UnitedHealthcare CEO’s Tragic Death: How Long Until Biased Media Target Suppressors? ~ VIDEO

Opinion
Editor’s Note: There is no official confirmation that what we are seeing is an actual silencer.

The shocking and tragic shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in midtown Manhattan with what appears to be a handgun with a silencer [unconfirmed] is making headlines.

While law enforcement works tirelessly to apprehend the perpetrator, it’s likely only a matter of time before anti-gun organizations and media outlets seize this incident to call for new bans—this time, on firearm suppressors.

Suppressors, also known as silencers, are already tightly regulated under the National Firearms Act (NFA), requiring extensive background checks, federal approval, and steep tax payments before purchase. Despite these regulations, anti-gun politicians and groups like Everytown for Gun Safety are likely to use this tragedy to push legislation like the HEAR Act, which seeks to ban suppressors entirely.

UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Shooter with Silencer ScreenShot 10-4-2024
UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Shooter with a handgun and what looks to be a Silencer. ScreenShot 10-4-2024

What Do Suppressors Actually Do?

Contrary to Hollywood’s portrayal, suppressors don’t make guns “whisper quiet.” A suppressor reduces the noise of a gunshot by about 20–35 decibels—similar to the protection provided by earmuffs or earplugs. This is an important distinction because their primary use is for hearing protection and safer shooting experiences, especially for hunters, sports shooters, and law-abiding gun owners.

Suppressors can also mitigate recoil and muzzle flinch, helping shooters improve accuracy and ensure ethical, well-placed shots while hunting. Far from being tools for criminals, they’re vital safety devices in many recreational and professional shooting environments.

Debunking Common Claims

The most common argument against suppressors is that they allow shooters to commit crimes undetected. However, there’s little evidence to support this claim:

  1. Suppressors Aren’t Silent: Even with a suppressor, most firearms are still as loud as a jackhammer. In the Virginia Beach shooting cited by suppressor opponents, survivors described the sound as similar to a nail gun—not silent by any stretch.
  2. Criminals Rarely Use Suppressors: According to data from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), registered suppressors are rarely used in crimes. Criminals prefer unregulated, easily concealed weapons—not suppressors that leave a paper trail.
  3. Public Safety Devices: Suppressors actually help reduce noise complaints near shooting ranges and hunting grounds, promoting better relationships between firearm enthusiasts and their communities.

The Real Target: Responsible Gun Owners

Suppressor bans, like many gun control proposals, disproportionately affect law-abiding citizens while doing little to curb crime. The misnamed HEAR Act, championed by figures like convicted Felon Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ) and Congresswoman Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), proposes to ban these devices outright, framing them as tools for mass shooters.

But the reality is different: suppressors are safety devices with legitimate, lawful applications.

For example, the Virginia Beach shooting and other incidents are tragic but rare cases. Most suppressor owners use them for legal purposes, such as reducing hearing damage or improving shooting accuracy. Blanket bans on suppressors would punish millions of responsible gun owners for the actions of a few criminals—who likely bypass the law anyway.

Why We Need Rational Debate

Before jumping on the bandwagon of trending bans, it’s essential to ask: will this legislation actually prevent crime, or is it just another symbolic attack on the Second Amendment? Suppressors are already tightly regulated, and criminals who intend harm won’t be deterred by additional restrictions. Banning suppressors will only harm the millions of Americans who responsibly own and use these tools.

Let’s not allow this tragedy to become a scapegoat for misguided policy proposals. Instead, focus on enforcing existing laws and addressing real solutions to violent crime. It’s time to stop punishing law-abiding citizens for the actions of criminals.

Does a Suppressed Pistol Sound like a Nail Gun?


About Tred Law

Tred Law is your everyday patriot with a deep love for this country and a no-compromise approach to the Second Amendment. He does not write articles for Ammoland every week, but when he does write, it is usually about liberals Fing with his right to keep and bear arms.

98 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Roland T. Gunner

I dunno; my money is on a disposessed stockholder.

Roland T. Gunner

Operation MK Ultra; alive and well in these United States and furthering the Marxist political agenda since 1959.

Matt in Oklahoma

I thought the lib green media would be happy. He didn’t noise pollute and he escaped on a e-bike so…

Montana454Casull

Time for these blue States to reinstate the death penalty and rid society of evil people who commit evil acts of violence against unsuspecting people and murder them . It’s called consequences for their evil actions and it saves tax payer money in the end .

J Gibbons

….But, but, but, it’s illegal to carry a firearm in NYC or even own a suppressor anywhere in NY state. This whole story must be misinformation…..

Yet another example of where infringements do not reduce crime. Disarming the law abiding public actually increases crime, as has been demonstrated time and time again in the cesspools that are today’s Democrat-run cities.

Nick

Big time CEO gets shot in NYC… I wonder random, or targeted? Who did he piss off…
Interesting timing of the video being released just after that ENT group comes out with that statement on suppressors being a health device…

1 2 3 4