Open Letter to NRA’s Community of Competitive Shooters ~ NRA Past President, John C. Sigler

Opinion

NRA Past President John C. Sigler
NRA Past President John C. Sigler

This is an open letter addressed to NRA’s Community of Competitive Shooters. I write this letter because it is time to clear the air and move forward together to restore NRA’s leadership in the world of conventional competitive shooting and beyond.

NRA is strongest when its competitive shooting programs are healthy and strong. Competitive shooters are all strong Second Amendment activists.

When you think about it, we have more to lose than other gun owners. If we lose the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, not only do we lose the ability to defend ourselves, our homes, and our families, but we also lose our sport – which, in many cases, is a lifelong endeavor passed down from generation to generation.

Like many of you, I remember the days when the NRA was “The Leader” and “The Gold Standard” in competitive shooting. Not so much anymore.

Not that long ago a police competitor could go to the NRA’s National Police Shooting Championships at the old Highway Patrol Range in Jackson, Mississippi and expect to compete against 1,000 other competitors from throughout the United States and several foreign countries– not so now.

In the early 1990s, the NRA Nationals at Camp Perry saw four completely full ranges with 100 shooters per relay and three full relays – that’s 1,200 shooters – competing for the right to be named the NRA’s National Pistol Champion. Now, NRA is lucky to draw 100 shooters for its national Precision Pistol Championship event.

Not that long ago, the NRA’s Smallbore Program was the best-attended in the world, and the same was true for High Power Rifles “OTC” and Long Range—not so anymore.

More recently, NRA abandoned the Bianchi Cup Championship, giving it to CMP, and NRA Collegiate shooting is almost non-existent – all because the NRA Competitions Division has been gutted, stripped of funding, and stripped of personnel.

When I first joined the NRA Board of Directors, I was just one of almost three dozen active or recently retired NRA Competitive shooters on the Board. Now, there is less than a handful of competitive shooters on the board.

Why? What happened, and how did it happen?

Over the years, there has been a concerted effort on the part of “The Powers That Be” to purge the Board of competitive shooters. Why did that happen?

Some might argue that it is because times change, people change, and interests change—and maybe some of that is true—but that is not the whole truth or the real reason.

The reason those things happened is that those in charge of NRA at the time and up until now failed to understand who we, NRA’s competitive shooting community, really are or the vital role we play within the NRA. And because of that and against our repeated protestations, time and again, they took money from Competitions and used that money and those assets for other things not of our choosing, and not always wisely.

They failed to understand the simple truth that NRA competitive shooters are the solid backbone of NRA and that it is the competitive shooting community that makes the rest of NRA happen – and that includes the political side of NRA at NRA-ILA.

Those people – most of whom are now gone, thank God – failed to understand that we of the competitive shooting community are the same people who run the NRA clubs, we run the ranges, and we are the instructors who bring new shooters safely into the NRA Family.

When NRA-ILA needs volunteers to attend rallies, make phone calls, knock on doors, hand out literature, work the gun shows, help with campaigns, testify at legislative hearings, and work the polls on Election Day, it is the competitive shooters who give up their precious time with their families, their precious time on the range, and take time off from work (usually without pay) to fight for our precious Right to Keep and Bear Arms – while others sit back and reap the benefits of our hard work.

We know all of this to be true – but for many years, the so-called “Powers-That-Be” at NRAHQ either did not know, did not care, or simply took us for granted.

During my six years in The Chairs, and especially during my two years as NRA’s 59th President from 2007 to 2009, I advocated for stronger support for competitive shooting and for our military and veteran members, many of whom were—or wanted to become—competitive shooters. In the process, I advocated for strengthening and supporting our system of clubs and associations. I even created a new Endowment—the Competitive Shooting Endowment.

That all went away when I left The Chairs, and I was left as a sometimes-lone voice crying in the wilderness, fighting for a cause that was easy to ignore and hard to replace.

When “The-Powers-That-Be” needed money for other things, they took it from the Competitions Division – and they did it year after year after year. This is not a new phenomenon; it has been going on for at least the past ten years and probably more.

We complained – I complained – but the louder we complained, the further back we were pushed, the more we were ignored and isolated, and the more of us were “removed” from the Board.
Not that long ago NRA’s Competitions Division boasted a robust and knowledgeable staff. Any competitor could call NRAHQ and talk to a person in the Competitions Division who not only knew the NRA Rules but was an accomplished expert in the same discipline as the caller with the question – not anymore.

It is no secret. Those of us who have been fighting this war from the “inside” have known for years that Wayne LaPierre was no friend to competitive shooting and no friend to the competitive shooter, and neither were most of his closest staff. But Wayne is no longer with us, and neither are many of the others who brought us to this point.

Now, there is good news! There is a light at the end of the tunnel. It is a new day at NRA – or so it seems.

