Sig Sauer P320 : A Closer Look At The Army’s New Gun

By Tom McHale
Tom gives us our first up-close detailed look, at the Army's new Sig Sauer P320 handgun and it's ground breaking modular design.

Sig Sauer P320 :The Army's new handgun, the Sig Sauer P320, is a polymer-framed, striker-fired design, but there's a lot more.
Sig Sauer P320 : The Army's new handgun, the Sig Sauer P320, is a polymer-framed, striker-fired design, but there's a lot more.
Tom McHale headshot low-res square
Tom McHale

USA –-(Ammoland.com)- You’ve probably heard by now that the United States Army has selected a new handgun platform.

In case you haven’t, after years of searching, testing, and generating metric tons of paperwork, the United States Department of Shooting and Spending has determined a winner: the Sig Sauer P320 . ( https://goo.gl/poKuFK )

The last time a big switch like this happened was back in 1985, the same year that Coca-Cola introduced that “New Coke” thing. Coincidence? I think not. Not only did the Army switch handgun platforms from the 1911 to the Beretta 92 / M9, they switched calibers from .45 ACP to 9mm. This time around, the caliber part is a little bit squishy as the finalist guns were all somewhat multi-caliber in nature.

So what’s the big deal about the Sig Sauer P320 handgun that enabled it to earn the prestigious $500+ million Army Modular Handgun System (MHS) contract for guns, parts, and services? Let’s take a closer look.

Sig Sauer P320 Handgun

First and foremost, the P320 does away with the double-action / single-action operation that’s been in use the past 22 years. That’s neither a benefit or a drawback, it just is. There are great reasons to choose a double-action / single-action. There are great reasons to choose a striker-fired design like the P320. They’re just different.

So, just to be clear, the P320 as a striker-fired gun has the same trigger pull sensation from first to last shot.

The one sitting on my desk as I write this has a 6.25-pound trigger weight each and every time. In theory, when your business is teaching hundred of thousands of people to shoot a handgun, that constant trigger press makes things easier. It’s heavy enough to minimize the risk of an inadvertent discharge but light enough to facilitate accurate shooting.

The other big visible difference from the Beretta M9 is that the Sig Sauer P320 is made of plastic, or at least the frame is. In fact, most of the MHS entries from Beretta, Smith & Wesson, and Glock were polymer-frame guns. Not only are they lighter, but they're also cheaper and easier to manufacture and less finicky about environmental concerns like rust. Of course, the bang-bang stuff like barrels and slides are all steel, it’s just the support infrastructure that’s made of polymer. You’ll also notice a mil-spec rail up front and ambidextrous slide release levers.

Legally, this chassis is the Sig Sauer P320 Handgun. It's the serialized component, so everything else is just... parts.
Legally, this chassis is the Sig Sauer P320 Handgun. It's the serialized component, so everything else is just… parts.

Those two things are the big visible differences, but what really drove the choice was the modular nature of the Sig Sauer P320. Unlike most pistols, the “gun” portion, at least in a legal sense, is a self-contained fire control system chassis. This central assembly contains the trigger, striker, ejector and other fire control gizmos and simply lifts out of the frame. The grip frame, barrel, recoil spring, and slide are just non-serialized parts.

Why is that a big deal? The “gun” has no caliber, length, height, or weight. All of that depends on the parts you use around the “gun.” For example, once you have the fire control chassis, you can use it to assemble a 9mm full size, .40 S&W compact, or perhaps a .357 Sig Sub Compact, or virtually any other combination of frame size, barrel length, and caliber.

With the Sig Sauer P320 design, all of these components are just parts, and can be mixed and matched to change size and caliber.
With the Sig Sauer P320 design, all of these components are just parts, and can be mixed and matched to change size and caliber.

