Opinion
The inch was seemingly given, so it is not surprising to see pursuit of the mile.
Gun ban advocates are emboldened by their perceived victories in firearm production changes, and Ruger is the latest target on a list that won’t end until the firearm prohibition lobby decides what guns are allowed to be sold or courts step in to enforce the law.
Earlier this month, Everytown for Gun Safety, along with Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, formally demanded that Sturm, Ruger & Co. cease production of their new RXM pistol, stating that “Ruger must pull the RXM from the market unless and until it changes the pistol’s design.”
In his letter, Attorney General Tong references Glock’s recent announcement that they will discontinue various handgun models before asserting that Ruger, under Connecticut law, “must enact reasonable controls to prevent the sale or distribution of legal firearms that can easily be converted to illegal firearms.” He then demands “a statement from Ruger as to what it intends to do with the RXM,” followed by a lengthy list of documents, records, and financial information that Ruger must “preserve for future production.”
As of press time, Ruger had not responded, and the RXM is still being offered for sale.
It is telling that Everytown and Attorney General Tong see the bad guys in this scenario as the companies that are “involved in the sale or distribution of legal firearms,” rather than the criminals who violate existing federal (and often state) laws that prevent the manufacture or possession of machine guns or of parts designed and intended to convert a legal firearm into a machine gun. Guns can be illegally modified in any number of ways, including by simply shortening barrels or stocks with hacksaws. They can also be stolen and used to commit illegal acts. Should firearm prohibitionists succeed in dictating design standards to inhibit illegal “convertibility,” they will simply move on to demanding guns that incorporate technology to discourage theft or unauthorized discharge. Indeed, they are already doing so in some cases.
Whether firearms are discontinued from production due to corporate strategy, user demand, technological advancements, or anti-gun legislation and lawsuits, the headlines will claim victory from the anti-gun side, and the anti-gun lobby will consider the move a mandate and a roadmap to the next target.
This latest demand on Ruger is a case in point, combining anti-gun legislation and coordinated action by both private gun ban groups and anti-gun state officials. As we have reported, several jurisdictions sued Glock over its supposed “design flaws,” which in effect are that its gun are not impervious to criminal modification. Then California essentially banned the sale of Glocks in one of the nation’s largest markets by legislation, prompting litigation by NRA and others.
Live Inventory Price Checker
|
|
Ruger RXM 4" 9mm 15rd Pistol, FDE - 19418 | Palmetto State Armory | $ 529.00 |
|
|
|
Ruger RXM 4" 9mm 15rd O.R. Pistol w/ Threaded Barrel and RMR/RMSc/DeltaPoint Pro Footprint - 19412 | Palmetto State Armory | $ 502.99 $ 452.99 |
|
|
|
Ruger RXM 4.5" 9mm TB (2)15rd Pistol, FDE - 19439 | Palmetto State Armory | $ 580.00 $ 499.00 |
|
|
|
Ruger RXM 4" 9mm (2)15rd Pistol, Pink Champagne - 19400-PINK | Palmetto State Armory | $ 469.99 $ 439.99 |
|
Meanwhile, just this year, Connecticut enacted the so-called Firearms Industry Responsibility Act (FIRA), empowering the state attorney general to bring civil enforcement actions against gun manufacturers that sell products “designed in a manner that is reasonably foreseeable to promote conversion of a legal firearm into an illegal firearm.” Violations can result in not only punitive damages and injunctive relief, but courts can impose penalties up to $5,000 per violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act. This, they say, makes the RXM illegal, even though they cannot point to a single violent crime committed with an illegally modified RXM.
No less a gun banner than Joe Biden had declared during his term in the White House that “If I get one thing on my list—the Lord came down and said, ‘Joe, you get one of these’—give me that one….” That one wish was to repeal the Protection of Lawful in Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), a critical federal law that protects against frivolous lawsuits meant to disrupt and bankrupt the firearms industry. And while thankfully this “one thing” was not bestowed upon Joe, his White House Office of Gun Violence made undermining the law a priority, including by promoting legally dubious legislation such as FIRA in the states. As we have explained, such legislation makes compliance with the law a constantly shifting target for gun industry members, with anti-gun enforcement officials moving the bullseye case-by-case.
In all this, they are abetted by activist lower courts, which – despite this year’s U.S. Supreme Court opinion affirming and reinforcing the PLCAA’s protections – create loopholes that effectively turn the law on its head.
As even liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson correctly observed, the PLCAA stands for the proposition that it is the legislatures (bound by the Second Amendment), not anti-gun activists, that determine what guns are legal for sale. Yet another case misinterpreting the PLCAA emerged from a federal court in Connecticut just last week.
Anti-gun extremists are not sending these demand letters with a goal of public safety but to seize control of the firearms industry through administrative action and lawfare. While it is unclear what the next steps are for Glock, Ruger and others, what is clear for NRA is that preservation and support of the PLCAA is critical. Protective state legislation remains a priority, as are ongoing efforts to protect and regain pro-gun legislative majorities in Congress and the states.
One thing is for sure. Firearm prohibitionists aren’t waiting for the Almighty to intervene on their behalf. Rather, they intend to bedevil the gun industry through their own efforts, no matter how many laws and real criminals they have to ignore in the process.
About NRA-ILA:
Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess, and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit: www.nra.org
We are in dangerous times! We are SO CLOSE to our final funding goals! With your help we can make it!
Gun-Control Lobby Threatens Ruger to Pull RXM Pistol — Without a Single Crime Involving It
Gun and ammunition companies should end all sales and contracts with these communist states.
Companies that don’t should be boycotted harshly by everyone else.
Those that do should be rewarded by us purchasing their products not the commie sympathizers products.
Sure it would hurt sales and their bottom line initially but that’s better than being put out of business.
Or the Supreme Court could just declare the 2A means what is says.
Neither will happen but I had to say it.
Other than a single shot break action,
An open bolt sub machinegun, has the fewest moving parts,
and is the simplest of all firearms to manufacture, from scratch, with minimal skill and tools.
Any magazine fed firearm, including, bolt, lever, and pump action can be converted to full auto, not just self loading models.
Those who have the irrational fear of firearms lack the mental capacity to
comprehend the simplest of facts.
Note to Ammoland. Tina Kotex governess of OreGONEistan signed a bill that went into effect immediately that all bumpstocks, trigger devices and where guns can and cannot be carried. How about addressing that? Governor Kotek signs gun bill that bans rapid-fire devices, clarifies where firearms can, can’t be carried – KTVZ Instant felons. What is not discussed is that it is a felony to sell your device in or out of state and that they must be destroyed or turned into the LEA and no longer kept is possession. I hope the response from Oregonians is that of NY when… Read more »
You reap what you sow. I am, of course, referring to Bill Ruger’s famous statement, “No honest man needs more than 10 rounds in any gun,” and his letter to Congress urging them to restrict magazine capacity to 15 rounds. This was during the Clinton presidency (1989), so younger readers might not even be aware of it; but I’ll never forget. So excuse me if I don’t shed a tear for Ruger. They make nice guns, and they used to be relatively affordable, but a company that kowtows to the government like that (or like Smith & Wesson did) will… Read more »
Perhaps President Trump could have the DOJ present a monthly
assessment on these Ammoland comments. As a learning experiment
in how citizens view their rights. As opposed to how these many fiefdoms
ignore the constitution outright, in their attempt to subjugate our nation.
There is a multi-generational treason afoot, which must be recognized
sooner rather than too late.