Gun-Control Lobby Threatens Ruger to Pull RXM Pistol — Without a Single Crime Involving It

Ruger RXM 9mm Pistol Handgun Right

Ruger’s RXM pistol is now in Everytown’s crosshairs — and the fight looks like it could set the tone for how manufacturers and courts treat gun design going forward.

Everytown for Gun Safety’s legal arm sent a blunt letter to Ruger’s general counsel on November 3, urging the company to pull the RXM from the market or redesign its internal trigger system.

The group argues the RXM shares the same kind of internal trigger geometry that, at least in their opinion, has allowed small conversion devices — often called “Glock switches” or auto sears — to turn some semi-automatic pistols into illegal fully automatic weapons.

“Ruger faces a choice following Glock’s recent announcement,” Everytown’s chief litigation counsel Eric Tirschwell wrote, urging Ruger to “put public safety first.”

Why this matters now: Glock recently said it would discontinue many of its longstanding models, a move Everytown celebrated as a victory for its legal and legislative campaign. With Glock stepping back, Everytown is telling Ruger it doesn’t want the RXM to become “the new crime gun of choice” simply because it uses a similar internal layout. The letter points to a dramatic rise in recoveries of conversion devices nationwide and notes a string of civil suits brought by cities and states against Glock over similar concerns.

Ruger has not publicly answered Everytown’s demand.

That silence leaves a few obvious questions for customers and the industry:

  • Will Ruger change its production model because of outside pressure?
  • Will courts extend liability to makers for third-party illegal conversions?
  • And what will happen to owners and sellers if a design becomes legally disfavored?

From the firearms community’s side, the reaction is predictable and skeptical.

Many defenders of gun rights see this as an effort to impose design-based de facto bans or to force manufacturers into costly redesigns under threat of litigation. Critics point out that conversion devices are already illegal to possess or use — and that similar aftermarket or criminal modifications exist for many platforms, including AR-style rifles — so blaming the factory design alone feels like an overreach.

The letter itself admits Everytown is not yet aware of any modified RXM pistol being recovered in a crime, but insists that it’s “almost certainly only a matter of time.”

Legally, the scene is complicated. Plaintiffs in lawsuits against Glock have persuaded some judges that their claims should survive early dismissal, and several states have even moved to ban pistols defined by specific internal parts. Those developments are precisely what Everytown points to as leverage: if courts or legislatures accept the theory that “ease of convertibility” creates liability or grounds for bans, then other models could be next. The RXM’s fate could become a test case for whether design liability can be used to shape which pistols stay on store shelves.

For Ruger customers, the practical worries are real, but the immediate fallout is unclear. If Ruger caved and redesigned the RXM, what would happen to owners who already bought one? Would aftermarket parts and rosters be affected? Would retailers and state rosters react? History shows manufacturers sometimes adjust designs to meet regulatory pressure or liability risk, but they also risk alienating buyers if changes look like capitulation to anti-gun groups.

Everytown’s letter isn’t about safety — it’s about spin.

The group is pushing a political narrative that blames lawful manufacturers for the criminal misuse of illegal conversion devices already banned under federal law. It ignores reality: millions of responsible gun owners safely use these same designs every day without issue, and nearly every firearm platform on the market can be illegally modified if someone breaks the law. Instead of targeting criminals, Everytown targets the companies and citizens who follow the rules, weaponizing fear and misinformation to pressure manufacturers into surrendering to an agenda that has nothing to do with “public safety” — and everything to do with control.

Bottom line: This represents a fresh escalation in a multifront lawfare strategy that combines litigation, state lawmaking, and public pressure. If Ruger resists, and they should, expect Everytown and allied attorneys general or cities to intensify lawsuits or legislative efforts; if Ruger complies and alters the RXM, the industry will closely monitor the precedent and potential consumer backlash.

Either way, owners and dealers should keep an eye on developments — because a design fight that starts in court or PR can quickly ripple into buying rules, state rosters, and how manufacturers build handguns for the next decade.

(Reporting note: the Everytown letter to Ruger, dated November 3, 2025, is the primary source for this story and is embedded below )

Everytown for Gun Safety Demand Ruger Recall its RXM Handgun


We are in dangerous times! We are SO CLOSE to our final funding goals! With your help we can make it!

GLOCK Launches New “V Series” Pistols

Some of the links on this page are affiliate links, meaning at no additional cost to you, Ammoland will earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase.
Subscribe
Notify of
27 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
HumblePatriot

Wait, did the gun-control lobby just sell me on the RXM?

This is why Glock never should have bowed the knee. They’re coming for every product of every company, no matter what! Makes me spittin’ angry that evil people are allowed to intimidate firearms companies into compromise!

Toxic Deplorable Racist SAH

How does Ruger tell Everytown to back off?
“No crime(s) have been committed with our gun, therefore you have no standing. We say again, NO STANDING. So STFU and go back under the rock you crawled out from. If you persist and continue down this litigious path, we will countersue for lawyer and court costs. How deep are your pockets?”

Mayor of Montvale

Virginia residents better get ’em while they’re hot. With the Nov. 4 2025 elections, the governor’s office, other state offices, and both houses of its legislature are suddenly overwhelmingly BLUE. They have promised many gun restrictions, and no doubt they will be getting right on that.

OldJarhead03

The truth is, it’s “almost certainly only a matter of time” until the gun grabbers file more lawsuits. REGARDLESS OF WHAT ANYONE DOES.
Screw ’em. Molon Labe!

DIYinSTL

Nice business you have here. Be a shame if it accidentally burned down.

Have there always been a subset of lawyers as evil as those who work for Everytown? It is no wonder that William Shakespeare in the 1590s wrote “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.”

Tionico

Glad my sidearm is an antique no on anyone’s radar. I’ll bet Nobody’s Town don’t even know my personal choice exists. Is also old enough here is no way they could get it out o the marketplace. It already is…. “obsolete” I don’t care. It suits me well, they are not in demand thus cheap. are rugged and reliable and well proven over decades.

gregs

Has anyone been charged with covering that Ruger into a machine gun in the article?
We have moved into the age of fiction, minority report era, where practice is being practiced by authoritarians.
Wish glock hadn’t and that ruger wont.

Tionico

so Glock caved and everysicktown now have a bone in their teeth to remake the entire industry. Next, they’ll be demanding remote control o our guns. Prior to use, we will have to send a ten digit code to Everytown and sometime in the next couple hours, once you are well dead by that criminal, they MIGHT grant you permission to use your weapon to stop the now-completed attack.

Everytown need to get their wings clipped, big time.

Silver Creek

After reading this article, I got to wonder, everytown for gun safety claims the Ruger can be converted to full auto, how would this gun banning group know this? Did they hire gunsmiths to rework the pistols to fire full auto? If do, then that is illegal and why aren’t they charged? This is just another way for the gun banning groups to sideswipe laws and get various semi auto handguns banned. Leaving only revolvers and single shots. But then the gun banning groups will want to ban revolvers calling them “Saturday night specials” giving nicknames to guns. Notice that… Read more »

Last edited 1 month ago by Silver Creek
Dr. Strangelove

What about The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act? Shouldn’t this prevent lawsuits?