Not having been on the Modular Handgun System selection committee, I can only guess, but I’d bet lunch that the idea of having interchangeable plastic frames had a lot of appeal for the Army folks. Some people have big hands while other Presidents, I mean people, have small hands. Sure, there are solutions on other pistol platforms that adjust grip size with insert grip panels attached by pins. But if you’re buying a billion guns that are going to get abused in the worst of conditions for a couple of decades, I would think that having whole frames with different grip sizes would be an appealing thing. No loose parts, no pins, and no grip panels to track and reconfigure. Plus, if one gets destroyed, you can just pull another whole frame out of the parts bin and swap it out.

I suspect there’s going to be a big administrative advantage to the modular idea too. When eleventy-billion HumVee loads of serialized items are purchased by a big bureaucratic behemoth like the U.S. Department of Endless Bidding Procedures, inventory management, and tracking becomes a really big deal. In theory, the modular system can make this a lot simpler as there is no “hard coded” association between a “gun” and it’s size, shape, or caliber. The serialized gun is the internal fire control chassis that works with any grip frame, barrel, and slide. It’s also not caliber specific (at least for 9mm, .40 S&W, and .357 Sig), so if the Army wants some of them to be configured in .40 S&W for a while, it’s no big deal.

All of the components required to reconfigure guns for different applications are just non-serialized parts. Armorers are going to be busy, but at least the configuring job is simple.

Presumably, one of the features the Army liked on the Sig Sauer P320 Handgun was the mil-spec rail.
Presumably, one of the features the Army liked on the Sig Sauer P320 Handgun was the mil-spec rail.

Shooting the Sig Sauer P320 Handgun

So those are the feature basics of the Sig Sauer P320 Handgun, but how does it shoot? I’ve been testing a full-size model chambered in .357 Sig for a while now, and I’ve been very pleasantly surprised by this gun. The trigger is excellent. The measured weight is 6.25 pounds, but the feel is where the P320 shines. This one has about 1/4-inch of effortless take-up, followed by 1/8-inch of constant pressure, followed by a crisp break. If you’re into riding the reset, that’s clearly audible and tactile after about 3/16-inch of forward release.

The real surprise of the P320 was its accuracy. I had three different Sig Sauer pistols, all chambered in .357 Sig, at the same time and tested them side by side using a handgun scope mounted with a UM Tactical Rail mount. I expected the venerable P226 and P229 pistols to seize the accuracy honors because they’re all metal and have storied reputations. However, just the opposite happened. Don't get me wrong, the P226 didn’t disappoint – it easily generated 25-yard, five-shot groups under three inches almost every time with a broad variety of ammo. However, the P320 beat that handily, knocking out quite a few sub-two-inch groups. For example, the first three five-shot, 25-yard groups measured just 1.56, 1.92, and 1.61 inches using Sig Sauer’s V-Crown 125-grain .357 Sig loads. Other ammo shot equally well.

You get the idea. This gun will shoot.

The Army version, now known as the XM17, sports a cool color and a manual safety lever.
The Army version, now known as the XM17, sports a cool color and a manual safety lever.

If you look at the publicity photos of the Army MHS P320, you’ll notice an extra part that’s not on the standard commercial models, a manual safety lever. The commercial P320 has lots of internal safety mechanisms including a striker block (won’t fire unless the trigger is operated), disconnect safety (won’t fire out of battery), and a takedown safety (magazine must be removed, slide locked back, and no trigger press required to disassemble the gun.) However, the Army folks wanted an external manual safety, so Sig Sauer added one to the MHS XM17model. We can safely assume that the manual safety version will be an option for the commercial market at some point too.

So there you have it. Big news from the Army, they’re getting new pistols. Given the speed at which our Armed Forces supply chain operates, I suspect it’ll take a few centuries for Sig Sauer P320 pistols to arrive on the line, but it’s in progress, starting now. If you want one, I might suggest moving quickly as lots of folks are going to want “the Army’s pistol” and it would be surprising if future production capacity wasn’t strained.

About

Tom McHale is the author of the Insanely Practical Guides book series that guides new and experienced shooters alike in a fun, approachable, and practical way. His books are available in print and eBook format on Amazon. You can also find him on Google+, Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest.

