Outrage: WA Governor Signs Permit-to-Purchase Bill, Lawsuits Certain

Democrat Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson has signed legislation requiring a permit-to-purchase a firearm in the Evergreen State beginning in May 2027. It turns a constitutional right into a government-regulated privilege, say opponents. (Spoof image; Not a Real Document).

Washington Democrat Gov. Bob Ferguson on Tuesday signed House Bill 1163, which will require all future gun buyers to obtain a permit to purchase firearms after it takes effect in May 2027, but the announcement already has Evergreen State gun owners furious as the gun prohibition lobby cheers.

Alan Gottlieb, founder and executive vice president of the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) said, “Our legal team is already working on potential challenges.”

“Fortunately,” Gottlieb noted, “the law doesn’t take effect until May 2027, which gives us plenty of time.”

Between now and then, the statute will undoubtedly be carefully dissected to determine the best legal strategy. Nothing needs to happen overnight.

Former Washington state Senator Lynda Wilson commented on social media, “Today, one of our most fundamental and inalienable rights has been demoted to the status of a privilege—subject to permission, payment, and government approval.

“The right to keep and bear arms—the right that secures all others—has now been reduced to something you must apply for, pay for, and qualify for, under criteria determined by the very government it is meant to restrain,” she added. “Rights that require permission are not rights at all. They are privileges—and privileges can be revoked.”

According to a report at KING 5 News, the Seattle-based NBC affiliate, “A permit to purchase a firearm may be revoked if the permit holder commits any act or becomes subject to a condition that would have prevented the issuance of the permit in the first place.”

Veteran Second Amendment advocate Jane Milhans posted on the anti-gun-rights Alliance for Gun Responsibility’s Facebook page, “Celebrating taking away a woman’s right to protect herself and making her an unarmed, unprotected, defenseless target for criminals, abusers and those who attack women.”

Ferguson, who is closely allied with the Seattle-based Alliance for Gun Responsibility—the billionaire-backed gun prohibition lobbying group—was surrounded by representatives from that organization. The Alliance Facebook post claims, “Washington is continuing to be a national leader in the gun violence prevention movement.”

But recent headlines say otherwise. According to Washington State Homicide, a popular site on “X,” so far this year, Seattle has seen a dozen homicides, including three this past weekend. Tacoma has logged 11, and Federal Way—located in between—has posted six killings. Overall, Washington has recorded 91 murders so far this year.

Over at the Washington 2025 Legislative Action Group’s page, veteran gun rights advocate and firearms retailer Daniel Mitchell declared, “See ya in court!” Mitchell is founder of the Washington Civil Rights Association, and during testimony earlier this year against HB 1163, he famously promised the Senate Law & Justice Committee, “F— Around and Find Out.” Mitchell vowed to be the “first person to challenge this in federal court.”

Mitchell, a member of the SAF Board of Directors, said via private message, “Democrat legislators in the state of Washington, followed Everytown for Gun Safety, lobbyists legislative agenda to the letter. They passed an unconstitutional permit to purchase, that will result in excessive delays and costs to the citizens of Washington…This will be challenged in court, and we will win as the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has already struck down aspects of Hawaii’s permit to purchase scheme.”

Mitchell is also proprietor of Sporting Systems, a large southwest Washington firearms retailer. On Tuesday, the store posted this statement:

“We have some time, May 1, 2027 is a long ways off. The team is evaluating case law in the 9th circuit and the best way to stop the law cold.

“Second, we will do everything we can to bring a free class to the market. No right shall be converted to a privilege and a fee associated with that right. That’s a Supreme court statement from 1960. We will hang our hats on that.

“We will not stand by and watch companies try profit off the passage of an unconstitutional law.

“Even more so, if those same companies did nothing to fight the passage of the bill. This won’t make us popular in many circles, but we don’t care. Not trying to make industry friends, just trying to protect your 2A rights.”

Expected to line up against the measure when legal action is taken are such organizations as SAF, CCRKBA, the National Rifle Association, Gun Owners of America, National Association for Gun Rights and local groups.

Critics say the new law will effectively turn a constitutionally protected right into a government-regulated privilege. The argument will likely center on the Second Amendment and Article I, Section 24 of the state constitution. Both provisions specifically protect a right to keep and bear arms, and rights do not require government permission before they can be exercised, gun rights activists insist.

Pushback: Activists Want Relief from NFA; More Demands for Bondi to Act

Grassley, Ernst Demand Answers and Action in Alleged ATF ‘Waste, Fraud, Abuse’


About Dave Workman

Dave Workman is a senior editor at TheGunMag.com and Liberty Park Press, author of multiple books on the Right to Keep & Bear Arms, and formerly an NRA-certified firearms instructor.

Dave Workman

Subscribe
Notify of
44 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Arizona

This unconstitutional law won’t stop a single violent criminal, and those corrupt politicians know it, or they’re imbeciles. Free men don’t ask permission, and won’t abide by this farce of a so-called law. “If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.”  Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262 (1969) ALSO… “It is settled by a long line of recent decisions of this Court that an ordinance which, like this one, makes the peaceful enjoyment of freedoms which the Constitution guarantees contingent upon… Read more »

Thought Criminal

We can’t be armed for what They have planned for us.

Akai

If The People wont stand up to such BS, the unconstitutional BS, then just be ready to bend over and take it. It’s clearly unconstitutional. The anti crowd will continue to use the corrupt courts because they know it takes many months if not years to go through the courts, and SCOTUS doesnt always take up such cases.

Bigfootbob

I heard a video clip from Governor Sideshow Bob stating something to the effect, “the voters of Washington have spoken, this bill will help make Washington a gun free state.” Can you imagine that? This is what happens when a state loses voter integrity. Washington went to all mail in ballots 20 years ago and today there are zero statewide elected Republicans and the state is controlled by 3 or 4 counties out of the 39 counties that make up Washington. There’s only 2 options for change I can see, move to a free state, which some people cannot do… Read more »

Tionico

so fergie got his firs wish, and early on. He is SO HAPPY to have done to all of us what he did to Baronelle Stutzman. He is an abusive tyrant of he worst order.

If Washington do not return to in-person voting and cleanup of the twisted voter rolls, we are no longer a free state but a slave state. This new “bill” is vivid and living proof.

Boz

The only gun “law” that pertains to me is the 2nd Amendment in the Bill of Rights. l wiII ignore aII others.