Washington, DC – -(AmmoLand.com)- “Judge Kavanaugh has impeccable credentials, unsurpassed qualifications, and a proven commitment to equal justice under the law. … There is no one in America more qualified for this position, and no one more deserving” ~ President Donald J. Trump.
EXCEPTIONALLY QUALIFIED: Judge Kavanaugh’s extensive experience and credentials make him one of the most exceptionally qualified Supreme Court nominees in history.
- On the night of his nomination, USA Today reported that “[o]n paper … Kavanaugh may be the most qualified Supreme Court nominee in generations.”
- The American Bar Association unanimously gave him its highest rating: well-qualified.
- He has served on the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, often called the Nation’s “second highest court,” for more than 12 years.
- He has written more than 300 opinions and heard more than 2,000 cases.
- At least 13 of his opinions have been vindicated by the Supreme Court—an unparalleled record of influence and success across the ideological spectrum.
- He is a co-author of a leading book on judicial precedent, Law of Judicial Precedent, and has published nine articles in respected academic law journals.
- He has taught for more than a decade at the Nation’s two top law schools, Yale and Harvard (where he was hired by then-Dean and now-Justice Elena Kagan).
- The New York Times noted that his teaching evaluations reflect “glowing praise … [m]ore than a few students said he was the most impressive law school professor they had ever encountered.”
- He clerked for Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, who became a mentor.
- He has argued before the Supreme Court.
- He served more than five years in the White House, including as White House Staff Secretary and as Associate White House Counsel.
- He was a partner at a respected law firm, where he wrote several Supreme Court briefs and also provided pro bono legal services to a range of clients.
- He is a graduate of Yale College and Yale Law School, where he was an editor on law review.
INDEPENDENT AND IMPARTIAL: Judge Kavanaugh has a clear record as an independent and impartial arbiter of the law.
- He bases his rulings on the law—not politics, policy, or the identities of the litigants.
- He has ruled both for and against businesses, workers, environmentalists, landowners, civil-rights plaintiffs, political parties, and criminal defendants.
- He ruled against the Republican National Committee in one campaign-finance case and in favor of Emily’s List (a liberal pro-choice group) in another campaign-finance case.
- He ruled in favor of a pro se African-American plaintiff who had been called the “n-word” at work, concluding that he had endured a hostile work environment.
- He has ruled in favor of convicted drug dealers and murderers who were denied fair trials.
- He has ruled in favor of environmentalist plaintiffs and the Environmental Protection Agency in some cases, and in favor of Western landowners and coal miners in others.
- He ruled at least 23 times against Bush Administration agencies from 2006 to 2008.
- His opinions are as likely to be joined in full by his Democrat-appointed colleagues (88.67 percent) as by his Republican-appointed colleagues (88.94 percent).
- On at least 10 occasions, he has sided with a Democrat-appointed colleague over the dissent of a Republican-appointed colleague.
- Chief United States Circuit Judge Garland (appointed by President Clinton and nominated for the Supreme Court by President Obama) has joined Judge Kavanaugh’s majority opinions 96.43 percent of the time.
DEVOTED TO PRECEDENT: Judge Kavanaugh’s work demonstrates a strong devotion to precedent and stability in the law.
- He co-wrote a leading book on judicial precedent with 10 other judges.
- The book explains that precedent is critical to stability in the law and “allows individuals to plan their affairs and to safely judge their legal rights.”
- He has written that it is “essential for courts to be as consistent as we possibly can.”
- His decisions have invoked stare decisis (the need to follow precedent).
- In one opinion, he described an earlier decision as “wrongly decided,” but said it was “water over the dam” because he was “bound to apply that precedent.”
MODEL OF CHARACTER: Throughout his career, Judge Kavanaugh has proven to be a model of character, integrity, and public service.
- His mother, a trailblazing prosecutor and trial judge in Maryland, inspired him to pursue a career in law.
