Our Next Battle Rifle “Improvement” Should Be a New Cartridge

Opinion

Ft Collins, CO –-(Ammoland.com)- What we currently call the “M4″ has been, in various forms, our standard Infantry rifle since the 1960s.

As with any new piece of critical equipment that is haphazardly rushed into service in the middle of a war (Vietnam), testing was inadequate (much of it glossed-over), and there were thus a number of “start-up problems” when this new rifle hit the field, some of which proved fatal to more than one young soldier!

The episode represents an unsavory chapter in our military history, and many in my generation have not forgotten, and never will!

Over the next sixty years, the rifle and caliber (5.56×45) stuck around. In fact, we still have it. To their credit, the Pentagon has since made many improvements, addressing specific issues. And, our industrial sector, producing M4s for the consuming public, also made changes. Some good; some silly!

As a result, today’s M4 Rifle runs about as well as any military rifle ever has. But, like all military rifles, it has issues that are endemic:

  • The extractor is small and weak. Tends to break, along with the extractor spring. For that reason, I carry a spare BCG (bolt-carrier group) with me. Replacing the extractor in the field is a little tedious. Replacing the BCG is easy and takes seconds. And like all serious Operators, I have an MGI “D-Ring” installed on all my M4s.
  • The M4 needs to be wet. We once thought in a desert environment, like Iraq, less lubrication was required. The exact opposite is true! In hot, dry, gritty climates, much lubrication is necessary, in order to keep grit in suspension and keep the rifle running. High-tech coatings and surface treatments alter that formula a little.

But, when you’re carrying an M4 for serious purposes in a hot, dry, windy, gritty place:

1) Keep it wet
2) Keep the dust-cover closed
3) Keep a magazine inserted

When you keep your M4 wet and keep grit out of the receiver, it will run and run!

The positive side of the M4 Rifle:

  • Weight. The M4 battle rifle is significantly lighter than any gas-piston rifle, and has fewer moving parts. In battle, every ounce that must be carried is a burden, particularly at high altitude! Light guns translate to more ammunition!
  • Accuracy. The production version of the M4 is a two-moa rifle, unheard of prior to the arrival of the Stoner System! For all their wonderful attributes, production versions of the M1 and M14 are four-moa guns. Most Kalashnikovs are five, plus!
  • Heat. The genius of the Stoner System is that, during rapid fire, heat is spread-out over the entire receiver, instead of being concentrated in the gas-piston area. Thus, the rifle heats-up slower than is the case for most gas-piston systems.

Heckler & Koch M27 Rifle

Heckler & Koch M27 Rifle
Heckler & Koch M27 Rifle

The Marines, weary of waiting for someone at the Pentagon to actually make a decision, have unilaterally gone over to a gas-piston version of the M4, made by H&K (HK 416). They call it the M27. It’s a sound system, no doubt, but significantly heavier [and 3xpensive at a reported $3000 ea] than the M4 it is replacing.

The rest of our military is still sitting on a fence.

For all the raging debate, it is my opinion that the rifle itself is not our main problem. The Stoner System, while far from perfect, is just fine!

The problem is the rifle caliber with which we have been stuck since Vietnam!

5.56x45 cartridge
5.56×45 cartridge

The 5.56×45 cartridge (“militarized” version of the 223 Rem) lacks adequate range and penetration for military applications. This range/penetration problem is not soluble within that caliber, and never will be!

For domestic law enforcement and personal defense, the 5.56×45 is acceptable.

But, in a battle rifle, the 5.56 comes up short. I’ve lived through a least half-dozen attempts to “improve” the cartridge, and provide it with satisfactory range and penetration. Each succeeding “wonder bullet,” despite all the promotion, has failed to live up to the hype!

The Pentagon needs to worry less about a new rifle, and more about a new caliber!

We need, once more, a 500m rifle that shoots bullets that actually go THROUGH things! We don’t have anything close to that now!

/John

Defense Training International, Inc

About John Farnam & Defense Training International, Inc
As a defensive weapons and tactics instructor John Farnam will urge you, based on your own beliefs, to make up your mind in advance as to what you would do when faced with an imminent and unlawful lethal threat. You should, of course, also decide what preparations you should make in advance, if any. Defense Training International wants to make sure that their students fully understand the physical, legal, psychological, and societal consequences of their actions or inactions.

It is our duty to make you aware of certain unpleasant physical realities intrinsic to the Planet Earth. Mr Farnam is happy to be your counselor and advisor. Visit: www.defense-training.com

27 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Viscount

How about the .257 Roberts? Quarter bore / 6.5mm. Fast accurate and the kick is mild.

Biker Bob

The problem isn’t the 5.56 it’s the pentagon trying to reinvent the wheel every few years. The 5.56 M193 was designed for and optimal in a 20″ bbl for velocity, accuracy and effectiveness. So reducing bbl.size would be going backwards but it continues to be done anyway and no matter how heavier a round they keep going to they will continue to fail at getting a more effective round. The Soviets designed their 5.45×39 based on the M193s devastating effectiveness.! A 5.56 round is most effective at 2600 fps and higher but in the 14″ bbl it’s only leaving at… Read more »

James Higginbotham

people can say what they want. but my first Battle Rifle was the M1 Garand in 30/06 and i have shot most of what Calibers the military has today. but you just can’t beat the 30/06 for killing power out to a thousand yards effectively if scoped. but battles take place a lot closer, and were talking about a Battle Rifle, not a SCOPED SNIPER RIFLE. my preferred round is the 30/06 but i also used the Remington 700 in 308 caliber and it was a SCOPED Rifle, and it was also a good load for a main line battle… Read more »

Buck Cassidy

My M16 nearly got myself and half my squad killed! For months I complained about the constant jams! Every 21 to 23 rounds, sure as the earth spins, jam- o- magic. Of course, it was me to blame. You’re not keeping your ammo clean! Funny thing, as much as we went through, most of my issue wasn’t over a month old! And I understand the damn thing still jams today!

Steven, Wasilla, Alaska

A new M16 cartridge that, I think, would be an ideal replacement for the US Military is called the 7 Raptor and is .284/7mm caliber. The developer of this cartridge is Mr. Arne Brennan, of North American Sportsman, LLC at 1324 W 22nd St., Houston, TX. 77008 contact phone number (713) 548-4687. Mr. Brennan is credited with developing the 6.5 Grendel, as well as other Raptor cartridges. He has a webpage dedicated to the 7 Raptor cartridge. He said on his website that he will allow the industry to use it as they see fit, so there are no preparatory… Read more »

Chris

.224! A necked down 243 or 308 case with a 65-75 grain bullet? I shoot A Remington 700 with 50-53 grain bullets it’s an amazing round