Woman Removed from Gun Control Bill Hearing for Threatening to Shoot NRA Members

Woman Removed from Gun Control Bill Hearing for Threatening to Shoot NRA Members
Woman Removed from Gun Control Bill Hearing for Threatening to Shoot NRA Members

Connecticut – -(AmmoLand.com)- It is being reported that an as yet to be identified woman gun-control activist was removed from a Connecticut gun control hearing Monday after she was spotted sending a text threatening to shoot a Republican lawmaker and NRA members.

“If I had a gun, I’d blow away Sampson, and a large group of NRA,” a photo of the text message-in-progress reads, according to a tweet.

From the photo, the woman appeared to be directing her threats at Republican Connecticut state Sen. Rob Sampson, who is one of the few Constitutional conservatives in the state legislature and is a past NRA “Defender of Freedom Award” recipient.

Several gun control measures were set to be discussed in Hartford on Monday before the Judiciary Committee, including:

  • Mandatory Gun Storage Laws
  • A measure requiring anyone open-carrying a firearm to produce a permit if asked by police
  • A move to regulate “ghost guns” or 3-D printed firearms and components
  • A bill prohibiting cities and towns from enacting their own firearms laws

Why are the ones who are always calling for more gun control the same ones who seem to have the least personal self-control?

Subscribe
Notify of
40 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Get Out
Get Out
1 year ago

Hmm, I see a double standard here, she should have been arrested and charged for making a terroristic threats. She’s in need of a vacation at the nearest federal prison and placed on the watch list for the rest of her life..

Charles Moore
Charles Moore
1 year ago

Ahh, there’s that “tolerant left” again . . . .

Charles Moore
Charles Moore
1 year ago

Perhaps a better question to close with would be, “why are the ones always calling for more gun control the same ones who seem to be constantly foaming at the mouth wanting a gun for the wrong reasons?”

tomcat
tomcat
1 year ago

If the democrats get full control in the swamp your life or property won’t be worth a plug nickel. They will come for what you have, if they can use it and they will torture you for being conservative. Even having the house makes them come after our guns and our taxes so they can spend more on the illegals they need to defeat us. They aren’t Americans, they are borderless idiots that have been spoon fed the liberal, socialist bunk all their lives. When you listen to what AOC has to say, which is usually stupid, you can hear… Read more »

Wild Bill
Wild Bill
1 year ago
Reply to  tomcat

@Tcat, Next time a democrat national socialist gets elected POTUS, I am going to draw my money out of the banks a couple grand at a time, and keep it here in cash so that a libtard administration can not “nationalize” it.

John T
John T
1 year ago
Reply to  tomcat

I know this much, when the s*it hits the fan, I WILL not help or defend ANY anti-gun zealot, they can go eat s*it and die.

Jack
Jack
1 year ago

I thought threatening someone was illegal in this country

John T
John T
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack

It is but only if your a conservative

Scott in Atlanta
Scott in Atlanta
1 year ago

Democrats: Give us your guns so only WE can shoot YOU.

JPM
JPM
1 year ago

So, typical of Democrats and liberals, she wants to have a gun, but not have anyone else to have one, and she wants to commit murder with the gun. I bet she doesn’t want to be arrested after shooting people either. A perfect example of why it isn’t the guns that are the problem, but the deranged individuals using them. Note that Democrats are the ones responsible for all the school and church shootings and the vast majority of other mass shootings. The press and Congress conveniently has overlooked that fact.

Gdubb
Gdubb
1 year ago

What would happen if the tables were turned, and a pro2a supporter was caught sending similar messages during a hearing, describing a proposed lethal gun attack upon a liberal politician and group of brain-dead snowflakes? THEY WOULD BE BROUGHT UP ON CHARGES! How is it acceptable for one side to openly threaten lives using violence, while the other side is persecuted to the fullest extent of the law?

Jim Macklin
Jim Macklin
1 year ago

It is a crime under the laws to threaten anyone. Removed from a hearing to a squad room?

Dissapointed Gun Owner
Dissapointed Gun Owner
1 year ago

Does this mean I need to take the NRA sticker off my truck before an anti gunner shoots me? Imagine if an NRA member threatened to do the same to an anti gun politician. Imagine the outrage on the media if that happened. Notice this has become a one way media circus against responsible gun owners. Guess I will case my guns, separate my ammo, and lock eberything up until I am on the firing line at my gun club due to our vigorous safety rules here in Newsome’s California. Hope an anti gunner doesn’t shoot at me since I… Read more »

Zee
Zee
1 year ago

She reminds me of college students that see a group of protestors marching by, then joins them just to be protesting against an issue they no nothing about. They suffer from “Contempt Prior To Investigation”.

BILL PHILLIPS
BILL PHILLIPS
1 year ago

THERE IS ALLWAYS A NUT BEHIND EVERY BUSH, SHE SHOULD BE CHARGED, MAKE AN EXAMPOL OF HER.

Hoplite
Hoplite
1 year ago
Reply to  BILL PHILLIPS

Bill, scream at the Connecticut AG. Not us. Thanks.

Laddyboy
Laddyboy
1 year ago

Time to hold all of these Anti-Second Amendment individuals accountable by suit cases for their SMEARING of LEGAL LAW ABIDING American CITIZENS.
Those Anti-Second Amendment “representatives”, “speakers’ and “actors” MUST – – FIRST – – REFUSE all of the GUN TOTING SECURITY GUARDS they have around them for most of the day.
Since these Second Amendment DENIERS must DISMISS all Police and ARMED Security guards at all LOANED GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS WHERE EVER THEY ARE.
All weapons must be banned for 500 yards anywhere these ANTI-2nd Amendment people happen to be.