52 thoughts on “Sig Sauer P320 : A Closer Look At The Army’s New Gun

  1. I shoot a lot of different guns. Once you get accustomed to the grip angle and trigger, the 320 is a top shooter. I can’t see that great any more, and can still get hits on a 12 inch plate at 65 yards – and that is with the compact slide. I like big calibers too, but these days I would like lots of rounds handy without the weight. I put my smith 329 44 back in the drawer and carry a 320 compact and extra mag. Other than the chubby feel, my only gripe would be higher visibility front sight. I can’t pick it up quickly. I can go buy one, but after I got the sights adjusted for me, I don’t want to mess with the OUTSTANDING accuracy. Double stack 45’s I will leave to you younger guys and let you figure it out. 10mm outshines them all you know.

  2. I agree withthe comments below. You lost me at the small hands crack. I don’t care how many books you’ve written, you’re a sore loser and a political idiot, Real people aren’t interested in watching you throw your rattle.

  3. Ok article until you made the small hands comment so now I m thinking the article is fake news in respect on how good the gun is . Give me a 45 anytime especially in a double stack .

  4. Well written…. up until your small handed president comment…. that alone made this article suspect and removes credibility from your opinion. Its amazing to me that libturds just cant stick to a topic without adding political bullsh_t to it… well done. And im sure my comment wont be posted because it goes to “moderation” prior to posting, and liberal are all about censorship…

  5. I was a young soldier in 1985 when it was announced the M1911 would be replaced by the M9. I had my grandfather’s Colt Government model he bought in 1930 from the PX in China where he was based at that time. Like my granddad, I thought it would be fashionable to own a civilian version of the issue pistol. The gun rags didn’t even talk about “wonder nine’s” at that point. I was stationed in Germany at the time; as soon as I had saved up the cash, I purchased a Beretta 92 FS-B at the PX just like my old Granddad did for his Colt fifty something years earlier. It was a good pistol for it’s day, polymer pistols just weren’t refined yet, Glocks weren’t quite trusted and tested yet either. Army personnel long lamented the SIG 226 did not get the contract, but were pretty happy with the M9. After all, the pistol is not really an Infantry weapon, but sort of a specialty item in a way. I sold my Beretta long ago for a SIG 228, as I had become impressed with CIDs M11. It is my favorite pistol, maybe of all time (in 9mm). So, I was excited to see that the Army ignored that yes man (Milley) the last president installed as Army Chief of Staff (give me 15 million on a credit card and I’ll go buy G19s from Cabela’s for the Army was his approach) and continued on with the trials and selected the 320. I didn’t like it at first, but just last week went to the local PX and purchased one (a compact model, 9mm to stay true to the DoD). I have a G19, G23, G36 and G43. I carried a G19 in Iraq some years ago, and became very fond of it. But I tell you, this 320 is exactly right; I think SIG has brilliantly made a good choice. Although the G19 has some great features, the 320 in my opinion is a better choice. Armorers won’t be busier, they will love this pistol and the way the option grip frames, slide and barrel lengths and magazines can change out. I bought full size magazines (and an ex grip) and find the 17 rd mags to work seamlessly and perfectly. I compared my 320 compact with my Colt Commander, VP9 and G19 and find this 320 to be a perfect combination of those three pistols. The natural pointing of the commander and bore axis height is replicated, along with the compactness of the G19. The grip angle has always seemed odd to me for the G19/23/32 pistols, I think the 320 has a more natural hold. I am extremely happy with this 320 and can say that I wish they had issued it when I was active duty, in any cartridge/caliber. I can’t help but think they are looking towards a change in cartridge some day as the 320 can easily be retrofitted or converted. I think the .357 SIG would make an outstanding choice in caliber for the military as it has power and efficiency stamped all over it. I shoot .357 SIG out of my 229 and G23 routinely, it has great potential and would make a great carbine conversion for military use as well. We’ll see about that one. In the meantime, I think the Army (and more recently the other branches) have chosen well; extremely well, my opinion of course. As an aside, I am retired infantry enlisted and was a master gunner. I’ve carried and qualified with my fair share and then some.

