The survey has ended. Click here and subscribe to get notifications of the results.
In the small town of Kennesaw, Georgia, an ordinance from the 1980s compels every head of household to possess a firearm and ammunition, a measure that underscores a commitment to self-defense and community safety. This law not only reflects Kennesaw’s deep-seated values but also serves as a crime deterrent, with locals and officials noting its significant impact on keeping potential criminals at bay.
The essence of Kennesaw’s charm, from its bustling local businesses like Honeysuckle Biscuits & Bakery to the neighborly exchange of hand-written notes, is complemented by a robust stance on gun rights. “It’s not a symbolic law. I’m not into things just for show.” insists Mayor Derek Easterling, emphasizing that the law is a practical measure to ensure residents can protect themselves and their property. The prevailing belief among the community is that the mere knowledge that every home could be armed makes criminals think twice before committing crimes here. In 2023, this approach appears to be effective, as the town reported no murders and maintains a reputation for being a safe place to live.
The law includes sensible exemptions for those unable to own guns due to mental or physical disabilities, past felony convictions, or religious beliefs.
Yet, it remains a source of both pride and contention within the community. For some, like Blake Weatherby, the law symbolizes a proactive stance on personal safety. ”
It’s the attitude behind the guns here in Kennesaw that keep the gun crimes down, not just the guns themselves,” he explains, suggesting that it’s the community’s spirit of self-reliance and protection that enhances safety.
Despite mixed feelings among some residents who worry about the town’s reputation, the principle of armed self-defense has undeniably integrated into Kennesaw’s social fabric, influencing how the community is perceived and operates.
Kennesaw is not alone in its approach. Similar laws have been enacted in other American towns like Gun Barrel City, Texas; Nelson, Georgia; and Virgin, Utah, each adopting the mandate as a statement of freedom and a deterrent to crime. These towns have seen how such policies can foster a culture of responsibility and safety, echoing Kennesaw’s experiences.
As America’s support continues to coalesce around gun rights and safety, Kennesaw serves as a compelling model. The town’s approach offers a blueprint for how combining legal mandates with community values can potentially reduce crime and enhance public safety. Perhaps it’s time for more American towns to consider this proactive measure, not only to safeguard their residents but also to reinforce the fundamental right to self-defense, ensuring that criminals are well aware that the community is not defenseless.
wow! what a contrast to the no firearms allowed harpies.
what would happen if those who do not follow the law and don’t have a firearm in the home are prosecuted? the progs would be apoplectic. they would be immediate litigation to have this law repealed. but why, hoplophobia?
this is the difference between people who love freedom and ones that want to control other peoples lives.
All Gun Laws Restricting Guns Are Unconstitutional! “Shall Not Be Infringed”!
I have been a life member of the NRA for over 60 years and I strongly support the 2nd amendment.
I do not believe that you have the right to prevent me from owning a firearm.
For the same reasons, I do not believe that you have the right to force me to own a firearm.
It is my freedom as an American to decide.
I have felt for a long time. At least, basic training for all. (this would provide training. Maybe weed out those that are careless.)
Then a credit/allowance to purchase a firearm. Then yearly allowance to pay for ammo/range fees.
I understand your point and agree with personal choice. That said, I view these “mandatory gun ownership” laws as more symbolic than anything. They rightfully provide exceptions for religious reasons, convicted felons, people with mental health issues, etc. If you don’t want to have a gun, just pick one. The easiest would likely be religious reasons. If I didn’t care about having a gun, I could make a good case for mental instability and have fun doing it. Plus, I don’t believe one of these ordinances has ever been enforced. As I seem to recall, the Kennesaw ordinance was a… Read more »
There is a 1793 law the Requires every Citizen to Own and Maintain a Firearm!
Right on, now you’re talking. Someone or a town with common sense. I love it. I guess Georgia aint such a bad place to live. I have a friend that keeps begging me to move there telling me the 195,000 for a 4 acre property could get me 10 acres with a 2,500 Sq FT home on top of the mountain for my ham radio for the same price.
Hummmmmm!!!!!!!
Yes, it is our personal Right to obtain, keep, and bear a firearm, but the Congress, inconjuction with the POTUS, does have the authority and power to issue us a weapon and have us participate in the military forces of the United States.
Our Constitution guarantees me the RIGHT to keep and bear arms. It does NOT provide me the MANDATE to keep and bear.
Individual liberty is essential.. that is, to keep and bear, or not to. Anytime fedGov, or even state or local, MANDATE anything, they are out o line.
Reread the exceptions provided for under this law. Reasonable and proper.
I own several firearms and carry a handgun every day. But I don’t want the government telling me that I have to. The same would go for mandatory voting or mandatory church attendance.