Jack
Jack
1 year ago
Reply to  Laddyboy

Very. Well put I agree 100 percent

joefoam
joefoam
1 year ago

If it were Twitter or YouTube or Facebook the post would have been censored. If were an anti gun tirade she would have been celebrated, but since she was anti NRA she just gets walked out.

Rock
Rock
1 year ago

Post her name, let those threatened (ALL NRA members) by her KNOW who she is…. They have a right to know.

Jack Mac
Jack Mac
1 year ago
Reply to  Rock

Red Flagger!

AggregatVier
AggregatVier
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack Mac

Flagger? I don’t even know her.

Jason Wells
Jason Wells
1 year ago

ANY LAWS MADE ARE ANDCWILL VIOLATE OUR 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS. YOU GIVE THEM A INCH AND THEY ARE GONNA RUN WITH IT. RUSSIA & CHINA ARE SPEAKING ON ATTACKING AMERICA ON OUR SOIL AND THEY ARE GOING AFTER OUR GUNS AT THE SAME TIME!!! DOES ANYONE SER A PROBLEM HERE? ITS COMMON SENSE FOLKS WITHOUT AR’S & AK’S TO DEFEND OURSELVES WE ARE SITYING DUCKS! And They (Liberal Communist) know it!

Hoplite
Hoplite
1 year ago
Reply to  Jason Wells

Jason, what is with the screaming? You are shouting at the choir. We agree. Shouting does not help the message. Thanks,

Lord-Pi-314
Lord-Pi-314
1 year ago
Reply to  Hoplite

@HOPLITE….WHO CARES WHAT SIZE FONT HE USES ? It’s easier to see for some people. Who says it is SHOUTING ? That is just an extension of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS !

tom
tom
1 year ago
Reply to  Lord-Pi-314

THANK YOU!

TheHolyCrow
TheHolyCrow
1 year ago
Reply to  Jason Wells

@Jason….And look at the army of fighting aged men all bunched up at the border, waiting to invade OUR country. All along the way of their trek here, supplies of food, water, medical supplies, busses etc. all magically appeared in a very coordinated military type manner. What if the plan is that when they get in here, supplies of fully automatic machine guns,with copious ammo, magically appear for them to use against the US Citizen ? We citizens would be in a bit of trouble, what with most of our troops spread out overseas. Seems a bit too coincidental, don’t… Read more »

n.r. ringlee
n.r. ringlee
1 year ago

Simply inflict all of the proposed control measures on her and her social media accounts. Make her undergo a background check and 10 day waiting period before she can get a phone or computer. And create a very narrow, arbitrary list of authorized phones and computers from which she may choose. Then force her to keep it locked up unless it is during her authorized social media time and at a specified place. Have her give her user names and passwords on all accounts to the CT State Police so they can monitor her activities. Put a word blocker on… Read more »

RotaryConnected
RotaryConnected
1 year ago
Reply to  n.r. ringlee

Have the cops go to her house at 4am to confiscate any guns she may have hidden in her closet, or her attic, or cellar, or breadbox. Tear everything apart looking for them, and see how she likes it. After all, she did make a threat. Knowing how those creeps think, she is probably armed to the teeth.

Jack
Jack
1 year ago
Reply to  n.r. ringlee

Put her on a terrorist watch list

Witold Pilecki
Witold Pilecki
1 year ago

It’s called projection. These anti-gun supporters harbor violent, murderous tendencies of their own, and would carry them out if they had the means (weapons), so they believe everyone else must as well. On the other hand, 99.9% of legit gun owners are non-violent, and mostly quite polite
The anti’s are actually quite mentally ill.

The Green Watch Dog
The Green Watch Dog
1 year ago

She needs to be lectured with more than just a walk out of the building! I suggest an open investigation from A-Z on her past by law enforcement. Find those skeletons. A respectful sit down visit from three suited men and 2 suited women all in Ray Bans.

Ron
Ron
1 year ago

I agree, It does seem that ‘certain’ people are exempt or excused from such things.
Depending upon who is responsible for the post,,tweet etc. A lot of people
would be given the riot act..at least.

Jack Mac
Jack Mac
1 year ago

Call a Red Flag on her, you support ERPO, use it.

The Green Watch Dog
The Green Watch Dog
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack Mac

Yes, I would have called 911 if I was present at the meeting. Hopefully that was done and not reported to the media. The state of Connecticut was the 1st state to enact red flag laws. I would get all the facts and if her actions did indeed meet the requirements for an ERPO then expect charges to be filed.

Green Mtn. Boy
Green Mtn. Boy
1 year ago

Very simple,Anti 2 nd. amendment/Anti Constitution/Un American types are emotional basket cases . They are ruled by feelings rather than thought and reason and assume that all Americans are the emotional basket cases they are,thus the irrational fear of arms in a free society of America.

Ton E
Ton E
1 year ago

“If I had a gun, I’d blow away Sampson, and a large group of NRA”

Soooo you don’t have a gun and you would use one to shoot people just because you disagree with them. But somehow we’re the problem…..gotcha!

Wild Bill
Wild Bill
1 year ago
Reply to  Ton E

@Ton E and m, She is just another proof why our Right to keep and carry arms exists.

TheHolyCrow
TheHolyCrow
1 year ago
Reply to  Ton E

I am willing to wager that just like Bloomberg, and Feinstein, and all the other Bolshevik gun grabbers, she does have a gun and/or armed security. I am willing to wager that her agenda has nothing to do with “the safety of the children” but more for waging war against the Constitution and specifically the 2A, in furtherance of the Commie Bolshevik NWO agenda of conquering America. If you ask me, if she is a citizen, she is a TRAITOR, and I’ll bet she is also in favor of “hate crime ” laws. You people should investigate what the hate… Read more »

m.
m.
1 year ago

another peaceful, non-violent member from the political party of peace