  6. Thank you for the review of the Army’s new pistol, as it was very informative. I was waiting for review specs as I do like to keep up on things, even though I’ve been retired for 4 1/2 years now.

    I was first introduced to the 1911 .45 as my sidearm with the Arctic Light Infantry in 1988. I then went Aviation as a crew chief on UH 60 Black Hawks and they still had the .38 revolvers in 1990, but issued the Beretta 9mm for Desert Shield and Storm. Of course thelse pistols is what we carried on our survival vests while having the M60 Machine Gun in the windows!

    All firearms, pistolso, rifles, etc., have their purpose with their calibers and features at the time they were built. The best one just needs to be selected for the purpose intended, to include caliber.

    I personally own a Sig Sauer 1911 .45 Carry and I’m very pleased with it. I have been looking to purchasing a 9mm too, of course Sig Sauer, and leaning towards the proven 226 or other models. But now I’m very interested in considering the 320, but we’ll have to see.

    United States Army Retired, 24+ years of service with 1 + year with the Arctic Light Infantry and 23 yearswith Army Aviation.

    ~ Desert Shield, Storm and Provide Comfort
    ~ Restore and Continue Hope- Somalia
    ~ Iraqi Freedom

    Plus others situations

  7. The 320 is the only pistol that Failed the testing evaluation of the SanAntonio police dept.

    When you are shooting your 9mm 320 next, place forward pressure on the mag base pad, the pistol will malfunction every time. Bore axis is also way to high for fast shooting, you won’t see this in competition much…but then the folksvthet are going to be issued too won’t have that much training on a handgun anyway.

  8. When I came to the picture of the serialized component – the “chassis” – my first thought was: Would it be practical for someone to produce an 80% finished version of the chassis in much the same way that 80% lowers for AR-pattern rifles are being produced? It would probably have to be steel rather than aluminum which would make it a bit harder to finish with typical home workshop tools, but still . . .

  9. The military is not constrained with “just” using contact ammo, either FMJ or JHP… Special operators budgets and supply/support have access to what they need. As far as LEOs and civilians, today’s premium ammo, even for 9mm, are capable of defeating Class IIIa armor, cracking/penetrating cinder block walls, car bodies/glass, and others, i.e., are barrier blind, and far more capable than ammo originally intended for M1911A1 and M9… Modularity means easier, more rapid replacement/maintenance at field or depot levels. Duties of armorers will be greatly reduced, and troops/personnel will have more reliable, dependable weapons that will be much easier to care for in the field. Though not shown in pictures with pistols in FDE, you can be sure that threaded barrels will be available to those that need them… From what has been written so far, the reviews of the P320 in any caliber, equal or better other pistols in accuracy, right out of the box, are reliable, and shoot instinctively for many shooters. In all, there is no downside to the Sig Sauer P320 and it’s variants… If one looks at what has been released and/or deduced vis-à-vis cost per pistol, and projected life cycle, America’s warfighters will be getting a superb, affordable, reliable, and dependable weapon’s system/modular handgun… Bravo Zulu, Sig!!!

  10. He may have small hands, and some other issues, but where would we be if Clinton was in office now? Where would the gun community be? What would our future look like under her? I’d rather not even know! You can take a few slaps at him if you wish, and i certainly dont think he is perfect in any way, but look at the alternative! yeah, i’m one that voted lesser of two evils and a lot of that had to do with 2A issues.

  11. Wow! The finish on that (top pic) gun is already pretty beat up. The FDE pistol looks like that finish might hold up better…maybe.

  12. Just wonderin’ about the knock-down power of that weapon. Germans always made great quality pistols but they were garbage compared with the M1911A1. Multi calibres? Why? Ammo for that thing would cost a fortune, and with soldiers not experienced in firing a pistol, where is the first round going and how hard will it to be to bust a concrete block in one of those middle-Eastern houses, which was a complaint from the field in Iwack when the boys needed to get to a sniper, or other hidden folks…but that was the same with the M16/M2 firing the pitiful .22 calibre rifle bullet that wouldn’t do the job either. The fellas in the trenches wanted a rifle (i.e. M14) and a pistol (M1911A1 .45 cal) that would bust up a badguy hideout by tearing down his concrete block protection. You can have all your German guns, and i’m surprised our current bunch-in-charge didn’t get a Chinese version of something.

