Opinion

If you can legally carry a concealed firearm in your home state, you should be able to do the same when you travel across state lines. That’s common sense. It’s consistent with the Constitution. And thanks to the Supreme Court, it’s increasingly clear that it should be the law.
America doesn’t tell travelers to give up their First Amendment rights at a state border. It doesn’t say that Ohioans lose free speech in New Jersey, or that Texans lose Fourth Amendment protections when landing at LAX. Yet with the Second Amendment, some states act as if constitutional rights stop at their borders.
They don’t.
One Nation, One Right
National reciprocity doesn’t force states to adopt identical gun laws. It simply ensures that law-abiding citizens with valid concealed-carry permits are recognized across state lines, just as driver’s licenses are. Permit holders still follow local rules about where firearms may be carried, and dangerous individuals remain barred. Reciprocity respects both safety and freedom.
We already honor countless licenses nationwide, from marriage certificates to professional credentials. If a state has vetted and licensed a citizen to carry, other states should respect that judgment, unless they can justify a contrary rule under Bruen’s historical-tradition standard.
The Supreme Court Has Spoken
Heller (2008) confirmed the individual right to possess firearms for self-defense. McDonald (2010) extended that protection to the states. Bruen (2022) struck down New York’s “proper cause” requirement and reinforced that law-abiding citizens have the right to carry outside the home. Justice Thomas wrote:
“When the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct. The government must then justify its regulation by demonstrating that it is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.”
Historical records show that early American states did not deny travelers the right to bear arms simply because they weren’t locals.
Reciprocity Works for Drivers—Why Not Gun Owners?
Some argue that differing standards make reciprocity unsafe. But we already accept different driver standards nationwide. A 16-year-old licensed in Montana can drive in New Jersey, even though New Jersey law requires residents to be at least 17 to drive. The system works because states respect each other’s licenses.
The same principle should apply to firearms: if another state doubts a permit’s standards, it can still enforce its own location restrictions fairly—but it cannot deny the fundamental right itself.
Law-Abiding Gun Owners Are Safe
Nationwide, concealed carry permit holders are among the most law-abiding Americans. Studies from Texas, Florida, Minnesota, and beyond show permit holders commit firearm crimes at a fraction of one percent, far below the general population. According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, over 22 million Americans hold concealed-carry permits as of 2024, and they remain consistently law-abiding.
Additional evidence confirms this:
- In Colorado, permit holders had a monthly crime rate of 5.7 per 100,000, compared to 530.3 per 100,000 in the general population.
- An analysis of 20 states with Permitless carry laws before 2023 found 12 saw decreases in violent crime rates, with Missouri, New Hampshire, and Tennessee showing the largest drops.
- The Heritage Foundation reports that from 2007 to 2022, concealed-carry permits increased by over 300%, yet permit holders were involved in only 0.7% of firearm-related homicides.
Responsible, law-abiding citizens who carry firearms are part of the solution, not the problem. National reciprocity ensures they remain lawful citizens, even when crossing state lines.
Congress Must Act
The Constitution does not switch off at a state line. After Bruen, states have little justification to deny recognition of out-of-state permits with comparable standards.
At a minimum, Congress should pass legislation that:
- Requires states to honor out-of-state permits;
- Preserves states’ ability to regulate truly sensitive places using the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm requirement, as Justice Thomas mandated in Bruen.
This is about restoring constitutional balance, honoring federalism, and protecting the rights of responsible Americans.
The Second Amendment is not a suggestion; it is the law. Bruen reaffirmed that. The Constitution does not end at your state line, and neither should your rights.
Take Action
Contact your Senators and Representatives, write, or email—and demand support for national reciprocity:
- U.S. Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121 – operators connect you to your senator or representative.
- Senators: www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm
- Find Your Representative: www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative
Remind them: your rights are not negotiable, not conditional, and not confined by borders. The Second Amendment is not a second-class right, and we will not allow it to be treated as one.
Our elected officials still listen, if only to keep their jobs. Make sure they hear you.
About Sean Maloney.
Sean Maloney is a criminal defense attorney, co-founder of Second Call Defense, and an NRA-certified firearms instructor. He is a nationally recognized speaker on critical topics including the Second Amendment, self-defense, the use of lethal force, and concealed carry. Sean has worked on numerous use-of-force and self-defense cases and has personally trained hundreds of civilians to respond safely and legally to life-threatening situations. He is a passionate advocate for restoring the cultural legitimacy of the Second Amendment and promoting personal responsibility in self-defense.


The House sent this very legislation to the senate during Pres. Trump’s first term and Senator Charles Grassley pigeonholed it and said “it was the wrong time” for such legislation. Never forget it was a REPUBLICAN senator that killed national concealed carry reciprocity.
Oh, please, Lord. Let me live to see senator Chuck Schumer have a cow, when concealed carry reciprocity is signed into law.
National Reciprocity makes exceedingly good sense. That alone is enough to ensure it never sees the light of day.
When I first saw the graphic for the article I was confused about “federal” on the sharks’ fins. After thinking about it, the only federal law I can think of that would cause a problem would be the gun free school zone law that basically makes it illegal for anyone who doesn’t have a permit… from that state… to be within 1000 ft of a school with a firearm, even when driving down ANY road that puts them within 1000 ft of a school. Is there any other federal law that causes problems for people carrying firearms in a different… Read more »
Not going to happen until the Republicans have a 60 vote majority in the Senate. This is why it gets deferred. Why bring a bill to the floor that’s going down in flames? With the government shutdown going on interminably until who knows when, these types of bills are off the table. I agree with other comments, why is a bill even needed when the Constitution has already declared it a right.
It seems to me that driver license holders have the same laws regardless of which state they travel in. So why should there be a difference in CCW laws from state to state? From different countries, yes, but not from different states from the SAME country!
I understand there are states that have politicians who are on power trips, and like to lord it over their citizens, but shouldn’t self defense be universal?
Reciprocity= the trap that your right has been turned into a privilege that you are required to pay for and be subject to a background check, pictures and fees every 4 to 6 years depending on where you live.
SCREW reciprocity. Constitutional Carry without Exception is the only answer to breaking out of the governments grip of making our right into a privilege.
OK, so my state, Arizona is a Constitutional Carry state. I have an Arizona CCW for insurance purposes only. If I did not bother to get a CCW your interpretation of the reciprocity clause would still allow me to carry Herr Walther concealed in San Francisco. So anyone with an Arizona ID would be granted Constitutional Carry coast to coast. Why not get the lawyers and politicians out of the mix entirely and declare Constitutional Carry coast to coast? We are talking about Natural Right here, not some constructive privilege like driving a vehicle. Chuck Grassley and his hesitancy to… Read more »
i am amused at the progs who scream for nation-wide background checks on all firearms and abortion on demand yet at the same time scream that national reciprocity would lead to another bloodbath (the bigfoot of the anti’s). it seems like they only like baby bloodbaths marriage license and drivers license from one state are recognized in all the other states. so what is the big deal, why not national reciprocity? especially for one of our core Constitutional rights. the big deal is progs rule using feelings and dare i say lies, not by the rule of law or using… Read more »
HR218 aka LEOSA
Has set a good precedent for national reciprocity