Today is Wednesday, October 22, 2014rss RSS feed
License To Mow

Relating Firearms To Cars Is A Misplaced Argument

Concealed by Mary Dynk McDonald

Concealed by Mary Dynk McDonald

USA --( Many rationalizations for legislative controls on firearms begins with “Well, you have to have a license to drive a car, you should have a license to own or buy a gun.”

This does have some valid reasoning, but the justifications are flawed and, for the most part, unrealistic.

Driving a car involves a great deal of knowledge of traffic laws as well as “common sense” laws, known routinely as Rules of the Road. Wait! There’s that favorite term routinely thrown around when discussing firearms – common sense, as in common sense legislation. Rules of the Road have a counterbalance in the firearms industry – Four Rules of Firearms Safety. No legislation required in either instance, just common knowledge and training that can be obtained anywhere.

Traffic laws are complex and lengthy. Driver’s education is something we’d like all our teenagers to take, something many never get when they live in a congested city serviced by mass transit. Yet many bypass the classroom education, obtaining a driver’s license by studying the book and taking the test, somehow managing to find behind-the-wheel experience through friends or family. In contrast, many children raised in rural communities learn to drive as soon as they can sit on the edge of the seat and reach the pedals. These same children are taught how to drive safely, helping with farming and ranching duties, as well as how to handle a firearm safely, using it to hunt game and defend the home.

There is no licensing requirement for children to operate a vehicle on private property, nor to use a firearm on said property.

Public outrage at the number of tickets and accidents caused by untrained drivers is seldom seen or heard, yet traffic accidents kill far more individuals annually than firearms accidents. Driver education is supported on multiple levels while firearms training is discouraged, almost forbidden. We are routinely subjected to public address announcements for safety issues involving cars, lawnmowers, digging a hole, cutting a tree limb, etc., but nothing for firearm safety.

Then there are the negligent homicides caused by driving under the influence, especially for repeat offenders. While many may lose their license, oftentimes losing their vehicles as well, they still seem to find a car to drive to get that next drink or fix. Legislation or license revocation does not stop those who have a need or a desire to obtain alcohol or medication to relieve a physical or psychological need.

Questionnaire completion is not required at the time a vehicle is sold, further ensuring the person who will be driving has no history of driving under the influence. A license may be required to purchase alcohol or controlled substances, but only to verify age. However, there is no need for the retailer to ask if the purchaser has plans to drive a vehicle after consuming alcohol or medication. An individual with a desire to obtain a vehicle while driving under the influence will find a way to obtain said instrument, legally or illegally. Even if it means driving the riding lawnmower down the road to the liquor store or bar, the alcoholic will find a way to get that next drink. Likewise, an individual intent on threatening others or committing a crime will find a way to obtain a firearm.

But riding lawnmowers are not licensed. Neither are golf carts, dirt bikes, ATV’s, backhoes, farm tractors, or large dirt moving trucks used in mines and gravel pits. Yet all can be driven down the road, legally or illegally, with or without licensing by the driver. All serve a unique purpose, yet guidelines or legislation regarding each vehicle cannot be applied to all vehicles in their entirety. Handguns, shotguns, and rifles are all firearms, yet each has its own purpose. Legislation that restricts the purchase or owning of all firearms without regard to use or purpose is ill-conceived and detrimental to citizens at the individual level and the firearms industry as a whole.

Which leads to the [misguided] theory of requiring each firearm to be registered, or for individuals to be licensed to sell, purchase or own a firearm. Relating this to vehicles, the argument reverts back to the riding lawnmower analogy. Each of the items has a serial number, something that is most notably used when selling an item to a pawn shop or when reporting the loss or theft of an item to the police. There is no national database for reporting ownership of these items, nor is there a requirement for licensing to be able to sell these items to another individual. No requirement to obtain insurance for operating it on your own property, or when helping a neighbor to handle their high grass. No requirement for business owners to obtain licensing or insurance to operate a lawn maintenance company. Recommended, but not required.

Lawnmower Straw Purchase

Businesses routinely purchase vehicles for use by the owner or family member. No questions are asked if this vehicle will be operated by someone whose license has been revoked. No revocation of a business’ license based on negligent or intoxicated driving by the owner or a family member. While the insurance company may determine the owner’s actions are deserving of policy cancellation, there is no legislation or public protest decrying this. Nor are there limits placed or questions asked in regards to selling a vehicle to an individual with a history of driving under the influence.

Equating the need for licensing firearms or firearms owners to the legislative requirements of use and licensing of vehicles is used too often. Yet this justification is without merit, the reasoning for licensing a lopsided argument.

(Editors note: Driving is a Privilege, Owning a gun is a Right.)

About Mary “Dynk” McDonald
Mary “Dynk” McDonald is the author of “Concealed” and the “Heartstrings Legacy” series of books. At this time, Concealed is the only novel about women’s con-cealed carry. A Girls, God, and Guns story, it is the embodiment of the strength of the Second Amendment. Concealed is available in paperback as well as in ebook formats for Kindle and Kobo readers. Heartstrings Legacy — Choices Made is available on Kindle. The next book in the series is in edit.

