Federal Appeals Court Strikes New York Firearms Signage Requirement

No Guns Yellow Sign NRA-ILA Shutterstock.com sign weapon b620918192
Shutterstock b620918192

A federal appeals court has struck down a New York state law requiring private property owners to post signs allowing concealed carry on property open to the public as part of a massive decision dealing with several separate challenges of the Empire State’s post-Bruen gun control legislation.

The Second Amendment Foundation was involved in two of the four cases decided by the court in its 261-page ruling. They are known as Hardaway v. Chiumento and Christian v. Chiumento. The cases were before the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Christian case challenged the signage requirement. The court noted that the regulated conduct—carrying a firearm for personal protection on private property—“falls within the Second Amendment right to carry.” Thus, the requirement to post signs allowing carry on private property open to the public was struck down. The restriction carried with it a criminal penalty of up to four years imprisonment and was graded as a Class E felony – which would strip the individual of their right to keep and bear arms in perpetuity.

The Hardaway case challenged a tenet of the law prohibiting carry in places of worship. The complaint became moot when the legislature changed the law after SAF sued to allow people such as plaintiff Jimmie Hardaway to carry in his church. In both cases, SAF was joined by the Firearms Policy Coalition.

There was another major win for gun rights in a case not involving SAF in the lengthy decision. The court struck down a requirement to allow government access to private social media accounts in order to apply for a carry license.

“Our challenges were narrowly constructed, allowing us to win a small but significant victory in the Christian case,” noted SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut. “Because the legislature changed the law after our lawsuit was filed in the Hardaway case, we consider that a victory as well.”

“These are just two more examples of SAF carrying out its mission to win firearms freedom, one lawsuit at a time,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb.


Second Amendment Foundation

The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 720,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.

Second Amendment Foundation

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kirbyjr

Why are there no repercussion for these state that continue to violate constitutional rights. Did not the Bruin decision clarify the method of determining constitutionality of laws concerning the 2A? There should be some consequence for failure to follow Supreme Court decisions. State legislatures should have to pay an extreme fine, all court cost, all attorney fees, etc. We need to make it very expensive for states to continue with these obvious unconstitutional laws. Currently it appears there are no consequences at all.

StLPro2A

All these frivolous cases merely drain the pro-gun coffers at no cost to the citizen funded anti-gun government tyrants. Need a law that any anti-gun law filed that gets ruled to be unconstitutional draws a $250,000/10 year federal time for all the sponsors for infringing upon We The Little Peeps constitutional rights.

CBW

Now all those people who made this law need to be immediately removed from public office for life and sent to prison for 5 years from violating every citizen’s Constitutional RIGHT. You know it’s true.

Colt

Karen lost in Kourt

Last edited 1 year ago by Colt