Opinion by Jay Chambers

USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- There was a time in the United States when owning a gun wasn’t considered an indicator of what sort of person you were. Owning a gun didn’t mean anything more than owning a wrench did. They’re both tools. And they were regarded as such.
Unfortunately, legal gun ownership and use carries much more social and political baggage than it used to. People have formed prejudices against legal gun use that can make guns an uncomfortable topic for gun owners.
Some of these prejudices are manufactured to push a political agenda. Some have occurred more organically. However, they’re all problematic for the same reason: they’re wrong.
And, these prejudices are especially damaging because they not only stigmatize legal gun owners, they scare new gun owners away from purchasing firearms—even when they may have a completely legitimate reason for getting a gun, like personal defense.
Unfortunately, the most common prejudices are repeated often on social media, and are even “verified” by certain news outlets.
These are the common prejudices that get favorable treatment in a lot of circles.
All Gun Owners are Extreme Conservatives
First, yes, it’s true that there are conservatives who own guns. But there are also liberals who own guns. There’s even an organization for liberal gun owners.
Unfortunately, the politics of the gun rights and the Second Amendment have been painted as a partisan issue. Maybe it’s a strategic move to fracture support for the Second Amendment and reduce coordinated resistance to gun control regulation.
Either way, the fact remains that nobody can discern who you voted for, or even which party you might affiliate with, just based on whether or not you own a gun.
Additionally, owning a gun doesn’t indicate any malice or hatred for the government. Opposing regulation that you don’t agree with isn’t resistance or belligerance. People should have input in the formation of new laws and regulations. Whether or not you support new regulations isn’t an indicator of some desire to start a rebellion or insurgency.
Possessing a Gun Indicates Violent Behavior
This opinion gets touted a lot by bias news media. People claim that the only reason to carry a gun is if you’re looking for a fight. Or, maybe you’ve had someone ask you why you have a gun ready for home defense as if you’d be crazy to have a gun in your house.
The idea that the only reason you’d have a gun is because you’re actively looking to engage in violence is a fallacy. The mere possession of a tool does is not an adequate indicator of intent.
Guns are tools. And, just like other tools, there are multiple uses, and even various needs, for a gun. Simply having a gun does not indicate which of those uses you intend to use the gun for.
Furthermore, the total number of firearm homicides in the U.S. each year is far less than one tenth of one percent of the total population. Even the total number of violent crimes reported in 2017 was only 5.3 million, which would be just under two percent of the population. So, the actual data reveals that owning a gun is not a good predictor of violent behavior.
Anyone who believes that mere possession of a gun proves a certain intent has made a predetermined decision, without enough information to accurately reach that conclusion. It’s textbook prejudice.
Gun Owners Are More Likely to Be Racist Than Those Who Do Not Own Guns
This one comes and goes in terms of popularity. In 2013, the Huffington Post published an article which cited a study that “showed” this. However, the study used something called “symbolic racism” to evaluate people’s biases, and more recent articles mostly cite anecdotal evidence. Mostly
So, again, this seems like another predetermined judgement based on inadequate information.
Is it true that racists own guns? Yes. But, people who aren’t racists also own guns. Even though the numbers are tough to work out on this one, the most likely scenario is that the number of upstanding gun owners far outnumbers the racist gun owners.
On the other hand, less than half of households in the United States own guns. Which means that there’s a very good chance that there are more racists who don’t own guns than racists who do.
Just addressing this issue requires a lot of assumption and inference, because it’s so hard to get any good information. That means there’s not enough information to make a dependable judgement. So, this assumption about gun owners is certainly painting with a very broad brush, that almost certainly can’t be accurate.
Let the Prejudices Lie
Although these prejudices can make things uncomfortable, especially in conversations about guns rights and gun ownership, they’re most deeply held by people who occupy the extremes of the political spectrum (or the political grid).
So, chances are that most people don’t buy these ideas wholesale, and gun owners from any walk of life can work against these prejudices by clearly articulating why we own guns and how to make gun ownership safer for everyone.
Jay Chambers is a pro free speech business owner based in Austin, Texas. Having lived through several natural disasters and more than a few man-made ones (hello 2008), he believes that resilience and self-sufficiency are essential in this increasingly unpredictable world. That’s why he started a business! Jay writes over at Minute Man Review.

Jay,
kudos for writing an article that doesn’t resort to labeling — the very thing we gun owners want to avoid. It’s written with a cool hat and facts at hand, as they all should be, so it can be easily shared with folks who are otherwise a bit single-minded.
Those who have embraced the liberal agenda find it convenient to label all who might oppose their plans to be ‘RACIST”. This has been the pattern for more than half a century. They now include “homophobia” “islamophobia” and “misogynist” almost as a litany when they make their verbal assaults, with no evidence to the truth of those charges necessary. In point of fact, the very attempt to refute those charges is simply evidence (according to the “liberal” screaming monkey crowd) that the accusations are true.
Red flag laws are the reason why you need to know who your audience is. Anyone can falsely make a claim without proof, but you the gun owner must provide every shred of evidence to prove you are not who they say you are. AND they must believe you.
As a kid I used to go to a quiet secluded beach on the east coast of Florida late late at night. It was a peaceful place to walk with a friend and chat with nobody else around. I moved away to an anti-gun country, and just recently returned to FL with my wife, and wanted to share with her this beautiful experience of enjoying a quiet beach in the moonlight and walking to the end of a long pier to spot Dolphins and otters. Then one night, the second time I took her out there, we weren’t alone, and… Read more »
Good article. In my own experience, most people who are not in the “pro-gun camp,” or who don’t own guns, are not actually antigun, but rather ambivalent about gun ownership. They haven’t grown up around guns, don’t generally have one handy at home (although there may be one buried in a closet somewhere), don’t think they have a dog in this fight, and just don’t think about guns much. They DO however, watch and listen when arguments arise or discussions occur at the local coffee house or wherever. What they remember afterwards is not so much the statistics often used,… Read more »
The natural law right to self-defense and those and that which we love and cherish comes from the Right Hand of God. The Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect it from government infringement. Without that unbridgeable right to keep and bear arms we are not free.
“Hello, my name is Roy D., I am an extreme conservative. I am also a gun owner.”