  • 10 User comments to “Relating Firearms To Cars Is A Misplaced Argument”

    1. HBHTEX on May 28, 2014 at 10:45 PM said:

      When is I was 19 a neighbor kid was moving his hard barefoot and ran over his foot ! (true story) I was the one that took this kid to the hospital along with his mother. He enden up losing 3 toes. Would this be considered lawn mower violence ? In the Santa Barbara,CA. tragedy you don’t hear the liberals screaming about “knife violence” 3 kids were murdered with knives. You don’t hear the liberals screaming about “automobile violence” 12 or 13 kids were hit by this sick scums car intentionally. Then the gungrabbers blame the NRA ! Get ready, here we go again ! But I’m ready this time,I’ve got enough ammo to last the rest of my life,even if I shoot alot, which I do !

    2. Chuck on May 29, 2014 at 6:42 AM said:

      Our country was founded on guns, not cars. It was called the Revolution. Save you ammo for the next one and don’t waste it on paper. You are going to need it.

    3. Ceapea on May 29, 2014 at 8:20 AM said:

      Funny how they want to register guns “just like cars”. But then the left’s inconsistencies and double standards show up. How is it that the car is not at fault when a drunk driver kills a whole family, but the gun is at fault when a deranged killer shoots several people.

      Seems to me that the “operator” in both instances would be at fault. Not the “machine”!

    4. brian winters on May 29, 2014 at 10:15 AM said:

      Some of your information is not correct regarding nj automobile laws. I sold vehicles in NJ and you cannot purchase a vehicle in your name without a valid nj drivers license. You have to have a drivers license to have a vehicle registered in your name so you cannot purchase one without being able to register it. This applies to street legal motorcycles as well.

    5. Kevin McGonigal on May 29, 2014 at 11:51 AM said:

      One does not need a drivers license to purchase a car, just to drive it on public roads. One does not need to register a car purchase (as in a person who simply collects vintage cars)unless the vehicle is going to be driven on the highways. So the next time you hear that argument tell the facts. No license to simply purchase a car and no registration simply to own one.

    6. Fundamentally, the flaw is this: Driving a car is not Constitutionally protected.

      Is there a better analogy to guns then cars? Yes: printers. Our use of printers is protected by the First Amendment. They need to be reloaded with both paper and ink or toner. Today’s printers, in the hands of a private citizen can produce more pages than the printers of the late 18th century. And the Framers of the Constitution could not have imagined the leaps of technology that would enable such a powerful communications tool to be so inexpensive and be able to sit on a person’s desk.

    7. kitchawan kid on May 29, 2014 at 5:17 PM said:

      I can drive my car anywhere in the US. can I carry my firearm anywhere in the US?

    8. Elect Me on May 29, 2014 at 6:56 PM said:

      In my opinion we have the right to move freely about this great nation. Driving my not be a constitutionally protected right, however, it is with all the BS laws that are out there that do involve driving they are stepping all over the constitution. The DMV is a revenue machine for this corrupt government. What part of the second amendment don’t they understand? “Being necessary for a free state”, or “shall not infringed”. Either way we all are screwed.

    9. Captain america on May 29, 2014 at 11:03 PM said:

      This comparison holds no water any sense common or other if analyzed away from the gun grabbers drivel! owning(keeping )a firearm for any reason is a constitutionally guaranteed RIGHT, driving a car is much lower as a privligethus the reason for a license. I don’t see these commie leaning(progressives) calling for someone to be licensed to plead the fifth at trail, or exercise their first amendment free speech right. Or any other constitutionally guaranteed rights. Whys that??? Here’s my guess, the aim is really to register all firearms their owners and locations for later confiscation. Another illegal act under the constitution. Think about it !!! Anytime a devilcrat says we need more common sense gun laws in the U.S. He is only talking about restricting , infringing you 2nd amendment rights!!the laws they talk about always only effect law abiding citizens Their ultimate goal is complete disarming of all civilian citizens so that only the ruling “party” has the guns therefore the power to keep the peons down!! Never ever trust a devilcrat and don’t forget never ever vote for one either!!!!!! Their agenda is ruin America and Americans along with our freedoms. I wouldn’t even vote for one to be dog catcher!! Never ever trust them for their true colors are red,red,red, as in commie. We still have our votes thank god! use it wiselyit !!!

    10. on May 30, 2014 at 7:21 AM said:

      Driving a vehicle on a public road is a privilege.
      Keeping and bearing arms is a right, and one does not get or need a license to exercise a right!

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Bob McKenna: “home visits” my (fill in your own anatomical part here), these are Rambo type invasions....
      • freewill: MR. Matti Morro. I think Clinton put a stop to that back in the late 90’s, they’ll either leave...
      • scott: Glad to see others carrying the flag and moving it forward, in lieu of a court decision.
      • RDNK: I don’t think the little black muslim boy has been blamed for nothing in 6 years. At least they’ve...
      • tenringrob: Leave the body there. The wolves will clean it up. FBI gets its job done for it, wolves get a free meal....
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

      • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    Copyright 2014 Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Win a Russian Sniper Rifle From

    Subscribe and receive our emails , the drawing will be November 20 , 2014 maybe you will be the lucky shooter receiving a Russian 1891/30 PU 7.62x54R Mosin Nagant Sniper Rifle and a can of Ammunition. For more information visit the AimSurplus Sniper Rifle Promotion Page.
    Monthly email subscription from Ammoland