Broadly speaking, the concerns raised dealt with the practicalities of whetheror not firearms handed into SAPS in terms of the Amnesty can be safely secured.
Democrats long-ago decided that a national strategy of manufacturing victims, and ever-expanding the “victim-class,” would keep them in power, forever..
The real objection is to any American having rights forcibly stripped without full due process.
Venezuela is following a predictable pattern of dictators as they feel threatened. They disarm the general population, while allowing loyalists to be armed.
“Americans have the will to resist, because you have weapons. When you don’t have a gun, ‘freedom of speech’ has no power.” ~ Yoshimi Ishikawa
Target allows men to use the same restrooms as ten-year-old girls and has made it clear that it would prefer law-abiding citizens to enter its stores unarmed.
Chief Kennedy is calling for residents in his town to carry guns to fight terrorism…
A disarmist admits that gun turn in events, (in Orwellian terms “buy back”), do not reduce crime. He gives the real reason for the events. Propaganda.
Ask you subject whether or not a man or a woman (any human being) has a legitimate right to self-defense. Does a person posses the legal right to defend themselves against unlawful attack?