Judicial Watch Files Second Lawsuit Against Veterans Affairs

Veterans Affairs
Veterans Affairs

Judicial WatchWashington, DC-(Ammoland.com)- Judicial Watch announced today that it has filed a second Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA) for information regarding non-veteran use of prime real estate in West Los Angeles set aside nearly 130 years ago to serve as a home for disabled veterans.

The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Veterans’ Affairs (No. 1:17-cv- 01078)).

The lawsuit was filed after the VA failed to respond to an April 14, 2017, FOIA request concerning the Veterans’ Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (VAGLAHS):

  • Any and all lease, land-sharing, enhanced-use, or other land use agreements currently in effect for the West Los Angeles/Greater Los Angeles Campus (“GLA Campus”), including but not limited to agreements with the Regents of the University of California, the Brentwood School, the Veterans Park Conservancy, and the City of Los Angeles.
  • Any and all records concerning or relating to the review of all lease, land-sharing, enhanced-use, or other land use agreements at the GLA Campus, as referenced in Appendix H of the GLA Campus Draft Master Plan, issued January 28, 2016.
  • Any and all notifications of the Secretary’s intent to enter into or renew any lease, land-sharing, enhanced-use, or other land use agreement for the GLA Campus, as required by Section 2(j)(1) of the West Los Angeles Leasing Act of 2016, 114 Pub. Law 226:

(i) The Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the U.S. Senate;
(ii) The Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the U.S. House of Representatives;
(iii) The Committee on Appropriations of the U.S. Senate;
(iv) The Committee on Appropriations of the U.S. House of Representatives;
(v) U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein;
(vi) U.S. Senator Kamala Harris; and
(vii) U.S. Representative Ted Lieu.

The property at issue was deeded to the federal government in 1888 for the specific purpose of providing a home for disabled veterans. It includes a veterans’ home, but, over time, came to include facilities for entirely unrelated uses such as a stadium for UCLA’s baseball team, an athletic complex for a nearby private prep school, a golf course, laundry facilities for a nearby Marriott hotel, storage and maintenance facilities for 20th Century Fox Television’s production sets, the Brentwood Theatre, soccer practice and match fields for a private girls’ soccer club, dog park, and a farmer’s market.

Veterans sued the VA to restore the 388-acre site to its proper use, and some of the non-veteran related uses have been terminated. In October 2015, former VA Secretary Robert A. McDonald and attorneys representing homeless veterans reached a settlement, vowing that the campus would be dedicated to serving and housing veterans in need, particularly those who were female, aging or disabled. This is Judicial Watch’s second FOIA lawsuit seeking information about use of the parcel. The first lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Veterans’ Affairs (No. 1:17-cv-0994)) was filed May 24, 2017, in federal court in the District of Columbia.

On May 29, 2017, The Los Angeles Times reported:

It’s understandable that this project will take years to complete — that’s calculated into the master plan. It is a colossal undertaking to remake a 388-acre campus. The VA did not even receive the necessary congressional authority to enter into leases with developers and service providers until September.

The problem is, there really is no new development yet. And now the VA says the first phase of 480 units will take four years to install, not 2½.

[T]he VA didn’t hire consultants to implement the master plan and conduct a lengthy environmental study until almost a year after the plan was adopted. The study is expected to take two years. Until it’s done, construction can’t begin on the 150 units planned for MacArthur Field.

“The misuse of this Los Angeles veteran’s facility is a symbol of how the VA mistreats veterans,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Our new lawsuit aims to hold the VA accountable to the rule of law and to the veterans whose interests it is supposed to serve.”

About Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law. Through its educational endeavors, Judicial Watch advocates high standards of ethics and morality in our nation’s public life and seeks to ensure that political and judicial officials do not abuse the powers entrusted to them by the American people. Judicial Watch fulfills its educational mission through litigation, investigations, and public outreach.

For more information, visit: www.JudicialWatch.org.

4
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
3 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
grappaOliver B MitchellGregory RomeuPaladin Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Oliver B Mitchell
Guest
Oliver B Mitchell

Why not sue to find out where the radioactive bodies are buried?

Gregory Romeu
Guest
Gregory Romeu

Look at all the pretty works of art adorning the hallways and offices of VA mucky-mucks and all the high-dollar printing and advertising seen throughout the VA system. I wonder where the HUNDREDS of MILLIONS or even BILLIONS of dollars came from? That’s aside from the rhetorical practice of the pharmacy being, “regulated” to send us a 12 page document to each veteran that receives the very sam ,medication every month, explaining to them what ASPRIN, VITAMIN D, VITAMIN E, SIMVASTATIN,, _ Or any statins) OMEPERZOLE and any other over the counter maintenance drugs??? The REAL question must always be,… Read more »

grappa
Guest
grappa

I mumble to myself every time I receive my meds; I ended up getting a shredder , now I mumble because these endless pages fill up my hopper with this useless paper.

Paladin
Guest
Paladin

Once again, a federal agency usurps power not given it, and ignores land use stipulations, to further line it’s own pockets. I’ll bet that the VA gets ‘rent’ or ‘lease’ payments from these endeavors, and that money is not spent on veterans. But then again, what do I know?