By John Farnam
Ft Collins, CO –-(Ammoland.com)- Mental Illness:
This morning’s double-murder in VA brings up a difficult subject: “mental illness.” And one that is hard to discuss frankly without incurring criticism and hurting feelings.
So not all will like, nor appreciate, the following:
Whatever the current buzz-word/psycho-babble term in vogue, be it “ disturbed,” issues with “anger management,” “emotionally unstable,” “ schizophrenic” (whatever that means), “troubled”, “EDP,” “criminally insane,” “ crazy,” “psychopathic,” et al, these people are extremely dangerous, as we see!
Since we no longer have mental hospitals, people who are genuinely mentally ill are now freely mixed-in with the general population. Many make up the legions of “homeless.” Many more are in prison.
Others are supported by their families, but in most cases their families are as frightened of them as is everyone else, and thus want nothing to do with them!
Still others are semi-functional, are occasionally employed (but never for long), but people around them quickly pick-up on the fact that they have emotional issues. Like alcoholics, they learn ways to camouflage their “ craziness,” but it invariably leaks out often enough to put people on edge. That is why they are unable to hold a job for anything but brief periods.
What to do?
As a society, I don’t know! Causes and cures are hard to come by. I’m not sure anyone really knows much about “mental illness.” Still fewer, despite all their degrees, have any capacity to “cure” the problem. We do know it represents a major issue in all cultures, races, and venues.
Should churches and other charitable groups try to “help” these people? Can they be helped? It’s, of course, a matter of personal conscience. But, we can never forget that any amount of exposure always entails real personal jeopardy.
Healthcare professionals and LEOs are, of course, expected to deal with the mentally ill, but they do so at great personal risk, and they know it!
As a family, or employer, should you “take-in” the “troubled” or “ disturbed” youth? Many do, and again, it is a decision of conscience. But, NEVER DISCOUNT THE SIGNIFICANT RISK TO YOU PERSONALLY! It is real and sometimes manifests itself as it did this morning! (warning disturbing video)
As an individual, the most pragmatic/practical advice I can render is:
Have nothing to do with these people. As soon as it becomes obvious that a person has pernicious emotional issues, separate from them immediately, permanently!
You probably cannot “help” them in any event, and significant risk attaches to every contact, as noted above. All of your regular friends should be stable, established, functional, “normal.” None are perfect, of course, but the chronically unstable make poor, and dangerous, company, as we see!
In the end, it comes down to personal management of “risk exposure.” None makes for a boring and pointless life. Too much makes for a frustrating, and short, life. Neither extreme is in your best interest.
My personal philosophy is that my share of danger, maybe more than my share, will likely come my way through no encouragement on my part. I’ll do my best to prepare for it, and deal with it appropriately when it rears its ugly head.
But, there must be an acceptable risk/benefit balance associated with everything I contemplate doing.
Great risk, associated with scant benefit is, in my view, the very definition of a “bad deal!”
“‘Happiness’ is nothing more than good health… and a bad memory” ~ Albert Schweitzer
/John
About John Farnam & Defense Training International, Inc
As a defensive weapons and tactics instructor John Farnam will urge you, based on your own beliefs, to make up your mind in advance as to what you would do when faced with an imminent and unlawful lethal threat. You should, of course, also decide what preparations you should make in advance, if any. Defense Training International wants to make sure that their students fully understand the physical, legal, psychological, and societal consequences of their actions or inactions.
It is our duty to make you aware of certain unpleasant physical realities intrinsic to the Planet Earth. Mr Farnam is happy to be your counselor and advisor. Visit: www.defense-training.com
You as the author are advocating shunning as the answer to association with mentally ill persons. That is not the answer. Would you shun your spouse because of depression?
What an unadulterated load of BS! Lots of myths, stereotypes, unfounded opinions, bigotry… If any of your former students were really brave, willing to be honest with you after you’ve shown your ignorance & bigotry, you’d probably find that just like the national average, about 20% of them have some form of brain disease. Listen to the experts, the people who know what they’re talking about because of experience & education. And stick to your own area of expertise. I don’t listen to actors when they talk about politics, why should I listen to you in this case? Because the… Read more »
With the greatest regard for your extraordinary firearms training: No, John, I don’t like what you say. But I suspect that what I don’t know about defense training is comparable to what you don’t know about mental illness. The mentally ill act violently less than the general public. You’ve trained many thousands of people to shoot, John. You didn’t realize that about 1 in 5 of them had some psychiatric illness at the time, as is always the case. You can’t avoid them, because they don’t usually stand out. They’re just people like you and me dealing with their problems.… Read more »
“All of your regular friends should be stable, established, functional, “normal.”” Damn, I guess I’ll have to let go of my liberal friends.
As one of those “mental health practitioners” who often work with mentally ill folks, I have a couple of pertinent observations about the article. 1) The vast majority of citizens are not capable of recognizing mental illness when they see it in others. The media depictions are vastly off, and most people either blow off major symptoms as “personality quirks” or else see ANY sort of social oddity as proof positive of mental illness. This suggests that it may be very difficult to follow the article’s prescription to avoid people with mental illness. 2) As far as being careful of… Read more »
I suppose it could be said that anyone who willfully decides to obtain a weapon, knife, hammer, ball bat, iron pipe or even a firearm and kill another human being for merely existing probably has a few deck plates that are not securely fastened. I happen to be good friends with several people who work with and around the mentally disturbed among us and they are not optimistic about the probability of “curing” them. They persist in their efforts only out of a sense of duty and I admire them for that. Mr. Farnam is in some cases correct in… Read more »
the author of the article hits the nail on the head . and also apparently a number of the easily offended , which is what america is made up of these days. the mentally ill are the main reason that these horrific crimes are so prevalent in america and maybe the rest of the civilized world . other than euthanizing the mentally ill or locking them up there is really no solution .
The author was right, in that he would be attacked. But I’m glad that someone other than myself has brought up the pertinent issue, in that we have a lot of violent mentally ill people among us. When Ronald Reagan relaxed the mental health laws that we had protecting us, he unleashed a Pandora’s Box of evil upon us. Now, if we are to commit someone, they have to be an immediate danger to themselves or others before that can be done. What that means is that they have to attack someone in plain sight, or themselves. Only then can… Read more »
What I do know is growing up in the 50’s in Michigan there were Mental institutions that took care of the mentally Ill folks then the liberals got into their lets help them out and started closing all the Mental hospitals. So now what you have is they are either in prison with the criminals or they are walking among us. Thank to the bleeding heart Liberals, bottom line bring back the mental institutions so we can help them. The only problem now is how/who defines sane vs Insane, we probably should start in Washington DC.
Wow, looks like Farnam has awakened some “mental health” activists (or just a couple of fruit cakes)! Bottom line is he is correct. There once was a time when these folks could be checked in to state home mental facilities for treatment by them selves, family or authorities after court hearings. Now they thanks to the ACLU, which and this is fact, is a communist found law organization, these folks run free on the streets-for a miserable life and are not to be helped. Many are the so-called homeless folks (which degrades the real homeless folks who are trying to… Read more »