Fed Judge On NJ Gun Law “plainly unconstitutional”, Grants Prelim. Injunction Against State

Governor Phil Murphy
Governor Phil Murphy

A federal judge in New Jersey on Tuesday granted a preliminary injunction in part against certain tenets in the Garden State’s revised gun permit law, Chapter 131, chalking up a win for the Second Amendment Foundation and its lawsuit partners.

In her meticulously-researched 235-page ruling, Chief U.S. District Court Judge Renee Marie Bumb writes;

“The Constitution leaves the States some measures to combat handgun violence. But what the Second Amendment prohibits the States from doing, and what the State of New Jersey has done here with much of Chapter 131, is to ‘prevent law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their right to keep and bear arms.’ That is plainly unconstitutional.

“Bruen required the State to bring its firearm laws in compliance with the Second Amendment,” Judge Bumb adds. “Chapter 131 was the State’s response, but it went too far, becoming the kind of law that Founding Father Thomas Jefferson would have warned against since it ‘disarm[s] only those who are not inclined or determined to commit crimes [and] worsen[s] the plight of the assaulted, but improve[s] those of the assailants.’”

SAF is joined in this case by the Coalition of New Jersey Firearm Owners, New Jersey Second Amendment Society, Firearms Policy Coalition, and three private citizens, Nicholas Gaudio, Jeffrey Muller and Ronald Koons, the latter for whom the case, Koons v. Platkin, is named. Attorney David Jensen of Beacon, N.Y represents them.

“Judge Bumb’s ruling clearly recognizes the issues we raised with New Jersey’s restrictive gun law, and she’s fired a legal shot across the state’s bow,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “When New Jersey passed Chapter 131, it did away with the ‘justifiable need’ requirement, but replaced it with an equally egregious ‘sensitive places’ restriction to effectively prohibit carrying a legally-licensed handgun anywhere in the state. That just doesn’t pass the smell test.”

Adam Kraut, SAF’s executive director and a practicing attorney, agreed, stating, “Today’s order granting our preliminary injunction against the State of New Jersey’s anti-carry law reaffirms that the rule of law is alive and well. After the Supreme Court decided Bruen last summer, the State of New Jersey enacted a series of restrictions that were wholly incompatible with the Constitution and disregarded the Supreme Court’s directive. It is unfortunate that a lawsuit was required in order to force the State to respect its residents constitutional right to bear arms. We look forward to continuing to litigate these issues in New Jersey, and across the nation, to ensure constitutional rights are not meaningless words on paper.”

Koons v. Platkin ~ Fed. Judge Grants Prelim. Injunction Against Tenets Of NJ Gun Law


The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 720,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control

17 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Colt

The States should be forced to pay for illegal laws.. If you or I did something illegal to the State, I guarantee your, sweet bippy, they’d fine and sue your ass into eternity..

When the states do it.. nothing is done except waste your tax dollars… somehow, there needs to be consequences for this.

Darkman

2 words…Qualified Immunity.

Rob

Which needs to go away in every respect. All actions have consequences. Rendering certain groups immune from the consequences of their actions only widens the gap between the peasants and their government overlords.

Laddyboy

@Darkman; Qualified Immunity DISAPPEARS when these “politicians” BREAK their SWORN OATH-OF-OFFICE!!!

gregs

yeah, yeah, tell the courts that. common sense would dictate such but…

TGP389

Yeah, it’s like trying to find an attorney to sue an attorney. Good luck.

Bubba

Death to qualified immunity.

totbs

These unconstitutional laws will never stop until qualified immunity goes away. It doesn’t have to be a blanket elimination, as that would make it impossible to govern, but there should not be any immunity for politicians who write and make laws that are in violation of the Constitution and the BOR. How I wish! If that were the law in WA ST, AG Ferguson would be more broke than a pauper. He’s ruined many a life standing behind qualified immunity. Now the POS is running for governor.

Bill

The primary strategy of tyranny everywhere is to appropriate the assets of the people and use them to control the people. America has very little defense against this, through taxation and legislated prohibitions of every imaginable kind, as we see every day. Tyrants take freedom and use funds taken from citizens to employ police and military to enforce their will, and the people pathetically have to pay with what they have left to ask the courts if they might be kindly granted a few of their rights back. Paying people in political power to take away our rights, and then… Read more »

Last edited 11 months ago by Bill
TGP389

Waste our tax dollars and maybe lock us up until the law is struck down. Meanwhile, we’ve been forced to “dance” with Bubba, and might have caught AIDS.

Cappy

I may have missed something here, but the judge actually appears to make some sense.

JH

The same play California is making.

Darkman

It’s called the ‘Long Game’ tactic. Continually tweak the legislation, each time it’s struck down in Court. All the while waiting for a court to see thing their way. Liberal Democrats have been doing it for decades. That was where the 1973 Abortion ruling came from. Playing the ‘Long Game’. They’ve done the same thing with public education. Indoctrinating children since the late 70s in the Liberalism/Socialism ideology. working toward the Transformative society the Obama spoke so fondly of, on numerous occasions. As long as their ideology is allowed to manifest itself within society. Constitutional Rights will always be it’s… Read more »

RichDD

Now there needs to be action for those of us who can’t afford the $200.00+ to get our CCW. Another tactic to stop the poor from getting their CCW.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but aren’t the people of color in the big cities that elect these fools the poor ones??

Last edited 11 months ago by RichDD
lktraz

Yes. Yes they are.

Sadly, they are so indoctrinated that they end up, in effect, enslaving themselves and the rest of us are affected by their actions.

It must be maddening to live in the Garbag…….uh Garden State and realize that just across the river is a “shall issue” state where most of the counties only charge $20 or so for a 5 year CCW permit.

Laddyboy

WHO IS PAYING FOR THESE FRIVOLOUS COURT CASES BROUGHT BY THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMUNIST PARTY? These “politicians” who are doing these ANTI-AMERICAN, ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL “laws” MUST BEAR THE ENTIRE LAWYER AND COURT FINANCIAL COSTS for this NONSENSICAL BEHAVIOR!!!

Wass

Hopefully, there’s a bit of light at the end of the tunnel. Kudos to SAF.