forced by political special interests to divulge personal information to government authorities. That’s more than chilling Constitutional rights. It is an outright intrusion.

This also raises considerable privacy concerns. Firearm owners are rightly wary of their inclusion on any list. As demonstrated, law enforcement authorities in New York and California negligently “leaked” information of concealed carry permit holders to the public. That information now is available to would-be criminals and makes those firearm owners targets for potential crime against them and their household.

State Roadblocks

There is no statutory requirement for credit card companies to track purchases made at firearm retailers. The code is a voluntary measure that was approved by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). It’s not a requirement for credit card companies to implement it. In fact, several states are on the verge of enacting legislation that would specifically prohibit the use of a unique MCC for purchases at a firearm retailer, including West VirginiaMississippi and Florida.

That is the reason the major credit card companies “paused” their MCC implementation plans. Different states would have differing laws pertaining to their use and would sow confusion and uneven application of policies. Despite what these antigun lawmakers and law enforcement officials claim, financial institutions are already required to report suspicious activities that are potential violations of law.

Adding in millions-upon-millions of lawful transactions at firearm retailers doesn’t make communities safer. Even VISA CEO Al Kelly said the codes wouldn’t work as Amalgamated Bank and other gun control advocates wished. “If [Visa’s Chief Communications Officer] K.C. Kavanagh goes into a gun store and buys three thermoses and a tent, and you go in and buy a rifle and five rounds of ammunition, all I know is you both went to the same gun store… But I don’t know what you bought.”

Dumping hundreds of millions of purchase records creates a bigger haystack in which law enforcement must search through to find the proverbial needle.

It all begs the question of why these gun control-supporting politicians and attorneys general are now demanding that credit card companies institute these codes. The answer is simple. They’re being denied the ability to create a national firearm registry that they could exploit to quash lawful firearm ownership in America.

The firearm retailer-specific MCC was never about controlling crime. It has always been about controlling you.


About The National Shooting Sports Foundation

NSSF is the trade association for the firearm industry. Its mission is to promote, protect and preserve hunting and shooting sports. Formed in 1961, NSSF has a membership of thousands of manufacturers, distributors, firearm retailers, shooting ranges, sportsmen’s organizations, and publishers nationwide. For more information, visit nssf.org

National Shooting Sports Foundation

15 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Arizona

They want to track gun owners, and will gladly violate the law, the Constitution, their oaths and every moral and ethical code in order to do so…. as their ultimate goal is to attain a monopoly on violence and arms, and use that to enslave citizens.

Barrett 50 Cal

Pay cash send a message to CC companies not the idiots on the hill.
Take money from banks? Yes send them the message. They will buckle.

xtphreak

@musicman44mag The subject of the article is not a “shipping code”. It’s a code like to ones that allow Visa / Master Card etc to “organize” your receipts by type. Grocery Gas Restaurant etc If it were a “shipping code” by which a package could be identified as containing a firearm, it would violate federal law. 18 U.S.C. § 922 – U.S. Code – Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 922. Unlawful acts. Specifically (e) which reads: “…(e) It shall be unlawful for any person …. No common or contract carrier shall require or cause any label, tag, or… Read more »

hippybiker

Is it just me or, does any rational person think that the average criminal probably wouldn’t use a credit card to obtain firearms? The vast majority probably wouldn’t pass a background check! This to me suggests that the politicians are either stupid or, it’s an evil plan! Maybe both!

DarthDoug

It’s an evil plan. It’s not about criminals, it’s about everyone else… So buy like a criminal: cash is king.

One of the biggest mistakes we make is thinking that the politicians are stupid. Evil, manipulative, calculating, vindictive, and power-mad yes, but not stupid.

Last edited 1 year ago by DarthDoug
Hazcat

Don’t worry NSSF. Your “partners at the ATF” won’t abuse this.

Cruiser

They say history repeats it’s self, this is 1938 all over again it was evil then and it’s evil now.

Steve

What the hell do you think “87,000” new IRS agents were supposed to be hired on for…going after Tip taxes on waitresses?

StLPro2A

“Should you fail to do so, your complicity with ongoing needless gun tragedies will lead us to consider further actions,” the attorney general letter states. Supporting the codes will make one complicit with mass genocide by the likes of Mao, Chavez, Hitler, Stalin……

Tionico

“will result in further actions”?

Am I dreaming or does this sound a LOT like Al Capone saying something like “I KNOW you’ll do the right thing”.

J.galt

Just as “The firearm retailer-specific MCC was never about controlling crime. It has always been about controlling you” is a true statement, the NSSF being atf’s bitch can’t be trusted not to be a partner in any control coming down the pike

Steve

Nope. Wayne has his own set of greedy hook setting to deal with – but, the ATF is sole butt buddies with NSSF as far as I know. I always wonder why the NSSF never, ever addresses OUR concerns over their “special relationship” with the ATF?

Montana454Casull

Credit card tracking code will lead to scissor card elimination act .

Tionico

or wheelbarrows full of Dead Banjamins

Toxic Deplorable Racist SAH

I don’t care if the MCC is on pause or not. Once warned, twice shy. When I get back to the task of purchasing “stuff” and “freedom seeds”, I’ll plan ahead, and withdraw cash from my financial institute ATM a little at a time over a period of weeks. Then pay cash for my purchase. No MCC/plastic/credit card involved. One statement in particular got me shaking my head, and chuckling. “The attorneys general accused the credit card companies of buckling to political pressure, only to add their own veiled threats if they don’t go along with their gun control scheme.… Read more »