Testing 9mm Ammunition for Serious Purposes

Opinion

Testing 9mm Ammunition for Serious Purposes
Testing 9mm Ammunition for Serious Purposes

Ft Collins, CO –-(Ammoland.com)- Ammunition performance:

In Pensylvania last weekend, during a DTI Urban Rifle Course, we had the opportunity to test the terminal performance of high-performance pistol ammunition on blocks of ten-percent gelatin.

My long-time friend, Mike Shovel, currently the sales manager for Cor-Bon, made all this possible.

Mike has been in the serious ammunition business longer than nearly any of my other friends and has forgotten more about the subject than I’ll ever likely know.

When Mike talks, I listen.

Gelatin, as a ballistic test-medium, or “human tissue ‘simulant’” is undoubtedly not without critics.

Homogeneous (and mostly transparent), “ballistic” gelatin may be useful for comparing various brands of serious ammunition, and it is probably as close to “reality” as we’re likely to get, but its “predictive ability” is far from universally acknowledged.

Thus, we need to be cautious about making sweeping conclusions, derived solely from gelatin data.

Still, I test ammunition in gelatin every chance I get.

I test ammunition in gelatin every chance I get. File Photo
Lehigh Defense 300 Blackout Whisper Bullet 10% Ordnance Gelatin Shot

FBI testing protocol correctly requires that bullets first penetrate “normal” clothing before entering the gelatin block itself. “Normal clothing” is usually defined as four layers of substantial denim, as one would typically find in denim work pants.

That fabric “barrier” is significant! I’ve witnessed more than one high-performance hollow-point bullet monotonously expand “by-the-book” when penetrating bare gelatin, but perform significantly less well, and with far less consistency, when penetrating fabric barriers first.

Under these conditions, I like bullets that reproducibly penetrate twelve to eighteen inches of gelatin (FBI Standard), but many of my colleagues believe nine to fifteen inches of penetration represents a more delineative standard, particularly for personal defense.

A persuasive argument can be made either way.

Out of my SIG 320 (9mm), with its 3 and 5/8 inch barrel, we tested:

These four turned-in superior performance, expanding consistently/symmetrically (with the exception of Lehigh’s FTM bullet) and penetrating to a uniform fifteen inches. Cavitation in the gelatin between the four was essentially identical.

Tissue destruction is accomplished via bullet expansion and jagged frontal area (after expansion) with conventional hollow-point bullets. Something similar is accomplished via plasma jets created by Lehigh’s FTM bullet (which does not change shape) as it passes through tissue.

In any event, between the four, I was able to see no difference in shape, nor appearance, of wound channels. Velocity variation between rounds, with all four, was small, less than 30f/s, indicating excellent quality control during manufacture. Super Vel’s velocity was the most consistent, but all were very acceptable.

My conclusion is that any of the above four represents as good a performance as we are ever likely to see from serious pistol ammunition, from serious carry-pistols.

  • Poor performance was turned-in by Federal Hydra-Shok, 124gr. Expansion was generally incomplete and consistently inconsistent.
  • Federal is a fine company, and their quality control is probably the best in the business, but the Hydra-Shok round, while still in production, represents a dated technology and is mostly obsolete, in my opinion.
  • Federal’s 124gr HST represents a much better choice!
  • Hornady’s 124gr Critical Duty also represents a good choice

The preceding is, of course, my observation and my opinion. When you carry a 9mm pistol, I can comfortably recommend any of the rounds I mentioned favorably.

I should add that ammunition from companies I did not mention, like Underwood, Gorilla, and Black Hills also enjoy good reputations.

Eventually, I’ll test them all!

/John


Defense Training International, Inc

About John Farnam & Defense Training International, Inc
As a defensive weapons and tactics instructor John Farnam will urge you, based on your own beliefs, to make up your mind in advance as to what you would do when faced with an imminent lethal threat. You should, of course, also decide what preparations you should make in advance if any. Defense Training International wants to make sure that their students fully understand the physical, legal, psychological, and societal consequences of their actions or in-actions.

It is our duty to make you aware of certain unpleasant physical realities intrinsic to the Planet Earth. Mr. Farnam is happy to be your counselor and advisor. Visit: www.defense-training.com

30 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ernesto

Sounds like a sales pitch.

Deplorable Bill

Go to the market and spend $25.00. Buy a pack of pork ribs and a pork roast. If you want to get real, get a pig torso complete w/ skin, ribs and internals. This is the most realistic test medium I have found. It’s summer now so put a tee shirt around it and start testing. Pig skin, ribs, internals VERY closely duplicates a human body. You might even have enough left for the BBQ. Ballistic gel is expensive, pork isn’t. Ballistic gel IS TEMPERTURE SENSITIVE, pork isn’t. Back in the day, the military did tests of every major type… Read more »

Jack A Furbush

The thing that really sucks is that a lot of SCUMBAGS didn’t read the ballistic reports and don’t know the have been hit with the best bullet technologist can build. What ever you choose to load your favorite blaster with it’s hard to go wrong. TRAIN/ PRACTICE that’s what really counts

Jack A Furbush

There is all kinds of research data available on ammunition of all types of ammunition available. 90 % of it is very good. Shooting into living flesh is pretty much a thing of the past in America. The only real way that ammunition can really be accurately tested is shoot something that is alive when you shoot it, plain and simple. Unlike the NAZI & Japanese research collected during WW2 we can’t actually shoot living people to see what happens. The down side is ballistic gel has never been alive. The performance is very different. Wet news paper being paper… Read more »

JPR

Lucky Gunner has done a plethora of testing lots of self-defense type ammunition in most major calibers (380 ACP, 9mm, 40S&W, 45 ACP, 38 SPL, 357 MAG, 357 SIG, and 10mm) from short barrel handguns. Their findings also repeat the same findings you have above as far as the 9mm goes. They don’t really give any opinions on the rounds, they let the tests speak for themselves.

https://www.luckygunner.com/labs/self-defense-ammo-ballistic-tests/

JoeSmarterThanYou

The LeHigh extreme defense screwdrivers is a joke, it only makes cool patterns in gel (not tissue) due the low elastic limit of ballistics gelatin, for the same temporary stretch cavitirs do the same in gel and not tissue. If it actually was doing the same amount of damage/work as a hollow point it would slow down just as much (or accelerates negatively that is. Force = mass * acceleration, for terminal ballistics and car crashes that force is calculated the rate at which an ok biect decelerates) just as much. As it would expending energy to do so, and… Read more »

1 2 3