Republican Elected Officials Aim to Ban Gun Registry

Personal Data Gun Registration Paperwork Privacy iStock-solarseven 1048264146.jpg
Personal Data Gun Registration Paperwork Privacy iStock-solarseven 1048264146

On Jan. 16, 2025, Rep. Michael Cloud (R-TX) and Sen. Jim Risch (R-ID) put forward legislation to stop the formation of any federal gun registry. The legislation in question, the “No Retaining Every Gun In a System That Restricts Your Rights Act,” is designed to reverse abuses from the preceding Biden administration’s ATF policies. 

According to a 2022 report by the Washington Free Beacon, the ATF gathered information of close to 1 billion firearms purchases made by lawful Americans. When this controversy surfaced, Cloud launched an investigation on the ATF’s record collection and warned that then-President Joe Biden could use this massive compilation of data to set up a firearms registration system. 

Such a move would be in violation of federal law, the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act (FOPA) of 1986, which explicitly prohibits the creation of a federal gun registration system. However, Biden’s ATF was hellbent on bypassing the US Congress and granting the ATF the power to run a database of over 920 million firearms records and even spy on firearms owners.

Biden’s presidency was infamously marked by the ATF’s “zero tolerance” policy, wherein it forced countless firearms to close owing to gun dealers making simple paperwork errors. The upshot was that the ATF would receive these records and could continue to grow its database. 

Cloud has observed that when a Federal Firearms Licensee’s (FFL) records arrive at the ATF they “are stored indefinitely in the [the agency’s] Out-of-Business Records Imaging System (OBRIS) database, laying the groundwork for a federal gun registry.” This alarming power grab prompted Cloud and Risch to introduce the “No REGISTRY Rights Act.”

The act would compel the ATF to erase its current records and stop the future collection of records. The Act tackles these issues head-on by: 

  • Requiring the ATF to delete all existing firearm transaction records, dismantling the current database.
  • Allowing FFLs to destroy transaction records when they go out of business, preventing further accumulation by the ATF,
  • Prohibiting any federal agency from creating or maintaining a firearms registry in the future.

Rep. Cloud stated, “The Second Amendment is a cornerstone of individual liberty, and no administration — Republican or Democrat — should have the ability to compile a list of law-abiding gun owners. The Biden Administration’s backdoor attempts to create a federal firearms registry are a clear threat to Americans’ privacy and constitutional freedoms. The No REGISTRY Rights Act will dismantle the ATF’s existing database and ensure such a registry can never be implemented.”

Sen. Risch stated, “The ATF’s excessive overreach has gone unchecked for too long. Idaho’s law-abiding gun owners should not be subject to an already illegal federal firearms registry. The Second Amendment is not conditional to a list of guns in circulation and their owners. All law-abiding Americans have the undeniable right to keep and bear arms. My No Registry Rights Act will safeguard this essential liberty for generations to come.”

As long as the federal government is allowed to regulate gun ownership in the United States, the possibility of gun controllers establishing a federal gun registration system remains high. 

Pro-Second Amendment organizations have long argued that a system of gun registration would pave the way for future anti-gun administrations to pursue outright gun confiscation. 

Thus far, well over four dozen legislators have co-sponsored this bill. 

Passing this bill would be a good first step in undermining the unconstitutional NICS system and other attempts to undermine the Second Amendment through bureaucratic actions. With a Republican trifecta in DC, gun owners can shake things up by passing this legislation. 

However, nothing is set in stone in politics. Moreover, Republicans have a long history of dragging their feet on these key issues. A strong dose of external pressure will be needed to make Cloud’s bill a legislative reality. 


About José Niño

José Niño is a freelance writer based in Austin, Texas. You can contact him via Facebook and X/Twitter. Subscribe to his Substack newsletter by visiting “Jose Nino Unfiltered” on Substack.com.

José Niño

30 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Norm

Without criminal penalties, it’s another toothless law the ATF can ignore. Time to sic DOGE on the ATF.

Last edited 7 months ago by Norm
swmft

law is already there, there is no way to enforce it, and no criminal penalties for violating it , the agents should be fired with cause and treated like dishonorable discharge no pension no rehire even as a janitor

Boz

I have zero tolerance for leftists and atf.

KDad

This is long overdue. I hope it passes.

Nick2.0

Does anyone expect the ATF to delete everything? The government always has backup copies of everything.
Further, with NICS, even without access to the 4473, they still will know who’s buying guns.
By the way the NRA promised none of this would happen in the ’90s… Ooops.

Get rid of the 4473’s. Get rid of NICS. Get rid of permits to purchase and permits to carry. Murder and all other mayhem are already illegal. Ban gun laws.

Context Warrior

I fully support this legislation. It has, however, no teeth. It’s already illegal to have a federal firearms registry. However, federal employees in the ATF and other agencies have set up what amounts to be an illegal federal firearms registry. This elicits a big yawn from those who are culpable. That will stop only when there are two provisions: 1) making it a felony to direct or participate in anything that could be reasonably construed to be a firearms registry; and 2) making it a felony for failing to report when known or should have known any function that could… Read more »

Jerry C.

Another pointless bill. Current law already makes the ATF’s actions under the Biden administration illegal. Instead of passing a redundant law, simply apply the existing one and prosecute the former director of the BATFE for his willful violations.

Akai

How many anti 2A RINO’s are there in Congress? Too many is the answer.

DarthDoug

Who comes up with the names for these bills?

Exactly what I want to put on a bumper sticker. It really rolls off the tongue, don’t it?

Opsec58

You mean the registry that doesn’t exist?