Below The Radar: HR 6225

Below the Radar: The Multiple Firearm Sales Reporting Modernization Act of 2019
Below The Radar: HR 6225

Chicago/United States – -(AmmoLand.com)- Loyal Ammoland readers rightly look forward to what they expect will be a favorable ruling in NYSRPA v. Bruen (the extent remains to be seen). However, they should not think that anti-Second Amendment extremists will give up. Far from it, if legislation introduced earlier this month by Representative Robin Kelly (D-IL) is any indication. This bill is one of the types of legislative attacks that NYSRPA v. Bruen, for all the good it will do, can’t stop.

HR 6225 is titled as a bill to “modernize the business of selling firearms.” Well, when it comes from an anti-Second Amendment extremist like Representative Kelly and is co-sponsored by other anti-Second Amendment extremists, it’s clear that a more accurate descript would be calling this a bill to “drown gun stores in red ink and red tape.” Don’t take my word for it, look at the press release her office put out.

Now, nobody denies that there probably is a need to address modern technology vis-à-vis the Second Amendment, and there is plenty of room for real reforms (not the snake oil anti-Secod Amendment extremists are selling). With NICS and computers, there is no need for a multi-week licensing process to own firearms, not can a similarly lengthy permit-to-purchase scheme stand. And we can also largely dispense with restrictions on what can and cannot be purchased based on crossing state lines.

But Kelly’s not doing that sort of modernization. As noted in the press release, there are a host of new restrictions imposed on firearms dealers. Much of the justification is crime in Chicago. Now, you may be familiar with the crap Kim Foxx has pulled. Take, for instance, that “mutual combat” gunfight from a couple of months ago.

Foxx’s bullshit aside, this is exactly the kind of case a local official should be referring to the US Attorney’s office to look into using 18 USC 922 and 18 USC 924. Members of gangs in cities like Chicago, Baltimore, and Philadelphia (among others) are ripe for prosecution under those statutes.

Put it this way, someone who uses a fake ID in West Virginia to buy a single Glock pistol to arm a gang member with felonies on his rap sheet can be put away for up to 20 years on just that single Glock alone. That gang member can get up to 10 years just for possessing the gun. That goes without considering the many enhancements in 18 USC 924.

Contrary to what you may hear from some self-appointed Second Amendment commissars, not using these statutes in these cases does us little good. Given what Representative Kelly wants to inflict on your local gun dealer, who in all likelihood does take steps to keep their inventory secure, and who helps you and others exercise their Second Amendment rights, using those provisions is an easy way to head off her legislation at the pass.

The fact is legislation like HR 6225 will be a threat. The best way to stop it is to defeat anti-Second Amendment extremists like Robin Kelly via the ballot box at the federal, state, and local levels. Needless to say, Second Amendment supporters need to contact their Representative and Senators and politely urge them to oppose this legislation.


About Harold Hutchison

Writer Harold Hutchison has more than a dozen years of experience covering military affairs, international events, U.S. politics and Second Amendment issues. Harold was consulting senior editor at Soldier of Fortune magazine and is the author of the novel Strike Group Reagan. He has also written for the Daily Caller, National Review, Patriot Post, Strategypage.com, and other national websites.Harold Hutchison

32 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Wild Bill

Like hell we don’t deny it! The founders were very much into new technology of all kinds (e.g. Ben Franklin, a founder and Rights supporter, was very much into electricity, mechanics, and weight lifting.) The technology of firearms was very much on the mind of the founders.
The problem is politicians that think they are as smart as the founders, smarter than the population, and no longer work for their constituents.
Harold, as hard as this is for me to write … have a Merry Christmas.

Grinning Dragon

[quote]Now, nobody denies that there probably is a need to address modern technology vis-à-vis the Second Amendment, and there is plenty of room for real reforms (not the snake oil anti-Second Amendment extremists are selling).[/quote] There isn’t any need to address modern tech, it’s already been addressed by the clear wording of the 2nd Amendment and as to “real reforms” if you are inferring the complete elimination/repeal of all anti 2nd Amendment laws and regs sure that is a reform I can get behind, but seeing as I’ve read quite a few of your postings, your content with giving the… Read more »

uncle dudley

These idiot congress people won’t put the blame where it belongs, with the criminals who commit the crimes and lock their butts up, instead they shift the blame to FFL holders and try to make them the bad guy’s.
Most crimes involving firearms were not bought in a store by the criminal using it.

TexDad

Re: commissars

That’s your term for people who reject your Fudd mentality. You’ve tried so hard to coin it, and it’s not working.

We should reject your way of thinking though, Harold. The no compromise approach has gained us ground, for a change. But you can’t see that.

Please go away. <- politely urging

Happy Everafter

Half of a politician’s life is spent proving that they support the opinion of the folks who voted for them, i.e. for socialist/communists issuing incessant anti-gun press releases.
The other half is spent kissing the almighty Soros’ butt.
“…shall not be infringed.” You remember, the Oath and all the silly stuff they swore to uphold!

TexDad

If by modernizing you mean one party hands over payment and one party hands over the firearm, with no asking the government permission for what government is forbidden to deny, then I’m with you.

I don’t think I’m with you though.

Arizona

This bill doesn’t even have any text yet! The press release only mentions several bad and unconstitutional bills that were introduced and died before even making it out of or to committee. This is fear mongering, plain and simple click bait article.

Dr. Strangelove

Marxists like Kelly and Foxx won’t stop until we are disarmed and their shock troops, the gangs, are ruling the streets. I’m a truck driver, and if I get caught with a gun in Chicago, I won’t be let go like the “mutual combat” gang bangers, it’ll be straight to a felony pod at 26th and California.

UncleT

Just when I think you might be coming around Harold you post this crap. You seem to think criminal abide by the laws. They don’t. You also seem to think our Bill Of Rights are negotiable because of technology? They’re not! Technology and weapons evolve, our individual rights do not. Besides, 2A is not for personal protection or for individuals to impel rebellion but for each state to retain its own militia, a well-regulated one, and its residents to adhere to the state’s directives to ensure the state remains secure & free. With new Technology or not.