The new Board officers, Bob Barr, Bill Bachenberg, and Mark Vaughan, are all friends of competitive shooting. Our new Executive Vice President, Doug Hamlin, tells us he has made rebuilding NRA’s Competitive Shooting Division a high priority.

These new officers seem to understand that the NRA must rebuild its clubs – clubs that are in most cases run by competitive shooters. They seem to understand that NRA’s education and training activities must be rebuilt and reinvigorated and that in most cases it is the competitive shooters who will fulfill that obligation.

These new officers know that NRA-ILA and NRA’s Grassroots Division are at the heart of NRA’s political power in defense of the Second Amendment. They also understand that NRA’s competitive shooting community is the backbone and the key to that grassroots effort and success.

The prior administration gutted NRA Competitions and, in the process, hurt NRA badly. It appears that this new administration and the new Board officers understand that if NRA is to recover and rebuild, the first step is for NRA to return to its roots and rebuild and revitalize NRA Competitions, to treat NRA competitors with the respect we have earned and deserve, and to give all NRA members a good solid reason to recruit other new members.

It seems to be a new day at the NRA – let us hope and pray that it continues.


John C. Sigler

Mr. John C. Sigler is Chair of NRA’s F-Class High Power Rifle Committee. John was a member of the United States F-Class (Open) Rifle Teams that won the 2023 World Championship (Gold Medal) in South Africa and the Third Place Bronze Medal at the 2017 World Championships in Canada. Mr. Sigler holds NRA Distinguished International Rifleman Badge #67.

Read Related: Former NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre Has Cost the Gun Rights Movement North Of A Billion Dollars

49 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jaque

I dont think the NRA is salvagable. As a life member I feel cheated by the organization and forgiveness wont come easy if ever from me. I have yet to be convinced the NRA can regenerate itself to the days of past greatness.

Darkman

So far a lot of cheap words and begging for forgiveness. In time if the new leadership at the NRA shows they truly have changed the culture and direction of the organization. Then and only then I will look again at contributing my hard earned $$$ to the organization. Until that time I will continue to support the GOA, AFA, and the Iowa Firearms Coalition,

nrringlee

Destroying an organization is easy. Rebuilding an organization is hard. I look back at my experience as a young career Marine after a tour in the Southeast Asian War Games (2d Place) and trying to rebuild the Marine Corps after that disaster. It took two decades of dedicated effort and by the way, a lot of peacetime casualties to get the job done. NRA needs to be willing to bleed itself of the poison. We shall be watching.

Nick

If this guy really thought WLP was as bad as he states here, then why was it, until just a couple years ago, WLP was ALWAYS rehired UNANIMOUSLY by the BOARD?… Barr and Hamlin are more concerned with paying Bill Brewer than fixing the NRA. The two VP’s occasionally make a little internal noise, but don’t actually do anything. Now the “reform” movement, it seems, at least Journey who is on the board, and Tait, who was on the board, and is running now, both want us to donate to the NRA-PVF. That’s nuts. Take a look at the bottom… Read more »

Whatstheuseanyway

The NRA seems to be a ghost of it’s formers self, a self inflicted wound of a thousand cuts. A little here, a little there, no one will notice…
I became a member because the first gun club I belonged to required it. The one I’m in now, much larger, doesn’t.
I’ve enjoyed the mags but they’ve become redundant and I can get the same info from other sources.
My membership expires early next year and that will be it.

Novice.but.learning

John Sigler offers us a view into the relatively recent past. More importantly, John offers us a positive, doable path to restore a very important asset that motivates strong 2A activism that benefits all who believe in personal defense. His vision is broad based. At it’s root John offers a pathway for nurturing new generations of competent and safe shooters and gun owners. Every yearI visit half dozen or more gun shows in my travels around the US. Very seldom do I miss seeing volunteers who explain the benefits of the NRA and their belief in the organization’s current and… Read more »

Last edited 11 months ago by Novice.but.learning
Montana454Casull

When the NRA chose to bank role crooks instead of competitive shooters they singed thier own death certificate.

Wild Wild West

Mr. Sigler, you are going to have to completely clean the Comp Div house if you expect high power rifle to show any improvement. I am a Benefactor member of NRA and very nearly resigned my membership after the debacle that was Camp Atterbury this year. Only the fact that I have to maintain NRA membership to belong to my local club kept me from doing so. When the stud duck of Comp Div says “bullseye” sports are dying and there is no fixing it, when some competitors are allowed exceptions to the rules, when team awards listed in the… Read more »

Nick

Sigler, gonna give us an answer as to why you didn’t vote at the meeting about the proposed dissolution of the SLC?…

Nick

Sigler, if you care as much as you claim about the NRA why didn’t you vote?
https://nraindanger.wordpress.com/2024/09/22/vote-to-disestablish-the-special-litigation-committee/