WASHINGTON, D.C. –-(Ammoland.com)- The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) will possibly be unveiling the new rule dealing with unfinished frames and receivers tomorrow. Monday, April 4th, 2022.
The rule comes almost a year to the day that President Joe Biden directed the ATF to develop and implement new regulations surrounding privately manufactured firearms (PFM) and pistol stabilizing devices. He directed the ATF to have a proposed rule for PFMs within 30 days. He then gave the ATF 60 days to come up with regulations on pistol stabilizing devices.
The rule is expected to require the serialization of all frames and receivers before they can be sold or transferred by a business. Gun owners will not be required to serialize the frames currently in their possession. The rule affects dealers and manufacturers such as Polymer80 and JSD Supply. Unless the owner of a firearm built from a kit takes it into a gunsmith to have work done on the gun, they will not be required to serialize the gun.
It is expected that unserialized frames will still be able to be transferred without being serialized by individuals in states that do not have universal background checks. Any firearm built from a kit being transferred via an FFL will need to be serialized. Anytime an FFL takes a frame into their possession, the frame will need to be serialized
It is expected that the suppressor tubes (aka metal tubes) will now be treated as a receiver under the new rule. A modular suppressor will need each small section serialized, although it will require only a single tax stamp. This change will increase the cost of modular suppressors if it is even possible to serialize all sections.
Biden White House Block Extended Grace Periods
The ATF wanted a 90-day grace period until the new rule would officially go into effect. The Whitehouse pushed back, believing that the grace period was too long. It is thought the Whitehouse said it would settled for a 60-day grace period before the new rule goes into effect. It end will up being a 120 day grace period.
The President was under pressure from anti-gun groups that felt disappointed with the President’s lack of action against guns. As well as his failed attempt to nominate anti-gun advocate David Chipman to head the ATF. Due to heavy opposition, the President would withdraw his nomination of the Giffords employee.
New Leadership for ATF?
On Monday, Biden will nominate anti-gun advocate Steve Dettelbach to head the ATF. The failed Democrat candidate believes in banning so-called “assault weapons” and universal background checks. He has an A rating from multiple anti-gun groups.
The New Rules
The ATF submitted the proposed rule to the Federal Register for an open comment period where the public could respond. The ATF received nearly 300,000 comments from the public regarding the proposed rule. The vast majority of the public’s comments were in opposition to the proposed rule.
The new rule is believed to be 350 pages long. Many of the pages in the rule is the ATF responding to comments gathered during the comment period. The ATF has a duty to respond to many of the comments as possible. It is not known how many comments were not answered.
Gun rights advocates believe that the ATF is overstepping its authority. They believe the Bureau is creating new de facto federal law by abusing Chevron deference. This alleged abuse of authority is the same the agency used to ban bump stocks which led to the case currently being considered by the Supreme Court.
Until the ATF used Chevron deference to ban bump stocks, it was never applied to a criminal statute. When Chevron was decided, it was never meant to apply to criminal law. The ATF vastly expanded the scope of Chevron. If Gun Owners of America is successful in its case in front of the Supreme Court, it could mean that the new rule could be voided.
Biden will make the announcements at the Whitehouse surrounded by anti-gun advocates and anti-gun politicians. Failed pillow salesman David Hogg and anti-gun Senate Democrat Chris Murphy will both attend Monday’s event.
The rule will most certainly face legal challenges from gun groups. Gun Owners of America and Firearms Policy Coalition are already gearing up lawsuits. Other groups will most likely follow suit.
About John Crump
John is a NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. John has written about firearms, interviewed people of all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and can be followed on Twitter at @crumpyss, or at www.crumpy.com.
“A well regulated militia, being necessary to a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.” The second amendment, THE law of the land. Any free American citizen has the constitutional RIGHT and order to keep and bear arms, any arms, hand made, self made, military grade,weapons of war, aircraft, naval craft, ammunition and ordnance etc. This is true no matter what the baft says. If a man has no sword (the assault weapon of the day) he is to sell his cloak (his outer garment) and buy one. Luke 22:36 The… Read more »
Wonder why Crump hasn’t touched in the fact the rule creates an insane new definition for “readily” which completely changes the definition of machine gun, since per BATFE’s eff’d up thinking, anything “readily converted or restored” to a machine gun “is” a machine gun. And they use a court case in the new rule to define “readily” as an entire 8 hour workday in a fully functional and stocked machine shop. You can turn a 0% receiver and every semi-auto rifle and pistol into a machine gun in 8hrs with top of the line cnc machines and everything else in… Read more »
F the ATF, Joe Biden & Klan !!!!!!!
Biden will make the announcements at the Whitehouse surrounded by anti-gun advocates and anti-gun politicians. Failed pillow salesman David Hogg and anti-gun Senate Democrat Chris Murphy will both attend Monday’s event. Can we please stop hiding the brutal truth about those people? They cannot stand the fact that their power is limited by the Bill of Rights and the fact that we are allowed to have the hardware – the physical manifestation – of that limitation. However, those people aren’t ‘anti-gun’ by any stretch of the imagination. They LOVE guns, in THEIR hands. They just don’t want them in OUR hands,… Read more »
I would like Joe to send all American citizens some of those missiles he is sending to Uktlraine . We will need them when the civil war starts to deter the communist forces Joe is assembling in our military . The ATF will have fun trying to regulate the carnage that will result from the civil war they are pushing here in America . Let’s go Brandon #FJB and the ATF .
If the “new rules” have the effect of law (fines and imprisonment), then they are not “rules” but LAWS and Congress is the only constitutionally sanctioned entity that can make laws. BATF, EPA, USDA, etc. all create laws under the guise of and misnomer of regulations/rules through resulting in Administrative Law, which is unconstitutional. Some desk bound Federal agency bureaucrat administrator decides that he/she wants to advance their career and decides that some group or members of the public need to be restricted in their activities “for the good of the agency or nation”. They simply publish the new rule/regulation… Read more »
Alcohol is Legal, Tobacco is Legal, Firearms are Legal, Explosives are Legal.
“Crimes” involving any of the above can more than adequately be investigated by State Police and / or the FBI.
Defund and Disband this unnecessary behemoth of a taxpayer burden.
The 2nd Amendment is the ONLY right that is taxed and charged fees. The SCOTUS banned fees charged for voting by the Democrats as being unconstitutional but nobody has, as of yet, challenged the tax stamp or concealed weapons permit fees as being unconstitutional. This needs to be done.
When they decided to. And they will continue to do so until someone makes them stop. Some background: During oral arguments in US v Lopez, one of the justices asked the Solicitor General if there was any part of American life that Congress could not regulate via the Commerce Clause. Witnesses said some on the court were visibly shaken by his response that there was not. That might have been a factor when SCOTUS struck down the Gun Free School Zones act, supposedly the first time since 1937 that SCOTUS had limited Congress’ powers under that clause. Congress then turned… Read more »
Just because Joe says something does not make it so, I don’t know where he is getting all these numbers for guns showing up on crime scenes, they are not, so that leaves only one other reason for him saying that, SOMEONE IS LYING. Either Joe, or someone providing him with this lie. Also, Any person who is legally able to own and posses a firearm is allowed to make their own; for their own (the maker’s) personal use; not for sale; it does not require a serial number and is a protected right. Joe’s in for a rude awakening when the SCOTUS shoots… Read more »