    1. Why would ammo in common calibers like 9mm Luger somehow cost a fortune for this pistol?

      Also, “knock down power” in a pistol is basically a myth – but the P320 comes in 45 ACP if that’s your preference.

  13. For any of you still not paying attention: We’re broke. Hey but at least the Army will be able to buy a fancy new pistol on credit, right?

  14. I don’t think I have read an article that mentions the plate. I don’t think it was s requirement. That being said I don’t see it being a standard feature. It is a part that can get loose and come off. Uncovered it would also leave 2 holes on the slide exposed for debris to get into the inside if the gun. But yes it is pretty glaring and should have been mentioned.

  15. If the picture is to be believed, the author fails to mention a big feature. That is, there appears to be a removable plate atop the slide which is removable to mount optical sights.

  16. I can’t wait. It can be modified to be every gun you want at less than every gun you want. This is a dream come true, a year from now, maybe. I am so glad for the single minded Glock, 1911, Baretta only people, and the I’ll never buy a plastic gun people. That will make it that much faster for me to get my XM17 Sig and accessories.

  17. No, it is not a solution looking for a problem. It was a problem that required a solution. The frame is modular as well. The M9 grip fit folks with med/large hands well, but not people with med/small hands. The grip sizes vary from large to small via their circumference. You will find the most popular size of P320 frame is small and medium. The modularity of the caliber has no bearing in this instance as the takedown lever will be locked into position and will not be user removable preventing the removal of the FCU. The P320 is lighter, and will fit more soldiers than the M9. It has less parts The SF community have different needs a soldier.

  18. The benefit of so-called modularity is a solution looking for a problem. So what you can change calibers? The US Army will issue their proven 9mm FMJ ball round to their soldiers. Not 45, not 357, not 40…standard issue 9mm rounds. Special Forces, Army Rangers, SEAL teams already use the pistol they want. Think they want to deal with a modular pistol? A new pistol? Not!!!
    So maybe the Army didn’t like the very fine Beretta M9A3, or the S&W M&P, or the Glock 17. Maybe the whole trial turned on price….

  19. I just won a new p320 in a drawing at Mega sports in Plainfield, IL about two weeks ago. It’s a compact 9mm and came with 2-15 round magazines and holster. The first 30 rounds I shot blew me away the grouping was so freaking tight. The fit feel and overall performance was second to none. I used the P320 to qualify for my ccl. The groups where so tight the instructor told me to spread um out. You couldn’t tell I fired ten shots. I like it so much I am going to buy one. I rave to everyone about it and urge them to get one. Get one and it will soon be your favorite pistol. The P320 scores a perfect 10 from me, I have been shooting for over 45 years I love it.

  20. Can I get one with a 6″ target barrel? And a vertical muzzle break? And threads for a suppressor? And chromed metal parts to contrast with the polymer? That would be sweet.

  21. Having shot, studied, and accumulated (not exactly collected) various pistols and revolvers for over 50 years, I can vouch for the quality of SIG Sauer pistols. I learned to shoot pistols in the Army, when my duty weapon was the 1911A1. I also learned the difference between its and it’s around the fourth grade. And like the author of the article, I also “revere” my pistol’s magazines — as per the paragraph under the last photo. (This kind of thing is why the liberals call us dumb rednecks. Can’t people proofread their writing?)

    1. In case you’re wondering: After my post, Ammoland corrected the author’s typo from “magazine must be revered, slide locked back” to “magazine must be removed, slide locked back” — but they still left in “…association between a ‘gun’ and it’s size, shape, or caliber,” ignoring the misuse of I-T-apostrophe-S.” Sheesh.

