Serious Rifles ~ Reliable Functioning vs. Meaningless Accuracy

Opinion

AR15-Black White iStock-534364755
IMG iStock-534364755

Modern Rifles: How “accurate?” What distance?

When I was graduating from Marine OCS in Quantico, VA, in 1968, nearly all our small-arms training was with the 1911 Pistol, M14 Rifle, and M60GPMG. Eugene Stoner’s AR was just coming into the System, and we were only able to shoot a few rounds through it during training.

Several weeks later, I found myself in Vietnam as an Infantry Officer, and there were no M14s around!

All my troopers had M16s (all shooting 55gr hardball), but I still carried a 1911, and the M60 was still in the System, although it did not enjoy a particularly good reputation.

We were told the “new” M16 was a 500m rifle, just like the M14.

That was fantasy!

“Effectiveness” of the 5.56×45 (223 Rem) hardball round was limited to 200m, although the vast majority of our engagements were within 100m. At that range, the 5.56 round took enemy combatants down without ceremony, and I saw very few get back up. All that, so long as the only substance between muzzle and skin was air! The uninterrupted 5.56 round tore up human tissue but didn’t shoot through things.

Federal Military Ammo M16
Federal Ammunition 7.62x51mm ammo. IMG Jim Grant

By contrast, 7.62×51 (308 Win) rounds from our M60s (when we could keep them running) went through and through people and most everything else.

Fifty-five years later, and on the other side of the World, students in my Urban Rifle Classes still bring ARs (now “M4s”), still chambered for 5.56×45, and still shooting 55gr hardball. And the foregoing ensemble represents a good choice for domestic personal protection.

As before, the 5.56 round still lacks range and penetration. But, for domestic personal defense, we don’t need a great deal of penetration. In fact, excessive penetration represents a disadvantage in most domestic deadly-force encounters.

And, the chances of our having a legitimate need to shoot a threatening person at a range of 200m during a domestic incident is some small fraction of one percent.

In my Urban Rifle Classes, most of our shooting is thus between point-blank and 50m. At 50m, I may still be able to make a persuasive argument that an armed antagonist represented an immediate, lethal threat to me and that I could clearly identify that he had a weapon and that he was threatening me with it.

At 100m range and beyond, it will be difficult indeed to make the same claim.

When the range facility we’re using permits it, my students may shoot at 100m, even 200m, so that students know and personally experience the full capability of their rifle. Yet, I still emphasize that having a legitimate need to shoot someone at those ranges is small, even when you’re confident you can.

I know that there is currently a dizzying array of rifle cartridges (SAAMI is “approving” more all the time) available to hunters, competitors, and recreational shooters, and the emphasis today is surely “long-range accuracy,” invariably from tight, temperamental rifles.

I see ads in outdoor magazines making the case that this caliber or that makes shooting big game, or paper targets, at 500m, maybe 800m., even 1100m, not only possible but all the rage.

Far be it from me to cast aspersions on those seeking to explore the limits of “academic accuracy,” yet when you can’t get any closer to an elk than 500m, you probably need to change guides rather than calibers.

I personally have no interest in competition and other non-serious uses of guns, although I have nothing unflattering to say about those who do.

For serious purposes, using military rifles at relatively close range (as described above), the practical difference between a 2MOA rifle and a 9MOA rifle is nil.

“Ballistic coefficient,” a term casually thrown about by modern competitors, is irrelevant within 300m.

Thus, those who exchange reliable functioning for meaningless accuracy do themselves no good service.

Our serious rifles are there to “impress” our enemies, not our friends!

/John


About John Farnam & Defense Training International, Inc

As a defensive weapons and tactics instructor, John Farnam will urge you, based on your beliefs, to make up your mind about what you would do when faced with an imminent lethal threat. You should, of course, also decide what preparations you should make in advance if any. Defense Training International wants to ensure that its students fully understand the physical, legal, psychological, and societal consequences of their actions or in-actions.

It is our duty to make you aware of certain unpleasant physical realities intrinsic to Planet Earth. Mr. Farnam is happy to be your counselor and advisor. Visit: www.defense-training.com

John Farnam
John Farnam
Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JIMEDD

I’m old school….i carry a 45 acp handgun with a hammer/external safety…..it’s a 1911, and i only carry fmj ammo…i also carry a 9 mm. It’s a Walther P 38, it has a hammer with decock capibility. Once again, only fmj ammo. I have not had a jam with fmj ammo…ultra reliable. nuf said. JimP.

Last edited 2 years ago by JIMEDD
Duane

It all depends on what one is trying to accomplish.

Trussman

Couldn’t agree more. I have a buddy that built a Gucci ar-15 and has trouble firing hard primers. he’s always bragging about how accurate his handloads are. I have a Geissele Super Duty that shoots anything that I feed it. The rifle is better than I am, if I’m being honest. Give me reliable any day over gnat’s-ass accurate. If I need something that accurate, I’m grabbing my Styer SSG69.

Ledesma

I was in 2 different platoons where our rifles were failing. And I’ll never forget it.

Roy

Most of what the Author says is true on the surface. But If I am closer than 50 meters I think that the only weapon is a Pistol that will take down with a single shot. Self defense is most important. I carry 24/7/365! This means that I am in contact with my weapon all the time. Following Murphy’s Law, the weapon is more of a threat to me and other innocents. than to any “Bad Guy”! So I think of Safety as the most vital function of the weapon I carry. This means that I refuse to carry any… Read more »

musicman44mag

You know, I understand advancement in arms but I am really leery of all the new calibers they are coming up with. My wife shoots a 243. It is a nice what I consider a medium cartridge and is pinpoint accurate at 300 yards which is the longest shot we have at our local range. Do I really need a Creedmoor or Grendel or anything else at 300 yards to take down a deer? I am still using brass from 1990’s though it is starting to get brittle, still using a 100 grain Hornaday boat tail and IMR 4064. Nothing… Read more »