New York’s ammunition background check law isn’t about safety—it’s about control. From endless delays to invasive data collection, this system treats every law-abiding gun owner like a criminal in waiting, all while ignoring the Constitution.
The reality is plain: Tens of millions of well-armed Americans with a capacity to be very dangerous remain the single most formidable obstacle to tyranny. Those who wish to dismantle the Republic know this. That is why every major push…
The failure of the Court to act is not neutrality—it is bowing to tyranny. Masked under slogans like “strong gun laws reduce violence,” the real outcome is disarming…
Not just another court case—it’s a test of whether the U.S. Supreme Court will defend your God-given right to self-defense or sit back while states like New York trample it.
The Supreme Court’s refusal to grant certiorari in several important 2nd Amendment cases, Antonyuk in particular, is more than disappointing — it’s dangerous.
Was Bruen, the landmark decision that reaffirmed the Second Amendment’s core protections just two years ago, gutted—not by a new ruling, but by silence? A shrug. A refusal to act.
Gun Owners of America (GOA) filed a reply brief with the United States Supreme Court in Antonyuk v. James (Antonyuk v. Hochul).
These cases represent a decisive moment—one that could either fortify the High Court’s previous rulings in Heller, McDonald, and Bruen, or allow state governments to continue their relentless assault on the right to keep and bear arms.
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed its decision in Antonyuk v. James (a/k/a Antonyuk v. Nigreli), which challenged New York State’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act (CCIA).