Opinion
The 2024 elections brought significant changes to the political landscape, with Republicans taking control of the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives.
This shift has created a unique opportunity to push forward a legislative agenda that champions constitutional values, including the right to keep and bear arms. One piece of legislation at the forefront of this movement is Rep. Thomas Massie’s National Constitutional Carry Act (H.R. 9534), which aims to ensure that Americans can exercise their Second Amendment rights without interference from state or local restrictions.
What Is the National Constitutional Carry Act?
National Constitutional Carry Act (H.R. 9534), is a bold proposal to eliminate the patchwork of state laws that currently dictate where and how law-abiding citizens can carry firearms. Under this bill, states and localities would no longer be able to impose criminal or civil penalties on eligible individuals carrying firearms in public. The Act also invalidates existing regulations that penalize lawful gun owners for exercising their right to self-defense. This legislation ensures that the right to bear arms, as guaranteed by the Second and Fourteenth Amendments, is applied uniformly across all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and U.S. territories.
This bold bill seeks to end the patchwork of restrictive state and local gun laws, ensuring that all Americans can exercise their Second Amendment rights consistently across the country. Let’s break down what’s at stake.
What the Bill Does
H.R. 9534 guarantees the right to carry firearms nationwide by:
- Eliminating penalties: Prohibits states and localities from imposing criminal or civil penalties on law-abiding individuals carrying firearms in public.
- Overturning restrictive laws: Invalidates existing regulations that penalize lawful carry.
- Covering all U.S. territories: Ensures uniform rights across states, D.C., Puerto Rico, and other territories.
As Rep. Massie explains, “No one should have to beg the government to exercise a constitutionally protected right anywhere in the country.”
Key Data Points
- 29 states already allow constitutional carry. Despite fears from gun control advocates, these states have not devolved into chaos. In fact:
- A study in Ohio showed reduced gun-related crime in six cities after adopting constitutional carry.
- Gun control strongholds like California and Illinois continue to face staggering violence, contradicting claims that stricter gun laws ensure safety.
Hunter King of the National Association for Gun Rights emphasizes: Twenty-nine states have proven [gun control advocates] wrong. Crime rates remain stable or even decline under constitutional carry laws.
Why It’s Important
Supporters argue that this bill isn’t just about gun rights—it’s about reaffirming fundamental freedoms. The legislation:
- Removes barriers for law-abiding citizens to defend themselves and their families.
- Simplifies the legal landscape for gun owners traveling across state lines.
- Sends a message that the federal government stands with constitutional rights over bureaucratic overreach.
Patrick Parsons of the American Firearms Association notes, “For the past 15 years, anti-gun liberals have told everyone that states passing constitutional carry would experience violence like we haven’t seen since the ‘wild west’ days. Twenty-nine states have proven them wrong, all while gun-control strongholds like DC, Chicago, and California have descended into violence and deadly chaos.”
Challenges on the Horizon
While the stars seem aligned for gun rights advocates, obstacles remain:
- Senate supermajority: Republicans lack the numbers to override a filibuster, making bipartisan support crucial.
- Opposition from anti-gun groups: Expect loud resistance from organizations that paint constitutional carry as reckless.
- Presidential Veto? With Trump as President? I don’t think so. So not an issue this time, but future legislative efforts will hinge on maintaining political control.
The Current Landscape
Currently, 29 states have adopted constitutional carry laws, allowing residents to carry firearms without a government-issued permit. These states have proven that empowering citizens to exercise their Second Amendment rights does not lead to chaos or increased crime. In fact, a recent Ohio study found that gun-related crime decreased in several cities after constitutional carry was implemented.
In contrast, gun control strongholds like Chicago, Washington D.C., and California continue to grapple with high rates of violence, undermining the argument that strict gun laws lead to safer communities. H.R. 9534 aims to bring the benefits of constitutional carry to all Americans, regardless of where they live.
Live Inventory Price Checker
|
Crossbreed Reckoning Holster for Hellcat w/ E Series, IWB/OWB, Right-Handed | Viridian Weapon Technologies | $ 79.00 |
|
|
Crossbreed Reckoning Holster for Hellcat w/ E Series, IWB/OWB, Left-Handed | Viridian Weapon Technologies | $ 79.00 |
|
|
CrossBreed Holsters Reckoning IWB/OWB Holster, Sig Sauer P320 Carry, Right Handed, Black | Shooters Choice | $ 76.95 |
|
|
CrossBreed Holsters Reckoning IWB/OWB Holster, Sig Sauer 365, Right Handed, Black | Shooters Choice | $ 76.95 $ 69.99 |
|
Opposition to National Constitutional Carry: Concerns and Claims
Critics of the National Constitutional Carry Act argue that the legislation would compromise public safety and undermine states’ rights. They highlight the wide variation in state standards for concealed carry, with many states requiring safety training, live-fire experience, and stricter eligibility checks. Federalizing constitutional carry would, opponents claim, force states with rigorous standards to accept permits—or lack thereof—from states with minimal or no requirements. According to Everytown for Gun Safety, “Visitors could carry concealed firearms—even if they’ve recently been convicted of violent crimes or never received safety training.”
