By Fred Riehl
Manasquan, NJ –-(Ammoland.com)- Among those who do not support Obama but are fearful of Romney, I see a lot of chest-thumping about how you are beating the evil republican or communist incumbent, by supporting a third party, Libertarian, or Green Party candidate.
The truth is a third-party candidate has ZERO chance of winning, that is just the cold hard facts and it has nothing to do with if they are a better choice, which they may be, but no amount of wishing on your part can change that. They do not have enough money, they do not have enough organization and, really, no one knows who they are. So they stand no chance of winning.
Ron Paul (still a candidate for GOP party nomination but always with the option to run as an independent), is the one exception to the paragraph above, he knows this fact, and is a good example of someone picking the lessor of two evils. He knows that he can not win and that is why he has dialed back his campaign and allowed his support to subtly, fall behind Romney, HE KNOWS HE WOULD ONLY SPLIT THE VOTE. (Que the Paul Bots; Hardcore supporters will dispute this, but a tip of his hand is the curent pole on his web site titled “What Should Ron Paul Do Now?” this is Paul letting his supporters down easy as he moves away from splitting the vote.)
So what to do? You have three options, vote for Obama and doom us for sure, vote for your current third party favorite, which is a vote for no one, based on the facts above – you might as well stay home and not vote or vote outright for Obama – because your vote will have no effect on getting someone different elected.
Last is to vote for the Republican candidate, at least this way, we can pool our vote to make a change that moves away from Obama’s flawed view of America.
“Yeah but I can’t stand the Republican choice!” you say. Â Do you oppose him that much more than Obama? Ask yourself if the values of the GOP candidate are closer to my beliefs than Obama’s, or can I find some stand on the issues that I share with Romney that I can vote for him even if he is not my first, or even second, choice. The logical answer would be Yes!
“The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.” ~ SPOCK, Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan
Keep supporting your Third-Party Candidate, but in the privacy of the voting booth, think hard and put your vote where it can make a difference. Then work to get your candidate more money, more visibility, and more support for the next election and make your change then.
This election is too important to leave to the “chance” that someone better might win! Our current President is a “Clear and Present Danger” and steps need to be taken to stop his re-election – FIRST. Then work for real change after the bleeding has stopped.
Ask yourself are you All In in 2012?
About Fredy Riehl:
Fredy is the founder and editor of AmmoLand Shooting Sports News and a certified “Gun Nut”.
@karl
So, you would prefer another eight years of this nonsense rather than four? Additionally, you would prefer that these policies are implemented by a Republican party President, thus damaging the entire Republican party, as well as conservative goals across the board?
I know that I went to public school here, so bear with me, as I may be missing something obvious. This being said, four more years of disastrous Presidential policy, under a President known to have these tendencies, sounds more appealing than eight years of these policies under a President that is supposedly in our corner.
Bully Jim Fixit! That's the whole dung ball right there folks.
@Joe ~ because we hate Obama more!
Romeny ~ Paul 2012 Vote YES!
Just to reiterate here: Obama and Romney are essentially the same candidate. Romney, arguably, is even worse for the country than Obama, because he is the exact same politician, but wearing Republican colors. Not only will he continue Obama's path of destruction, he will destroy any credibility left (not that there is much, mind you) within the Republican party in the process. Don't believe me? Consider the following. Both have abysmal records on gun control and job creation. Both are vocal proponents of bigger government. Romney was a supporter of Obama's economic stimulus packages, and went as far as to… Read more »
Wrong,all of you. The reason we are stuck with a two party system in which a third and more reasonable candiate has no chance is that since the 1964 DNC in Chicago, we've been stuck with the "primary". Few people can afford to run two major nation-wide campaigns. The primary eliminates a lot of contenders, in particular moderate republicans adn democrats who might bring some clarity to issues and something like sanity to a nation that has become so sharply dichotomized we've forgotten how much we all need each other. This nation was built on compromise by and between our… Read more »
YOUR KIND are the reason "we" have lost. Not the "Obama"s of the world.