NRA-Supported Case Heard by Supreme Court

Opinion

U.S. Supreme Court Image NRA-ILA
NRA-Supported Case Heard by Supreme Court

Fairfax, VA – -(Ammoland.com)- The National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) says this week’s Supreme Court hearing on a New York City gun control law could ultimately strengthen the ability of law-abiding citizens to exercise their Second Amendment rights by making it harder for governments to impose gun control schemes.

The NRA-supported case, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association (NYSRPA) v. the City of New York, centers on New York City’s handgun “premises” license that restricts gun owners from transporting a handgun to a range or other residence outside city limits. After the NRA’s New York affiliate, the NYSRPA, challenged that law, and the Supreme Court took up the case, the City amended its regulation in an attempt to moot the case and prevent the high court from hearing it.

“It’s rare that SCOTUS takes on a Second Amendment case. It is perhaps unprecedented when a defendant, in this case New York City, tries to win by admitting they passed an unconstitutional law and revoking it in a last-ditch effort to stop the Court from hearing the case,” said Jason Ouimet, executive director, NRA-ILA.

“Will other states facing similar NRA-supported challenges “throw in the towel” at the 11th hour as Justice Sotomayor says New York did in this case?

“This case is just one more example of how the NRA fights every day, as it always has, to protect the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans.”

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on this case before the end of June 2020.


National Rifle Association Institute For Legislative Action (NRA-ILA)

About:

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit: www.nra.org

80 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tetejaun

Has ANYONE noticed that Will Flatt, Charlie Foxtrot, hounddogdave and a few others attack the NRA, yet they can NEVER post any NRA writings that support their lies? Only the WAPO, New York Times and Bloomberg state what Flatt and CF regurgitate here with all their hatred along with it. Charlie Foxtrot is definitely a democrat spewing dissension among the ranks. He ever uses their language. DEMOCRATS cause dissension among gun owners by pretending to be pro-gun yet attacking the Second Amendment and its supporters. They spread lies and accuse those who counter them as being the enemy. It is… Read more »

HoundDogDave

Grrr….NRA weasels. The only thing that annoys me more than someone not taking responsibility for their actions/failures, is them taking credit for someone else’s effort/success. The AG’s of NY and DC need to finish up and clear the scoundrels out or shut it down.

Relic

Trump the commie plinko made it to where any future democrat can ban whatever he wants through presidential fiat aka decree aka executive order. Trump single-handedly served the 2nd amendment on a platter to Bloomberg & his belderberg cronies because by overturning centuries of precedent when he banned slide fire bumpstocks & when he also rendered them crimes to not have it confiscated. But according to dumb trumptards he loves the 2nd amendment which must be why he has repeatedly said hes receptive to a new AWB

Deplorable Bill

OK, it has already been proven that the citizen has the right to be armed at home. This one is about the transportation of the firearm from home to… wherever. It’s a good thing this is going to court but it should not be needed at all. The 2A answers all the questions. The right to carry, the right to keep firearms was decided by the 2A. ANY law that says otherwise is criminal and treasonous. My understanding is that ALL the states are supposed to follow the constitution. So the actual issue is; does state, county or city government… Read more »

Baldwin

“This case is just one more example of how the NRA fights every day, as it always has, to protect the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans.”

Except in Virginia…

Autsin Miller III

Who brought this case? Was it the NRA?