- He has spent 25 of the 28 years of his career in public service.
- He tutors low-income students, serves meals to the homeless, and is a lector at church.
- He coaches his daughters’ basketball teams and serves as a mentor to his players.
- The mother of one player described how Judge Kavanaugh has taken her daughter to the school’s father-daughter dance every year since her husband passed away.
- He is a leader for gender equality and for supporting women in the workplace.
- More than half of the law clerks he has hired (25 of 48) are women.
- He was the first D.C. Circuit Judge ever to hire an all-female class of law clerks.
- Eighty-four percent of his female law clerks have gone on to clerk at the Supreme Court.
- In a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee, his female law clerks called him “one of the strongest advocates in the federal judiciary for women lawyers” and said the legal profession is “fairer and more equal” because of him.
- He is a leader in promoting racial equality and advancing minorities in the workplace.
- He wrote a law review article about ending racial discrimination in jury selection.
- He regularly visits the Yale and Harvard Black Law Students Association and has taken an active role in helping minority students obtain judicial clerkships.
- Twenty-seven percent of the law clerks he has hired (13 of 48) are racial/ethnic minorities.
- More than 10 percent of the law clerks he has hired (5 of 48) are African American—much greater than the percentage of African Americans at top law schools.
I believe this web site holds some real wonderful information for everyone : D.
Good on the 2nd Amendment.
His opinions on the 4th Amendment suck.
I’d like to see more rulings based on principle than precedent.
Republicans better get there heads out of there ass bring to a vote wtf are they waiting on !! Harry the ahole Reed would have had there idiot voted in the day hearings ended!!
He is a judge that follows the law not the normal left wing idiot that smoked too much dope in law school.
He wouldn’t have been my first choice but then I didn’t get to choose,my only hope is he is a bit better than that of who he is replacing on the court.
“He bases his rulings on the law—not politics, policy, or the identities of the litigants.”
False. Go find a video titled “Jeff Flake Questions Brett Kavanaugh At Confirmation hearing 9/5/18” and skip to 28:20. There Flake asks him when a Supreme Court Justice should overturn precedent. Kavanaugh responds by saying the effect precedent has had on the world should be considered, and only “grievously” wrong precedent should be overturned. It’s clear Kavanaugh does not care about the supreme law of the US, only precedent.
So who would YOU nominate to the SCOTUS? Obozo?
You are basing your opinion on Flakey Jeff ? By the way, Prohibition was repealed after it was enacted .
I’m basing my opinion on Kavanaugh’s response. Who asked the question is, at worst, irrelevant and would, if anything, make it worse: A straightfoward question by Jeff Flake is all it took to make him stumble? The question he was asked was straightforward, perfectly reasonable to ask and should have been expected.
Prohibition was repealed by an amendment, not by judicial action. It is 100% irrelevant to the Supreme Court.
I’ll just bet your a Democrat, why? Didn’t read any of the article with comprehension, actually believed the circus surrounding the confirmation hearing,need I go on?
Nope. I want Kavanaugh to fail so Trump can nominate someone like Gorsuch instead of someone like Kennedy (though I recall Kennedy had more respect for the 4th amendment than Kavanaugh has displayed). I based my opinion about Kavanaugh on his testimony and his prior rulings (that time he went out of his way to assert machine guns weren’t protected by the second amendment)
Sadly, I can not support Kavanaugh either. Kavanaugh’s minority dissent (when the D.C. Circuit panel’s majority upheld the District of Columbia’s ban on possession of most semi-automatic rifles and its registration requirement for all guns in D.C): “In Heller, the Supreme Court held that handguns – the vast majority of which today are semi-automatic – are constitutionally protected because they have not traditionally been banned and are in common use by law-abiding citizens. There is no meaningful or persuasive constitutional distinction between semi-automatic handguns and semiautomatic rifles. Semi-automatic rifles, like semi-automatic handguns, have not traditionally been banned and are in… Read more »