Australian Police Pay 10 Times To Going Rate For AR15 Rifles

Opinion

Do our police officers really need military-style automatic weapons?
Do our police officers really need military-style automatic weapons?

Australia – -(AmmoLand.com)- In a case of “you can’t have one, but I need one for my own protection”, police in the Australian state of Victoria are set to buy and fit 600 AR-15s for their patrol cars.

At a whopping $28,000 (US) per gun.

National Shooting Council spokesman, Peter Zabrdac, said the announcement that the government was going to spend AUD $25m (US $17m) to buy the guns is reportedly being done in the fight against terrorism and gun crime. That works out to AUD $41,000 or US $28,000 per gun.

Covering the acquisition with a veil of secrecy

“We all want our police to be armed and protected, but no-one can explain why the cost per firearm is ten times the going rate,” Mr Zabrdac said.

The acquisition will include five new mobile units, training and probably some additional storage, but attempts by our Council to find out how the money will be spent or whether the police will even go to tender are not available.

“Even when you take the additional costs into account, the government has not explained why the cost is so high, or who is going to profit from it,” he said.
An admission that Australian gun laws don’t work

Mr Zabrdac said the announced AUD$25m (US $17m) announcement also is a bad look for gun laws in Australia which do not permit citizens to own semi-automatic rifles, including AR-15s.

Terrorism attacks have been few and unsophisticated, and changes to Australia’s gun laws in 1996 had no effect on gun crime – so the acquisition cannot be explained by either of those two things.

“The only remaining possibility is that the police want them because they will enjoy the new look, even if it serves no real purpose” he said.

“In fact, it creates the risk of encouraging people to join the police force for the wrong reason. If Victorian’s needed that level of protection, we would be better off calling in the army”

“Unfortunately, the Victorian Government has a poor track record when it comes to managing the firearms portfolio. Only last year it brought in new laws aimed at targeting criminals without consulting anyone, with the result that they were successfully challenged by an alleged bikie.”

“The Victorian Government doesn’t understand the gun debate and has decided to throw millions of taxpayer dollars at an extravagance that has nothing to do with protecting the community,” he said.

Peter Zabrdac is the Vice President of the National Shooting Council – www.nationalshooting.org.au


Australian National Shooting Council

Australian National Shooting Council

The National Shooting Council is Australia’s peak political and lobbying group for shooters and shooting organizations who are sick and tired of the political attacks on what we do.

The Council is led by people with significant political experience from both sides of the political spectrum – and with track records showing what can be done when the right people come together. www.nationalshooting.org.au

30 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill

Terrorism my ass! They’ll use them on the people they just disarmed, who by the way they will label terrorists when they see what the gunmen has in store for them and even think about fighting back. I wouldn’t give a damn if they offered $100,000,000 each nobody should sell them a f*#%ing BB gun! Look at it. They tell everybody THEY cant have one and now all of a sudden they’re turning around and buying some for themselves? What a bunch of damn hypocrites!! Piss on those bastards. Yeah yeah I know, but it’s the police, the good guys.… Read more »

joefoam

Arm them with what they allow the general public to have. Maybe that will change the minds of the tyrants who rule AUS when the police forces decline to try and stop crime.

MICHAEL J

Why does Australia need weapons of war when they disarmed their citizens? Because they didn’t get the guns from the criminals. Yes, they’re that stupid. Maybe the cost of of these AR’s are so expensive because they failed to exempt themselves from the firearms taxes and background checks.

Grim

Just cancelled our trip to Australia and New Zealand.

S F

Since I see misinformation in comments below, Here’s the REAL deal on Army weapons. We RARELY use M-16s anymore ( even down to the guard level) pretty much across the board we use M4s, select fire (3 rd burst) is gone, 99% of the inventory has been converted to FULL auto.How do I know? I’m still serving.

Vern

Leftist politicians scamming the people and at the same time letting some of the weapons in that they don’t like in order for their own protection to be in place. They, like all politicians, don’t care about the people they are supposed to protect.
What would be their mindset if they found out those they arm with these weapons don’t like them and have other ideas about how and who to use them on? Corruption, is one deep hole that has no bottom.

Wild Bill

@noville, Lets assume that your insults are true, just for a moment, would you prefer intelligent useless scum? I think that for you that would be counter productive. OK the moment is over.

Wild Bill

Elected officials are the honest, hardworking, and brave men and women of law enforcement to force the population to submit to unconstitutional legislative acts. This is how freedom grabbers in all levels of government get their way.

james

Somebody making a killing on these sales.

Courageous Lion - Hear Me Roar - Jus Meum Tuebor

Boy, to be the company selling those! Talk about a profit margin! And at 28,000 per rifle that is MORE then 10x the going rate. I mean a really good AR shouldn’t cost more then what?$1000.00? And I don’t mean a pumped up over priced Daniel Defense, I mean something like a Ruger or Springfield Armory. Which means they are TWENTY EIGHT Times the going rate. Not 10 x. I mean who out there is selling AR’s BESIDES Daniel Defense for $2800?