TEMPLE, Texas -(Ammoland.com)- Open Carry Texas has aggressively fought for constitutional carry legislation since its founding in 2013. Constitutional carry is simply defined as the right to carry a firearm without a license if you can legally purchase and possess one.
It does not change who is prohibited by law from carrying (felons, domestic abusers, etc.). Texans should be able to walk into a gun shop, purchase a handgun after passing a background check, and immediately holster and carry that handgun without having to obtain a government permission slip or pay a second amendment tax.
Licensing schemes only present roadblocks to law abiding citizens since criminals, by definition, don’t obey laws.
Opponents of this legislation invoke scary language like “blood in the streets,” “felons will be able to carry,” “violent crime will increase,” and “law enforcement won’t be able to tell the good guys from the bad guys.” These are all faulty arguments that have no basis in reality.
Texas, once again, is not the driving engine on this issue; we are the caboose. Currently, 12 states have constitutional carry: Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Kansas, Missouri,Minnesota, Arkansas, Mississippi, West Virginia, Vermont and Maine.
An additional 21 states do not require a license to open carry. That makes Texas one of only 17 states that require a license to carry at all (five of which outright ban open carry).
After Arizona passed constitutional carry in 2010, violent crime dipped over 20 percent. In Mississippi, the law enforcement community overwhelmingly opposed constitutional carry when it was passed last year, but those same groups have had to admit that it’s been a “non-issue.”
With two-thirds of the United States allowing some form of unlicensed carry and none of the doom and gloom predictions having come true there, all the arguments against it are baseless here.
We urge our legislators to pass constitutional carry this session. Since the 84th Legislative Session, the number of states where the unlicensed free exercise of the right to keep and bear arms is recognized has increased from five to twelve – a 120 percent increase!
With a supposedly conservative and “pro-gun” majority in both chambers, along with a self-described “pro-gun” Lieutenant Governor and Governor, the only people standing in the way of these rights are Republicans.
There is no excuse not to pass it. If the support isn’t there, as Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick claims, then bring it to a vote so we can see where the lack of support exists to hold them accountable next election cycle.
The Republican Party of Texas platform lists constitutional carry as its number one priority. We expect Republicans in Austin to enforce the will of the people and implement the platform agenda on gun rights.
Below are two maps to visualize the state of gun rights in our country.
This is a map of all the states that require a license, allow open carry without a license, or allow unlicensed open and concealed carry (constitutional carry).
This is a simplified map of all the states that allow SOME FORM of unlicensed carry, bundling together the constitutional carry states with the unlicensed open carry states. It’s easy to see here how little Texas recognizes the rights of the people to keep and bear arms.
About Open Carry Texas:
Our purpose is to 1) educate all Texans about their right to carry in a safe manner; 2) to condition Texans to feel safe around law-abiding citizens that choose to carry them; 3) encourage our elected officials to pass constitutional carry legislation for all firearms;
and 4) foster a cooperative relationship with local law enforcement in the furtherance of these goals with an eye towards preventing negative encounters.
Why are there no internet articles lately on this subject? The latest stories I read are dated late January.
I am following what is happening in texasome regarding Constitutional Carry very closely.
I would like to see some of the same attention paid to Indiana House Bill 1159. Which is the Indiana state version of Constitutional Carry
Please explain the logic to me. You can own a vehicle and operate it on private property without a license. In order to take that vehicle on public roads, you actually need to prove to the state that you can drive. So you think people should be allowed to take a weapon in public without proving that they can shoot? I’m all for concealed carry that involves licensing and actually proving that you can shoot straight, but this idiocy would allow a mentally handicapped person with an 80 IQ to carry in public. Someone who may not even know the… Read more »
The platform of the Republican Party of Texas lists “Constitutional Carry” in paragraph #149 out of 266 paragraphs.
Your assertion that it is the #1 priority is untrue.
Your inability to make factual statements and maps destroys the credibility of your organization. As a Texas gun owner you embarrass me.
I suppose my biggest heartburn comes from the Texas Constitution, Article 1, Bill of Rights. Sec. 23. RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS. Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the lawful defense of himself or the State; but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms, with a view to prevent crime. The part about “but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms, with a view to prevent crimes” was added by the military provisional governor after the civil war. It was not… Read more »
You have your reds wrong too, in those states it’s “Shall Issue” meaning for 99% of the people living there it’s “Fat Chance”. It should read Unlawful.