Public safety concerns are central to the opposition. Many states with permitless carry laws do not require safety training or proficiency testing, and some lack safeguards to prevent individuals with violent or abusive histories from carrying firearms. For example, only 23 states require safety training, and just 17 require live-fire experience. Fearful critics scream this lack of uniformity could lead to increased gun-related accidents and violence, as well as the erosion of local control over firearm regulation.
Opponents advocate for maintaining state-level autonomy and suggest national training and safety standards as an alternative. They believe that stricter eligibility criteria, such as barring individuals with histories of domestic abuse or violent crimes, would better protect public safety. For them, the National Constitutional Carry Act represents a dangerous overreach that prioritizes individual rights over the collective security of communities.
The Road Ahead
With a Republican-controlled Congress and a conservative-leaning Supreme Court, the prospects for passing national constitutional carry legislation have never been brighter. However, challenges remain. Even with GOP majorities in both chambers, achieving a supermajority in the Senate to overcome a filibuster will be difficult. Furthermore, the legislative process requires careful coordination and robust public support to counter inevitable opposition from anti-gun advocacy groups and Democratic lawmakers.
If passed, this legislation could mark a transformative moment for Second Amendment rights in the United States. It would ensure that citizens no longer have to “beg the government” for permission to exercise their constitutionally protected freedoms—a sentiment echoed by Rep. Massie and supported by prominent gun rights organizations.
Why It Matters
The National Constitutional Carry Act isn’t just about firearms; it’s about Second Amendment freedom. It’s about affirming that the government should not place undue burdens on citizens exercising their inalienable rights. A unified national standard for constitutional carry would simplify the legal landscape for gun owners, reduce the risk of accidental violations, and bolster public safety by deterring crime through responsible firearm ownership.
As the Republican majority begins its term, this legislation represents a critical opportunity to restore and protect Americans’ rights. The stakes are high, but the rewards—a safer, freer America—are worth the fight.
About Tred Law
Tred Law is your everyday patriot with a deep love for this country and a no-compromise approach to the Second Amendment. He does not write articles for Ammoland every week, but when he does write, it is usually about liberals Fing with his right to keep and bear arms.
Already legal. As of 1783 when the US Constitution was ratified which included the SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED Amendment.
“Critics of the National Constitutional Carry Act argue that the legislation would compromise public safety and undermine states’ rights.”
The states have zero rights to block or impede or impinge upon any US Constitutional right. Period. They don’t do it to any of the others.
If they want to “Codify” our “God Given/Natural Born” right, fine. The fact is the US Constitution recognizes our right to bear arms. State rights do not apply. There are no limitations on the 2nd Amendment. Look up the definition of SHALL. The 10th Amendment does not apply. State law has no standing. Municipal edicts have no standing. The only reason it is even debated is because of current and previous, weak politicians. We get what we vote for.
I want to be a fly on the wall when senator Chuck “Mr Gun Control” Schumer lives to see his whole career comes crashing down, with the passage and signing of Concealed Carry Reciprocity.
There should not be any laws against the 2A in the first place. What ever happened to, “Shall not be infringed”?
The people who sponsored, wrote, enforce or judge unconstitutional law should be jailed under the laws against treason and tyranny. When this is done we will actually have freedom.
Arm up and carry on
This sounds great on the surface. But, what the Fed giveth, the Fed can taketh away!! I live in MO, I doubt anti’s will be able to repeal our carry laws.
Also anti gun states be able to make shooting standards impossible? Here, when CCW was being considered. Perposels for shooting tests that pros would have trouble with.
“Is the USA on the Cusp of Passing National Constitutional Carry?” No, probably not. While this bill would be a HUGE step in the right direction, there wuld still be restrictions on carry. The ban on carrying in federal buildings is a big one that comes to mind. “29 states already allow constitutional carry.” No, they do not. There are exactly zero states with constitutional carry. The constitution enumerates your absolute right to bear arms. Currently, EVERY state still has restrictions on the bearing of arms. While the majority of states have some form of “permitless” carry, either openly and/or… Read more »
Man if this dream could come true this would end all the BS that we go through to be able to protect ourselves. I was hoping that reciprocity would finally make it but this would be the end all to finally shut the gun control groups down and then all they would have is abortion in their back pocket and would do major damage to their party. For me, measure 114 requiring me to have a permit to buy a gun would be gone, having to a carry permit in my state would be gone, having to have multiple carry… Read more »
Constitutional Carry I will say it again the constitution already guarantee’s this right to all law abiding Americans. It is those Americans have elected past and present that have abused this guarantee on the federal and state level. It seems law makers can adjust the law using a unbalanced system that they themselves have created. Yesterday the senate Chuck “Shammer ” was stopped in the conformation process of liberal rainbow judges some 200 have been confirmed since the election. Senator Thune today said that that process will now be slowed to a crawl as each new democratic appointee will have… Read more »
Every gun owner should lobby on behalf of a national safety training law that ensures that everyone – prospective concealed carriers or no – understands gun safety, the law, individual responsibility, and in particular, effective gun handling and marksmanship, as a government/private-provided support system on behalf of constitutional carry. Perhaps the most important aspect of doing so – i.e. the net result, above and beyond the government’s expressed acknowledgement of the right to bear arms in no uncertain terms – would be the vast increase in recreational shooters that would result, cementing in place an unassailable buttress of firearms freedom –… Read more »