  22. “Some people have big hands while other Presidents, I mean people, have small hands.” Really??? Odd that a writer for a gun blog would snipe at a President who will defend the 2nd amendment while the alternative wanted an Australian style gun ban or worse. Your credibility for me – zero.

      1. @Ross, wow, lighten up a little. It was a joke and not even one that he made up, or anyone including trump himslef took seriously. Sheesh.

        @kevin, Do you seriously think that because the author rehashed a joke in his article he must have voted a certain way and expectations must have been dashed? Really? Lol

  23. Three different US calibers on the battlefield is stupid. AMMO interchangeability with NATO and other allies which used to be a good thing has gone out the window. This is the worst kind of social engineering to accommodate people with small hands and recoil aversion. No thanks. If you are going to abandon the 9 MM than give me a 1911 in 45 ACP with a large capacity magazine. A Vietnam Helicopter Pilot who “acquired” a Browning HiPower with two magazines in lieu of an S&W 38 SPC 4″ revolver with five rounds and no speed loader!

  24. The M9 was made in the USA. The P320 was designed here and will be made here. It is a stipulation of the contract that they be built here. S&W did have an entry I believe but did not make it through. The money and jobs never left.

  25. So, we went from Beretta (Italian) to Sig Sauer (German), NOBODY in THIS country makes a military grade pistol ? Colt, S&W. Ruger, etc ????
    Keeping the money and labor here would be a HUGE plus.

      1. Yes. These will be entirely NH (live free or die – just enacted Constitutional carry) USA manufactured. At least, that’s what they have said officially.

    1. My manufacturing facility is producing two pins for this pistol, here in Ct. We ship directly to New Hampshire where they are producing these pistols.
      Sole producer is NH facility in the good ole USA

  26. Used my overpaid taxes rebate on a ..45 P320. I’m pleased with it shoots, I’m looking forward to them coming out with the carry size module and slide. I’m unsure why Sig only makes 10 rd mags for the .45

  27. Man! I’ve wanted one of these for some time now before the Army contract. Unfortunately, they’re not available in California unless your exempt li!e am LEO. There’s at least a 100% markup on P320s on private party sales.

  28. I am under the impression that this is to be a double-action only (DAO) pistol. Like the SIGs issued to air marshals.

    1. It’s a SAO striker-fired pistol like a Glock, M&P or XD but with a WAY better trigger (feels like a P226 in single-action in “locked & cocked” mode but with a slightly heavier pull… at least compared to the polished SRT on my other SIG’s) and is truly modular not only in caliber but in “grip-frame” size and shape (3 sizes with 3 grip profiles each). I have one of the full-size Gen 1 P320’s in 9mm and it’s the absolute BEST striker-fired pistol I have ever owned or used (this includes highly modded Glocks, M&P & XD and a dozen others). The “medium” frame was a bit too thin but the “large” fit me like a glove and I can pull off instinct shots like a boss! In fact, the feel, function, trigger and accuracy I find it almost as good as my P226 and P229 in nearly every aspect… though I am partial to the metal double action frames. SIG has an epic winner with the P320… I can’t wait until they make a 10mm version of it… I’ll ditch my custom long-slide Glock “woods gun” in a heartbeat!

    2. It’s striker-fired, and neither double-action nor single-action in that the trigger pull is exactly the same every shot, and it does not require cocking.

  29. MY goodness you mean the government actually did something that seems RIGHT for a change. What are we going to do???????????? It’s hard to understand that the government could think that way and make it work……. Good thing it’s about time the modular weapon concept was looked at for the Military. Remember this though – it has taken this long in firearms development to be able to have this kind of system that works well enough for it to be used by the military and that is no small achievement. Sig Sauer did it and that is good.

      1. Yea, you all said that about the Kimber Solo. Shoot about 50 rounds before it name, then clear it so it will jam again.

  30. The manual safety models are already commercially available but only in compact form. Currently they are hard to find and the first few released were part of a Mass LEO contract. I have adapted my manual safety compact to a subcompact and full size frame.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *